I've had some spare time so I've tried to make the wiki looks better - if it doesn't feel free to revert it back. BA's WIKI
Basically I reorganized the structure to better suit it's purpose and added some stuff, so it SHOULD guide newbs better.
Don't mind the sucky img, cause I don't have access to the original vec logo file. It just deserves some pixels imho. So I just copy/paste a loadscreen.
Just my 2 cents.
BA's wiki
Moderator: Content Developer
Re: BA's wiki
" * Units/structures statistics (like HP, dmg, etc.) are slightly different in BA. "
Whoever wrote that line never played OTA.
Whoever wrote that line never played OTA.
Re: BA's wiki
I did 
Removed "slightly", because you are right, sometimes the changes were drastic.
Removed "slightly", because you are right, sometimes the changes were drastic.Re: BA's wiki
What is it supposed to be, a guide or an introduction to BA? And for OTA players coming to BA/Spring or people who didn't play BA?
It might be best not to have both within one page, things such as "Main differences to OTA", there are quite a few, like, loads of added units, which may clog up the page.
It might be best not to have both within one page, things such as "Main differences to OTA", there are quite a few, like, loads of added units, which may clog up the page.
Re: BA's wiki
Yea, I support the idea of forking it to sub-pages by section. But I rly don't know if a random guy should do this...babbles wrote:What is it supposed to be, a guide or an introduction to BA? And for OTA players coming to BA/Spring or people who didn't play BA?
It might be best not to have both within one page, things such as "Main differences to OTA", there are quite a few, like, loads of added units, which may clog up the page.
The main BA page == BA history, short description + links.
Other pages == guide, OTA changes, etc.
Last edited by Yuri on 01 Oct 2010, 20:31, edited 1 time in total.
Re: BA's wiki
Who would be a non-random guy then?
Re: BA's wiki
Dunno who is not, I'm a random guy for instance. I just saw a notice about terrible state of BA's wiki. So I've improved it to look a little bit friendlier.
Re: BA's wiki
I think the main thing is the presentation of it and getting the right balance between content and length. I contemplated editting the BA wiki page when I did the XTA one, as I looked at it for ideas but saw it was in worst shape. I didn't think it was my place to edit it though, given that I play hardly any of it. Good luck though.
Re: BA's wiki
Well, I can fork the main page to:
Main page redone: only an epic logo img, Overview, History, Links and Legal paragraphs
OTA to BA shift page: Main differences OTA vs BA + link to "shared" + requires adding a list of new units, etc.
TA universe noob's page: starting with the link to old TA Spring wiki page + some overhaul to this old page later + current Strategies section to begin with + possibly more content to this section + link to "shared"
"Shared" section: Spring Controls introduced, Co-op, Chicken defense articles, etc.
Also BA imo need some portion of cool pics /same as "the loadscreen ones"/ for some visual attraction.
Main page redone: only an epic logo img, Overview, History, Links and Legal paragraphs
OTA to BA shift page: Main differences OTA vs BA + link to "shared" + requires adding a list of new units, etc.
TA universe noob's page: starting with the link to old TA Spring wiki page + some overhaul to this old page later + current Strategies section to begin with + possibly more content to this section + link to "shared"
"Shared" section: Spring Controls introduced, Co-op, Chicken defense articles, etc.
Also BA imo need some portion of cool pics /same as "the loadscreen ones"/ for some visual attraction.
Re: BA's wiki
OK, I tried to do my best fork the main page to be more clear and simple.
It's just a muster how it should be sectioned.
Opinions?
It's just a muster how it should be sectioned.
Opinions?