Absolute Annihilation: Spring 1.46 - Page 53

Absolute Annihilation: Spring 1.46

All game release threads should be posted here

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

I mainly used it in relation to micro'ed Brawlers and Cruise Missiles.
User avatar
Cabbage
Posts: 1548
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 22:34

Post by Cabbage »

erf dont buff guardian high tradjectory :x

It's fine as it is, yes you can get a better DPS in low tradjectory, but in a guardian war i would almost always go for high - the extra dmg and AoE from each shot can easily wipe out any cons the enemy has if you aim well.
User avatar
MR.D
Posts: 1527
Joined: 06 Aug 2005, 13:15

Post by MR.D »

High angle is outstanding as it is, and it does an awesome job at keeping cons busy shuffling around and is able to splash a wide area with its shots.

The low angle shot on the otherhand seems to be lacking, for such a spendy lvl1 investment, its shots are pretty slow and hard to hit even light tanks at their slower speeds, doesn't have a large enough blast radius to counter for near misses, and is fairly weak IMO.

For a weapon that costs that much to build using a LVL1 economy, it would be really nice if it could kill 1 AK/Peewee in 1 shot in low angle, they're a small and fast target, and if you're lucky enough to plant 1 good shot on a pewee you should be rewarded with a kill as those units are the lightest ones next to a jeffy or flea.

As an added bonus, if its worth looking into or trying for 1 release, an increase of travel speed for the guardian shell in Low angle could be a nice improvement as well, leaving high angle as a slow lobbing artillery.
User avatar
Soulless1
Posts: 444
Joined: 07 Mar 2006, 03:29

Post by Soulless1 »

I'd say reduce the damage of the low arc shot and increase its rate of fire (such that DPS is roughly what it is now, maybe a teensy bit less) and make the projectile travel faster.

High arc is good as-is.
Andreask
Posts: 282
Joined: 16 Dec 2005, 21:08

Post by Andreask »

You guys remember the times when the Punisher and Guardians only had the low trajectory and were dubbed:

Unit-eater ?
User avatar
Deathblane
Posts: 505
Joined: 01 Feb 2006, 01:22

Post by Deathblane »

Can I just say that nukes work brilliantly now. Played a game last night (on Horst and Graben) that turned into a nuke-fest. The anti-nuke defences work great but aren't all powerfull like they were before.
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

OKIES! Got an idea, I did! Muahaha. For L3 vehicle imbalance thing.

I typed it up just now, but realized it was too awesome to be posted on a forum. The universe would implode 8 times, spinning in a row.
User avatar
NOiZE
Balanced Annihilation Developer
Posts: 3984
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 19:29

Post by NOiZE »

I rather see other things "fixed" tbh
User avatar
Machiosabre
Posts: 1474
Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56

Post by Machiosabre »

does it involve dinosaurs of any kind? :shock:
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

Yeah yeah yeah. Fixes too. Read everything up to this point now, everything taken into consideration. How long should I wait until I make the next update? It'll be another minor one, mostly balance changes but also somewhere between 2 and 6 new units. I've lost all motivation to get the anti-air kbots working for the moment. Working a lot on GEM.
User avatar
NOiZE
Balanced Annihilation Developer
Posts: 3984
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 19:29

Post by NOiZE »

Well 1.46 is pretty good already... no need to rush IMO
User avatar
Zenka
Posts: 1235
Joined: 05 Oct 2005, 15:29

Post by Zenka »

NOiZE wrote:Well 1.46 is pretty good already... no need to rush IMO
Apart for the current cruize missles. Yeah 1.46 is pritty good.
User avatar
Cabbage
Posts: 1548
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 22:34

Post by Cabbage »

Apart for the current cruize missles. Yeah 1.46 is pritty good.
I saw a post saying that next spring version, that can be adressed (new tag) :p
User avatar
ginekolog
Posts: 837
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 13:49

Post by ginekolog »

i agree here, 1.46 looks preety balanced atm. Lets leave it here some time.
Leaderz0rz
Posts: 100
Joined: 07 Feb 2006, 21:35

Post by Leaderz0rz »

punisher/guardians are fine the way they are.
User avatar
BigSteve
Posts: 911
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 12:56

Post by BigSteve »

The high trajectory mode of the plasma cannons (guard/punisher) has little real use, except firing over hills/walls.
Riiiigghht.... not useful... oookkkkaaayyy. How long have you been playing this game Nemo? manual target ^^ aim into the path of an oncoming bunch of units.. then you shall see the true power that is high trajectory rawr!!
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

Hm.. think I'm going to have to make a patch. I've got a ton of good ideas all of the sudden. Not sure when it'll be ready.

edit: oh, I'll wait until the next version of Spring. That way I can have proper EMP with the next release. Maybe that'll give me some time for the anti-air kbots and hovercomms.
User avatar
NOiZE
Balanced Annihilation Developer
Posts: 3984
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 19:29

Post by NOiZE »

Tell us your idea's so we can either look forward to them, or bash them :-)
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

So they can be stolen by Sony? No thanks. :P Maybe a little bit later.

Edit: better yet, get your coward ass on MSN so I can kick it in Spring!

Edit2: Hm. defeated twice in a row. I think I must have a virus.. uh... yeah.
Leaderz0rz
Posts: 100
Joined: 07 Feb 2006, 21:35

Post by Leaderz0rz »

Yea caydr those virii are really bad :(
Locked

Return to “Game Releases”