BA II Goals + Nominations - Page 2

BA II Goals + Nominations

Classic game design, maintained to please you...

Moderator: Content Developer

User avatar
Jazcash
Posts: 5309
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 17:39

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations

Post by Jazcash »

Hobo Joe wrote:bladwings would cost twice as much and move half as fast and build twice as slow and be half as effective.
Nah they'd just be T3.
HectorMeyer
Posts: 181
Joined: 13 Jan 2009, 11:20

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations

Post by HectorMeyer »

give bladewings a limited supply of shots (like 20 or 30) and then a minute cooldown period, so a stumpy army can't be permastunned anymore.

that way they remain the same when used for preparing attacks or stopping pushes on the defenses, but give raids a chance to escape if they dont get taken out fast after being stunned.

i am thinking of a similar system for the vulcan btw.
User avatar
albator
Posts: 866
Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 14:20

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations

Post by albator »

Jazcash wrote:
albator wrote:For balance, I am up too. Someone need to counter balance jaz for his will to make anygame ba game an only-stump-game anyway... :p
:P

I'm actually quite fair and discrete about balance changes tbh, I wouldn't be some kind of mass modifying pirate.

Image
Units take 25% less EMP damage while moving.
- Core Bladewing reload time increased (1.2->1.5) (25%)

-> virtual cost (for same efficiency) increased by 50% !!!!!
highest bluff of all the EA change...

still :
Jazcash wrote:There's so many *A's, I don't even know which way to look.
I appreciate most of these balance changes though. Although, Bladewings could use a bit more of a nerf than that :P
Also:
- Arm Maverick reload time reduced (0.945->0.9)
I lol'd :mrgreen:
User avatar
KaiserJ
Community Representative
Posts: 3113
Joined: 08 Sep 2008, 22:59

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations

Post by KaiserJ »

i'm against nerfing bladewings; i think ARM could have an equivalent unit, maybe a hovercraft EMP flying bomb

blades are more effective in teamgames, but i think i've seen banshees win enough smaller games via surprise attack that it balances out in my mind

if blades could actually kill, that would be different
User avatar
albator
Posts: 866
Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 14:20

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations

Post by albator »

KaiserJ wrote:i'm against nerfing bladewings; i think ARM could have an equivalent unit, maybe a hovercraft EMP flying bomb

blades are more effective in teamgames, but i think i've seen banshees win enough smaller games via surprise attack that it balances out in my mind

if blades could actually kill, that would be different
I couldnot agree more. Global core EMP ability is acutally far lower than arm that have t2 trans that stun realy easily unit like goliat, or t2 EMP bomber that is the best unit to counter T3 spam... Ofc Jazz "forgot" to mention that since he likes to play core so much...

If there was a nerf that had to be done on any EMP unit, it would be ARM t2 trans, not blades.

I am actually for an arm t1 EMP and for a core t2 emp..
User avatar
Jazcash
Posts: 5309
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 17:39

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations

Post by Jazcash »

albator wrote:Ofc Jazz "forgot" to mention that since he likes to play core so much....
Wut? I remember I once got accused by Beh for never playing Core, now I get accused by you for playing Core too much. I play both factions equally. WHAT AM I DOING WRONG :cry:
User avatar
albator
Posts: 866
Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 14:20

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations

Post by albator »

Jazcash wrote:
albator wrote:Ofc Jazz "forgot" to mention that since he likes to play core so much....
Wut? I remember I once got accused by Beh for never playing Core, now I get accused by you for playing Core too much. I play both factions equally. WHAT AM I DOING WRONG :cry:
It was ironic...

Was not it obivous ?
User avatar
Jazcash
Posts: 5309
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 17:39

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations

Post by Jazcash »

albator wrote: It was ironic...

Was not it obivous ?
Not really :?
User avatar
Nixa
Posts: 350
Joined: 05 Oct 2006, 04:32

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations

Post by Nixa »

Guys this thread is not to discuss balance. TFC is doing EA now so you can discuss balance changes with him if you wish for EA
User avatar
Hobo Joe
Posts: 1001
Joined: 02 Jan 2008, 21:55

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations

Post by Hobo Joe »

KaiserJ wrote:i'm against nerfing bladewings; i think ARM could have an equivalent unit, maybe a hovercraft EMP flying bomb

blades are more effective in teamgames, but i think i've seen banshees win enough smaller games via surprise attack that it balances out in my mind

if blades could actually kill, that would be different
Arm shouldn't get an EMP unit, the differences between the factions are what make them unique and interesting, if we start to give everything a parallel they'll be even more similar than they already are. They should be separated farther if anything.
User avatar
Nixa
Posts: 350
Joined: 05 Oct 2006, 04:32

Re: Balanced Annihilation Reloaded Goals + Nominations

Post by Nixa »

Hobo Joe wrote:
KaiserJ wrote:i'm against nerfing bladewings; i think ARM could have an equivalent unit, maybe a hovercraft EMP flying bomb

blades are more effective in teamgames, but i think i've seen banshees win enough smaller games via surprise attack that it balances out in my mind

if blades could actually kill, that would be different
Arm shouldn't get an EMP unit, the differences between the factions are what make them unique and interesting, if we start to give everything a parallel they'll be even more similar than they already are. They should be separated farther if anything.
Since you can't possibly be talking about balance as this is not a balance thread, I will accept your nomination for 'Arm EMP Unit' to be on the balance panel. I am sure he possibly will make a fine addition to the team
Regret
Posts: 2086
Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 19:04

Re: Balanced Annihilation II Goals + Nominations

Post by Regret »

Nixa wrote:As most know Regret has left
I didn't leave. I browse these forums daily, I'm just not on lobby often.

>_>
User avatar
Nixa
Posts: 350
Joined: 05 Oct 2006, 04:32

Re: BA II Goals + Nominations

Post by Nixa »

Then speak up, I heard wispers you'd died :cry:
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Re: BA II Goals + Nominations

Post by Neddie »

He was actually here, editing your posts.
Regret
Posts: 2086
Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 19:04

Re: BA II Goals + Nominations

Post by Regret »

Neddie wrote:He was actually here, editing your posts.
:3
Post Reply

Return to “Balanced Annihilation”