http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2009/0 ... urder.html
It's an interesting article. How accurate do you think it is?
Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama
He lumps together all meta as useless drivel - while management, planning, discussion are all key meta elements that are necessary.
Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama
Does this count as meta:
This forum likes to discuss
1) how awesome old stuff was (ie E&E)
2) how awesome future stuff will be (ie Imperial Winter)
3) How BA could be made more like XY
While in the meantime the present (games that are already playable) does not get talked about so much.
This forum likes to discuss
1) how awesome old stuff was (ie E&E)
2) how awesome future stuff will be (ie Imperial Winter)
3) How BA could be made more like XY
While in the meantime the present (games that are already playable) does not get talked about so much.
Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama
Can we have a forumticker with exotic open games currently searching for players?
Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama
Meta only matters when the spring forum moderators can be arsed/newly appointed.
The only fix is either a constant influx of moderators refreshing the entire board every 4 months, or brainwashing and energy drinks.
Good old fashioned technical innovation was never an option here, making all of Jeff Attwoods points utterly innaccesible
The only fix is either a constant influx of moderators refreshing the entire board every 4 months, or brainwashing and energy drinks.
Good old fashioned technical innovation was never an option here, making all of Jeff Attwoods points utterly innaccesible
Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama
I asked, "how accurate do you think this is?" because I don't quite agree with Atwood. I don't think all meta is bad or that meta does really kill communities, as long as there's a healthy amount of signal (not-meta discussion) keeping things on track. I think the whole purpose of the meta discussion is to improve communities' power to attract and retain new members, and I don't think a little meta would really interfere with that, as long as it hasn't overrun the rest of the community.
I'm also behind what Beherith said.
I'm also behind what Beherith said.
Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama
He is lumping too much into meta. It's like listening to those idiots who love to throw around buzzwords. Article was a waste of time
Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama
Ok, so he says himself meta-blogging is "incredibly boring". How boring is blogging about meta-blogging (meta-meta-blogging)?
Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama
I found that an incredibly boring read.
Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama
has there ever been a blog post that was interessting to read?
Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama
Its alll your fault, wouldnt you be so tremendous good drama actors, and notepad++ being so unseductive, i would have acomplished lots of stuff.
Also, i think its the desks under the mouse of players that cost us the our playerbase. If we would ship handcarved woooden dsd mousepads, everything would be diffrent.
Also, i think its the desks under the mouse of players that cost us the our playerbase. If we would ship handcarved woooden dsd mousepads, everything would be diffrent.