Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
Moderator: Moderators
Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
Which lobby would you want?
the one with lots of features?
or the one with swish uber graphics that's easy to use?
the one with lots of features?
or the one with swish uber graphics that's easy to use?
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
imbaczek wrote:both?
- Machiosabre
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
whichever one comes with spring.
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
springlobby.
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
The features I want with a good UI.
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
dizekat wrote:springlobby.
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
The one with graphics which integrate best with the rest of my applications and which also has all features I want accessible in a user friendly way 

Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
dizekat wrote:springlobby.
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
Yes but which would you value most?
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
Both but If I need to decide:"the one with lots of features?" I would choose.
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
The lack of either brings an application's usefulness down several orders of magnitude
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
Which one doesn't bloat up with in-use memory? Leaks are acceptable as long as they are left in swap where they belong.
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
maybe "what I like" format would better describe my feelings:
what I like about tasclient:
- fast and responsive (subjectively the quickest-responding lobby around)
- advanced battle filtering
- multiline paste (recent addition)
- springdownloader integration
what I like about springlobby:
- ability to make user groups (highlight a set of users using different colors, offline/online notifications, etc.)
- built-in torrent system (doesn't work for me on windows though)
what I don't like about tasclient:
- fragile - likes to crash when some files are gone (tips.txt e.g., guess that was fixed)
- battle ui - got used to it, but it definitely could be better, could use space better
- replay list (haven't looked at it for some time, would like a map/mod/player filter, if it's there - strike this one out)
- connect button - first time I've seen it I had no idea what it does or even if it was clickable, good thing the connect dialog now opens automatically on startup
what I don't like about springlobby:
- sluggish at times - updating battle list and battle UI seems wasteful
- even more fragile than tasclient, albeit for different reasons
- useful options are added, but GUI for them feels out of place at times (e.g. user group UI is cluttered)
- OTOH battle UI feels like there's too much tabs, doesn't have an overview tab which would display most/all important info about a battle on a single tab
what I like about tasclient:
- fast and responsive (subjectively the quickest-responding lobby around)
- advanced battle filtering
- multiline paste (recent addition)
- springdownloader integration
what I like about springlobby:
- ability to make user groups (highlight a set of users using different colors, offline/online notifications, etc.)
- built-in torrent system (doesn't work for me on windows though)
what I don't like about tasclient:
- fragile - likes to crash when some files are gone (tips.txt e.g., guess that was fixed)
- battle ui - got used to it, but it definitely could be better, could use space better
- replay list (haven't looked at it for some time, would like a map/mod/player filter, if it's there - strike this one out)
- connect button - first time I've seen it I had no idea what it does or even if it was clickable, good thing the connect dialog now opens automatically on startup
what I don't like about springlobby:
- sluggish at times - updating battle list and battle UI seems wasteful
- even more fragile than tasclient, albeit for different reasons
- useful options are added, but GUI for them feels out of place at times (e.g. user group UI is cluttered)
- OTOH battle UI feels like there's too much tabs, doesn't have an overview tab which would display most/all important info about a battle on a single tab
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
dizekat wrote:springlobby.
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
OMG !!! how dare you !imbaczek wrote:what I like about springlobby:
- ability to make user groups (highlight a set of users using different colors, offline/online notifications, etc.)
-
- Posts: 196
- Joined: 25 Jan 2008, 20:04
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
Both, and I would like less bugs slowness in map changing/and such.
Also, thank you for what we already have 


- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
Satirik wrote:OMG !!! how dare you !imbaczek wrote:what I like about springlobby:
- ability to make user groups (highlight a set of users using different colors, offline/online notifications, etc.)
Yes tasclient does this, but springlobby does it much better. Tasclient's groups are... Shaky. It likes to forget often... SO often in fact that I stopped using them.
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
AF, usability has more than "lack of features and pretty graphics".
For instance there's:
For instance there's:
- Discoverability: how obvious it is to a first time user to find some functionality
- Intuitiveness: if functionality works in a way that's easy to learn and remember (otherwise the user has to read the manual every time they reuse the app)
- Consistency: eg search boxes go in the upper right of your application, by convention, the X button closes unless it can minimize to system tray
- Functionality: A microwave that lets you control how long it will be on is better than one with just an on/off switch
Re: Pretty Easy to use Vs Lots of Features
i have the same groups from the first day i added that feature and it never forgot anything ... the groups are saved when closing the lobby, if you kill it or if it crashes completly it won't save the changesForboding Angel wrote:Satirik wrote:OMG !!! how dare you !imbaczek wrote:what I like about springlobby:
- ability to make user groups (highlight a set of users using different colors, offline/online notifications, etc.)
Yes tasclient does this, but springlobby does it much better. Tasclient's groups are... Shaky. It likes to forget often... SO often in fact that I stopped using them.