Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post just about everything that isn't directly related to Spring here!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
MidKnight
Posts: 2652
Joined: 10 Sep 2008, 03:11

Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post by MidKnight »

http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2009/0 ... urder.html

It's an interesting article. How accurate do you think it is?
User avatar
Beherith
Posts: 5145
Joined: 26 Oct 2007, 16:21

Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post by Beherith »

He lumps together all meta as useless drivel - while management, planning, discussion are all key meta elements that are necessary.
User avatar
knorke
Posts: 7971
Joined: 22 Feb 2006, 01:02

Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post by knorke »

Does this count as meta:
This forum likes to discuss
1) how awesome old stuff was (ie E&E)
2) how awesome future stuff will be (ie Imperial Winter)
3) How BA could be made more like XY
While in the meantime the present (games that are already playable) does not get talked about so much.
User avatar
PicassoCT
Journeywar Developer & Mapper
Posts: 10454
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 21:12

Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post by PicassoCT »

Can we have a forumticker with exotic open games currently searching for players?
User avatar
AF
AI Developer
Posts: 20687
Joined: 14 Sep 2004, 11:32

Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post by AF »

Meta only matters when the spring forum moderators can be arsed/newly appointed.

The only fix is either a constant influx of moderators refreshing the entire board every 4 months, or brainwashing and energy drinks.

Good old fashioned technical innovation was never an option here, making all of Jeff Attwoods points utterly innaccesible
User avatar
MidKnight
Posts: 2652
Joined: 10 Sep 2008, 03:11

Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post by MidKnight »

I asked, "how accurate do you think this is?" because I don't quite agree with Atwood. I don't think all meta is bad or that meta does really kill communities, as long as there's a healthy amount of signal (not-meta discussion) keeping things on track. I think the whole purpose of the meta discussion is to improve communities' power to attract and retain new members, and I don't think a little meta would really interfere with that, as long as it hasn't overrun the rest of the community.

I'm also behind what Beherith said.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post by smoth »

He is lumping too much into meta. It's like listening to those idiots who love to throw around buzzwords. Article was a waste of time
User avatar
Teutooni
Posts: 717
Joined: 01 Dec 2007, 17:21

Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post by Teutooni »

Ok, so he says himself meta-blogging is "incredibly boring". How boring is blogging about meta-blogging (meta-meta-blogging)?
User avatar
Cheesecan
Posts: 1571
Joined: 07 Feb 2005, 21:30

Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post by Cheesecan »

I found that an incredibly boring read.
User avatar
knorke
Posts: 7971
Joined: 22 Feb 2006, 01:02

Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post by knorke »

has there ever been a blog post that was interessting to read?
User avatar
PicassoCT
Journeywar Developer & Mapper
Posts: 10454
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 21:12

Re: Jeff Atwood on Forum Drama

Post by PicassoCT »

Its alll your fault, wouldnt you be so tremendous good drama actors, and notepad++ being so unseductive, i would have acomplished lots of stuff.

Also, i think its the desks under the mouse of players that cost us the our playerbase. If we would ship handcarved woooden dsd mousepads, everything would be diffrent.
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”