Battlfeild

Zoombie · Post by **Zoombie** » 21 Mar 2006, 05:55

hehehhhehe...this game makes sick, tiwsted sence.

First there was Battlefield 1942. Set in the past this game was a BLAST!

Then there was Battefeild 2. Set in the present, this game was gritty and very very very very fun!

now...there is what deserves to come next...

Battlefeild:2142

GrOuNd_ZeRo · Post by **GrOuNd_ZeRo** » 21 Mar 2006, 12:38

*snickers* c'mon, how many times do I have to say that Mech will NEVER HAPPEN, they are completely impractical, a tank is much simpler and much easier to put armor plating on, a mech is just TOO fragile.

Well atleast it isn't battlefield Fanstasy or something...and why do games always have to be set in the 22nd century? mid/late 21st century would be adequat for the technology shown.

definitly not a game I will get, I like my modern non-imagined stuff better.

Masse · Post by **Masse** » 21 Mar 2006, 12:47

yay mechs

mechs wont happen untill we can get em move like humans

when they can dodge bullets there's no reason to have bulky tanks

and zoombie u wrote Battlefield correctly only once out of 4

GrOuNd_ZeRo · Post by **GrOuNd_ZeRo** » 21 Mar 2006, 12:50

Man, I think he's competing with AF for the worst speller...

Zoombie · Post by **Zoombie** » 21 Mar 2006, 15:14

Heu! it'vs noht my fauly my fingers are rotting while i ytpe!

Also, as i've said before, who CARE'S if mech's make sence. They are cool!

Andreask · Post by **Andreask** » 21 Mar 2006, 18:36

Zoombie, i wonder, do you anything else right now than copy and past links to trailers for video games into this forum?

Please, open one thread, call its "Trailer-Park" and post every new trailer you find in there.

Thanks.

FizWizz · Post by **FizWizz** » 21 Mar 2006, 19:05

I'm split on mechs. The walkers in that BF:2142 trailer don't look that bad (except, they are armed with Gatling guns as a primary weapon?) because they don't try to be outlandish. What I don't like (read: despise with a passion) are really flashy amazingly ridiculously nonsensical anime BS mechs.

FireCrack · Post by **FireCrack** » 21 Mar 2006, 21:20

Personaly, i prefer hovertanks to mechs any day.

BlackLiger · Post by **BlackLiger** » 22 Mar 2006, 18:51

I could see a practical side to mechs if they acted like the Core Gimp, and were amphibious AND under the water... Say a tank couldn't do that... then mechs that could would be the epitome of sea based assault stealth... Combined with a first wave of hovers, that engage the enemy defences, your heavy stuff comes marching out not long after, then your airdrops arrive....

GrOuNd_ZeRo · Post by **GrOuNd_ZeRo** » 23 Mar 2006, 02:46

I agree with firecrack, hover tanks are the future, you can armor a tank more and esspecially hover tanks, the only thing that would rival is a mech with a jump jet which is VERY unlikely, maybe a hover mech then?

Das Bruce · Post by **Das Bruce** » 23 Mar 2006, 03:46

Battlefield series has been going downhill since 1945.

GrOuNd_ZeRo · Post by **GrOuNd_ZeRo** » 23 Mar 2006, 05:59

Battlefield 2 wasn't too bad, I did miss blood and gore though, damn EA always want to make their war games kid friendly...

Zoombie · Post by **Zoombie** » 23 Mar 2006, 07:27

The lack of blood in 2 was not a good in BF2.

Masse · Post by **Masse** » 23 Mar 2006, 14:15

WHAT NO BLOOD

i've never tried it and now i have no reason to try

we need BLOOD and GORE

Sheekel · Post by **Sheekel** » 24 Mar 2006, 19:25

that just looks like a reskinned BF2.

I hated the multiplayer client system in BF2. uggg

Caydr · Post by **Caydr** » 25 Mar 2006, 21:11

What the?! Oh cmon. I do a search for "battlefield 2142", then finding no results I post a topic about it. Please proofread.....

Spring RTS Engine

Battlfeild

Battlfeild