Talk:Spring MT

Why is this unofficial?

The code is more complex and some of the project members do not like this.

Is the above really necessary? Seems like drama and honestly doesn't belong in the wiki Smoth (talk) 22:42, 14 March 2013 (CET)

removed the above Smoth (talk) 22:48, 14 March 2013 (CET)

---

I concur. Also I'm unsure if we shouldn't have a policy about talk pages (forum is superior in most respects) -- FLOZi 22:58, 14 March 2013 (CET) ...else banned from forum ! --Emmanuel (talk) 01:09, 27 March 2013 (CET)

what ^QTPFS ?

i bet this sentence apply only for moddevelopers : " The Default pathfinder is recommended because the QTPFS pathfinder tends to kill the performance of _{Spring MT}."

^QTPFS:

• pro: ?
• con: we know now!

what Spring MT ?

• pro:100% better than spring single thread and unknow better from MultiThreaded
• con:useless with (the unknow but new !)^QTPFS

the BA tournement :

• • • is your BA tournement will be a DsD map or more?
    • maybe "Spring MT" make more larger maps PLAYABLES ?

^{64*64 for exemple}