CA X BA discussion
Moderator: Moderators
Re: CA X BA discussion
vache have u played CA in the last 500 revisions
seems like you havent
seems like you havent
Re: CA X BA discussion
I don't have time to respond to all of your points right now, but I will respond to one of them.
I find this to be one of the biggest problems in BA and CA team games. By far, the most common form of this is farming adv solars and metal makers. metal makers are a lot worse in CA. So it makes the problem even worse. I advocate just removing metal makers from the game entirely. They are only ever useful to eat your excess energy, which I think lessens the strategic element of managing your e economy. Mostly they just serve to bait newbs into making a metal maker economy, ruining the game.LBF_Vachequirit wrote:In 1V1 this is not a problem since 1V1's rarely reach T2. In team game it's a really big problem, since you'll always have someone trying to reach and use T2 , and making the game immediately slow and unfun.
Re: CA X BA discussion
Btw "balanced" appears to be highly subjective.
How do you define "balanced". We define it as making all units viable/usefull with lots of options and possible tactics. Of course in this respect its not perfect in CA but imo its way better than in BA.
How do you define "balanced". We define it as making all units viable/usefull with lots of options and possible tactics. Of course in this respect its not perfect in CA but imo its way better than in BA.
Re: CA X BA discussion
:|Licho wrote:Btw "balanced" appears to be highly subjective.
Re: CA X BA discussion
"Complete also seems to be highly subjective
- Machiosabre
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56
Re: CA X BA discussion
If someone says "subjective" is highly subjective I'm going to punch them in the face.
Re: CA X BA discussion
complete annhilation can mean total destruction :] and it does
balance just means balanced which is subjective ;p
balance just means balanced which is subjective ;p
Re: CA X BA discussion
Complete is not subjective, it means that there is nothing left to be done in that matter. So "Complete Annihilation" means annihilating stuff till there is nothing else to annihilate :)
Re: CA X BA discussion
Everything is subjective in this sphere of thought. Not a useful criticism.
Re: CA X BA discussion
Yes :)Crayfish wrote:I am subjective? :/
You might be fruit of my madness, or I might be not mad and in that case you in fact exist,
Re: CA X BA discussion
I advocate maintaining the ratio of current metal makers, but folding two into one. They are useful supplementary economic structures, particularly in team games, though generally they do serve as a newb trap. We need to emphasize that they are only supplementary.
Re: CA X BA discussion
Maybe add a loading screen with that fact? :)
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: 12 Oct 2007, 09:24
Re: CA X BA discussion
The loadscreen needs this fact: 500m for an adv solar, runs 2 mms. thats 1 metal per second(I think). 500 seconds or 8 minutes 20 seconds to get back how much you spent on the energy to run it. This isn't taking into account the E cost of the adv solar or the mm.
Re: CA X BA discussion
ROFL*10!BlueTemplar wrote:More like
NOTA, End of the Universe, XTA, Paint Drying, TiA/SA, BA, CA
Seriously, if the last game on coast to coast hadn't crashed we would still be playing it!
(Was pretty amazing though... And maybe our Krogoth army would have managed to cross the sea, who knows?)

(from page 4)
Re: CA X BA discussion
Whats wrong with a bit of metal makers spam?just makes the game less slippery slope.