Suggestion for a future mod

Suggestion for a future mod

Discuss game development here, from a distinct game project to an accessible third-party mutator, down to the interaction and design of individual units if you like.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply

Like those ideas?

Yes!
3
19%
Just the one about rockets collecting metal in space.
5
31%
Just the one about bases in space and bases in land to attack em.
0
No votes
No.
8
50%
 
Total votes: 16

manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Suggestion for a future mod

Post by manored »

How about putting, in some future mod, an espacial center that can send rockets to the space so they can return with metal? It would be also interesting to do spacial bases to collect energy and spy enemys (not attack that would make most defensive things useless), but then there would be also the possibily of making in land radars that cant detect enemy buildings on space and in land missile bases that can make missiles to blast those buildings out of the space.
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

Sure, none of those are feasible, and once you understand physics and chemistry - well, really nothing in a science fiction/future RTS is - I think the collection from space would be a nice way to replace the conventional metal maker.
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

Eh, theoeretically (and this is VERY theoretically, mind you), the TA "metal maker" would be possible... if our friends in the Arm and the Core have made breakthroughs that make femtotechnology possible (this is the step beyond the step beyond nanotechnology - remember, we're only beginning to touch the surface of nanotechnology, so this theoretically is very far in the future), it could draw air from the atmosphere or dirt from the ground and fuse the atoms in it together to create whatever metal "metal" is.

As I said, this is VERY theoretical. According to our current understanding oh physics, it would take a HUGE amount of energy to trigger this sort of fusion. Obviously they've discovered a lower-energy way to do it!
User avatar
mehere101
Posts: 293
Joined: 15 Mar 2006, 02:38

Post by mehere101 »

Or the TA unit of energy is equal to about the draw of New York for a minute...
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

I like both of those comments.
manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Post by manored »

neddiedrow wrote:Sure, none of those are feasible, and once you understand physics and chemistry - well, really nothing in a science fiction/future RTS is - I think the collection from space would be a nice way to replace the conventional metal maker.
I didnt got it. how can those things be not feasible if we already have spy sattelites feeded by solar energy and rockets that can reach the space in real life? the only thing surreal on it its the outspace metal collecting.
User avatar
Deathblane
Posts: 505
Joined: 01 Feb 2006, 01:22

Post by Deathblane »

Yeah, the way I always rationalised MM (and Fusions) was that 'metal' only consists of some elements, so the MM just fuses/fissions useless elements together while the fusion reactor fuses them for power.

Thing about that rationalisation is that in fairly short order (probably a couple of days) you could process an entire planet into 'metal' using TA build times.
User avatar
AF
AI Developer
Posts: 20687
Joined: 14 Sep 2004, 11:32

Post by AF »

I'd say that using energy to construct basic hydrogen out fo electrons and protons, then fusing into more complex elements via nuclear fusion would be more likely
User avatar
BlackLiger
Posts: 1371
Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 21:58

Post by BlackLiger »

The OTA manual mentions that the 'metal' you collect is actually just the rare elements needed for nanotechnology....
User avatar
Zoombie
Posts: 6149
Joined: 15 Mar 2005, 07:08

Post by Zoombie »

I also have to raise the point that it's a game, and via game logic, if it looks cool...it works!
manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Post by manored »

Yeah. If in the game the commander points his army to someplace and a solar collector "jumps" out of his hand, why there shouldnt be something capable of turning energy into metal?
User avatar
Comp1337
Posts: 2434
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 17:32

Post by Comp1337 »

Zoombie wrote:I also have to raise the point that it's a game, and via game logic, if it looks cool...it works!
+1
Finally someone who understands the laws of computer gaming.
User avatar
zwzsg
Kernel Panic Co-Developer
Posts: 7052
Joined: 16 Nov 2004, 13:08

Re: Suggestion for a future mod

Post by zwzsg »

manored wrote:How about putting, in some future mod, an espacial center that can send rockets to the space so they can return with metal? It would be also interesting to do spacial bases to collect energy and spy enemys (not attack that would make most defensive things useless), but then there would be also the possibily of making in land radars that cant detect enemy buildings on space and in land missile bases that can make missiles to blast those buildings out of the space.
espacial?

Anyhow, that really reminds me of Metal Fatigue and its orbital plane. Who else played it?
User avatar
Argh
Posts: 10920
Joined: 21 Feb 2005, 03:38

Post by Argh »

Metal Fatigue was one of the biggest, "it could've been decent" games. I still think it was one of the more interesting RTS games ever made. Too bad it was so fundamentally flawed :P
User avatar
Strategia
Posts: 575
Joined: 06 Apr 2006, 18:32

Post by Strategia »

manored wrote:
neddiedrow wrote:Sure, none of those are feasible, and once you understand physics and chemistry - well, really nothing in a science fiction/future RTS is - I think the collection from space would be a nice way to replace the conventional metal maker.
I didnt got it. how can those things be not feasible if we already have spy sattelites feeded by solar energy and rockets that can reach the space in real life? the only thing surreal on it its the outspace metal collecting.
I think that by "not feasible" he meant "not feasible to mod".
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

In reality it isn't sustainable, though, and the metal collection is absolutely insane. But yes, I was referring to modding feasibility.
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Post by rattle »

Argh wrote:Metal Fatigue was one of the biggest, "it could've been decent" games. I still think it was one of the more interesting RTS games ever made. Too bad it was so fundamentally flawed :P
You can say that about everything psygnosis made but I bought the game... *puts head in shame*
Post Reply

Return to “Game Development”