Nah they'd just be T3.Hobo Joe wrote:bladwings would cost twice as much and move half as fast and build twice as slow and be half as effective.
BA II Goals + Nominations
Moderator: Content Developer
Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: 13 Jan 2009, 11:20
Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations
give bladewings a limited supply of shots (like 20 or 30) and then a minute cooldown period, so a stumpy army can't be permastunned anymore.
that way they remain the same when used for preparing attacks or stopping pushes on the defenses, but give raids a chance to escape if they dont get taken out fast after being stunned.
i am thinking of a similar system for the vulcan btw.
that way they remain the same when used for preparing attacks or stopping pushes on the defenses, but give raids a chance to escape if they dont get taken out fast after being stunned.
i am thinking of a similar system for the vulcan btw.
Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations
Units take 25% less EMP damage while moving.Jazcash wrote:albator wrote:For balance, I am up too. Someone need to counter balance jaz for his will to make anygame ba game an only-stump-game anyway... :p![]()
I'm actually quite fair and discrete about balance changes tbh, I wouldn't be some kind of mass modifying pirate.
- Core Bladewing reload time increased (1.2->1.5) (25%)
-> virtual cost (for same efficiency) increased by 50% !!!!!
highest bluff of all the EA change...
still :
Jazcash wrote:There's so many *A's, I don't even know which way to look.
I appreciate most of these balance changes though. Although, Bladewings could use a bit more of a nerf than that![]()
Also:I lol'd- Arm Maverick reload time reduced (0.945->0.9)
Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations
i'm against nerfing bladewings; i think ARM could have an equivalent unit, maybe a hovercraft EMP flying bomb
blades are more effective in teamgames, but i think i've seen banshees win enough smaller games via surprise attack that it balances out in my mind
if blades could actually kill, that would be different
blades are more effective in teamgames, but i think i've seen banshees win enough smaller games via surprise attack that it balances out in my mind
if blades could actually kill, that would be different
Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations
I couldnot agree more. Global core EMP ability is acutally far lower than arm that have t2 trans that stun realy easily unit like goliat, or t2 EMP bomber that is the best unit to counter T3 spam... Ofc Jazz "forgot" to mention that since he likes to play core so much...KaiserJ wrote:i'm against nerfing bladewings; i think ARM could have an equivalent unit, maybe a hovercraft EMP flying bomb
blades are more effective in teamgames, but i think i've seen banshees win enough smaller games via surprise attack that it balances out in my mind
if blades could actually kill, that would be different
If there was a nerf that had to be done on any EMP unit, it would be ARM t2 trans, not blades.
I am actually for an arm t1 EMP and for a core t2 emp..
Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations
Wut? I remember I once got accused by Beh for never playing Core, now I get accused by you for playing Core too much. I play both factions equally. WHAT AM I DOING WRONGalbator wrote:Ofc Jazz "forgot" to mention that since he likes to play core so much....

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations
It was ironic...Jazcash wrote:Wut? I remember I once got accused by Beh for never playing Core, now I get accused by you for playing Core too much. I play both factions equally. WHAT AM I DOING WRONGalbator wrote:Ofc Jazz "forgot" to mention that since he likes to play core so much....
Was not it obivous ?
Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations
Not reallyalbator wrote: It was ironic...
Was not it obivous ?

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations
Guys this thread is not to discuss balance. TFC is doing EA now so you can discuss balance changes with him if you wish for EA
Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations
Arm shouldn't get an EMP unit, the differences between the factions are what make them unique and interesting, if we start to give everything a parallel they'll be even more similar than they already are. They should be separated farther if anything.KaiserJ wrote:i'm against nerfing bladewings; i think ARM could have an equivalent unit, maybe a hovercraft EMP flying bomb
blades are more effective in teamgames, but i think i've seen banshees win enough smaller games via surprise attack that it balances out in my mind
if blades could actually kill, that would be different
Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations
Since you can't possibly be talking about balance as this is not a balance thread, I will accept your nomination for 'Arm EMP Unit' to be on the balance panel. I am sure he possibly will make a fine addition to the teamHobo Joe wrote:Arm shouldn't get an EMP unit, the differences between the factions are what make them unique and interesting, if we start to give everything a parallel they'll be even more similar than they already are. They should be separated farther if anything.KaiserJ wrote:i'm against nerfing bladewings; i think ARM could have an equivalent unit, maybe a hovercraft EMP flying bomb
blades are more effective in teamgames, but i think i've seen banshees win enough smaller games via surprise attack that it balances out in my mind
if blades could actually kill, that would be different
Re: Balanced Annihilation II Goals + Nominations
I didn't leave. I browse these forums daily, I'm just not on lobby often.Nixa wrote:As most know Regret has left
>_>
Re: BA II Goals + Nominations
Then speak up, I heard wispers you'd died 

Re: BA II Goals + Nominations
He was actually here, editing your posts.
Re: BA II Goals + Nominations
:3Neddie wrote:He was actually here, editing your posts.