Inapropriate wiki edit. - Page 2

Inapropriate wiki edit.

Various things about Spring that do not fit in any of the other forums listed below, including forum rules.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
clericvash
Posts: 1394
Joined: 05 Oct 2004, 01:05

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by clericvash »

Uh what? We all know the TA mods aren't exactly legal since the models, names and side logos are not from this community.
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by rattle »

Which is why there is a reminder somewhere that you need to own a copy of TA in order to download games with OTA content or the base archive.
User avatar
Pressure Line
Posts: 2283
Joined: 21 May 2007, 02:09

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Pressure Line »

rattle wrote:Which is why there is a reminder somewhere that you need to own a copy of TA in order to download games with OTA content or the base archive.
http://spring.clan-sy.com/download.php wrote:Please note that by selecting the mods XTA or BA in the installer you are legally required to own the original total annihilation game.
User avatar
pharoph
Posts: 408
Joined: 16 Jan 2008, 02:04

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by pharoph »

lots of people dont get that. thats because ive never een it anywhere. someone told me. but i have OTA to bad i lost the missions disk T_T
User avatar
pharoph
Posts: 408
Joined: 16 Jan 2008, 02:04

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by pharoph »

clericvash wrote:Well you didn't say yours had a "tm" by it, i mean for the ta mods, since they all contain copyrighted content, people should be properly told about it.
wait can anybody tell me why is is illegal to download spring without OTA on the computer? tatel lighten up the idea alot.
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Hoi »

the *a mods are illegal, cuz they depend on otacontent.sdz, its legally requierd that you have ota if you want to use the content
User avatar
Pressure Line
Posts: 2283
Joined: 21 May 2007, 02:09

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Pressure Line »

pharoph wrote:
clericvash wrote:Well you didn't say yours had a "tm" by it, i mean for the ta mods, since they all contain copyrighted content, people should be properly told about it.
wait can anybody tell me why is is illegal to download spring without OTA on the computer? tatel lighten up the idea alot.
not reqired to have it on their pc, only to own a copy, like my original 1997 set (still have the box ^_^)
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Hoi »

me too, but i lost the missions cd ^^
User avatar
pharoph
Posts: 408
Joined: 16 Jan 2008, 02:04

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by pharoph »

ME TO!

skirmishes are so much fun!
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Hoi »

but missions are fun too! but i would prefer skirmish above missions,also becaus you cant do multiplayer without cd1
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by KDR_11k »

Actually it's false, it doesn't matter if you own OTA or not. Uploading any OTA deriative is copyright infringement. Downloading depends on the laws in your country, some ban downloading too, some don't.
User avatar
LordMatt
Posts: 3393
Joined: 15 May 2005, 04:26

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by LordMatt »

I don't think that's really true. That would suggest that modding any game and uploading your content is copyright infringement and Cavedog went out of its way to help modders, who weren't doing something very different from spring's modders.
[Krogoth86]
Posts: 1176
Joined: 23 Aug 2007, 19:46

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by [Krogoth86] »

I think KDR meant that we actually upload Cavedog stuff with our TA mods and not just what we've done ourselves while for mods in general you just upload what you want to add to the original source excluding what came with the game you mod...
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Hoi »

what about asking the company that owns ta making it abandonware/ selling or giving us the licence?
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Felix the Cat »

Hoi wrote:what about asking the company that owns ta making it abandonware/ selling or giving us the licence?
Whee, this again.

Technically I think it would stand up in court as abandoned IP, as Atari claimed not to own the TA IP in a communication with one of our community members. In any case, if Atari isn't aware that they own the IP, they probably aren't too concerned with enforcing their rights :P

Supposedly the TA IP was optioned to some Korean company, though.
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Das Bruce »

Hoi wrote:what about asking the company that owns ta making it abandonware/ selling or giving us the licence?
MTR

You spin me right round baby, right round, like a record baby, right round...
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by KDR_11k »

LordMatt wrote:I don't think that's really true. That would suggest that modding any game and uploading your content is copyright infringement and Cavedog went out of its way to help modders, who weren't doing something very different from spring's modders.
It is by default, some games have EULAs that permit modding, others include the license permitting mods into the SDK or something.
tombom
Posts: 1933
Joined: 18 Dec 2005, 20:21

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by tombom »

I'd question whether certain other mods legality for general use is any better, actually.
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Re: Inapropriate wiki edit.

Post by Neddie »

neddiedrow wrote:The funniest thing is that everything else has a legal status as well.
tombom wrote:I'd question whether certain other mods legality for general use is any better, actually.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”