legal"spring_0.76b1.exe"licence VS cavedog(tm)&futurGAMEz? - Page 5

legal"spring_0.76b1.exe"licence VS cavedog(tm)&futurGAMEz?

Discuss the source code and development of Spring Engine in general from a technical point of view. Patches go here too.

Moderator: Moderators

accept this ?(multi answer allowed)

at school someone copy your answers and you are kicked:0/20
5
9%
one use your name/picture/work for any you dislike/dontknow
4
7%
the devil disguis in you and getout after lot of bad
9
16%
one copy you and gain milliards$ and not remind you
4
7%
benladen talk about you at CNN or MTV at 20h00
9
16%
the new comic crapy"the ugly"is your clone
8
15%
the ben laden son want marry you
16
29%
 
Total votes: 55

User avatar
Pxtl
Posts: 6112
Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 01:43

Re: legal"spring_0.76b1.exe"licence VS cavedog(tm)&futurGAMEz?

Post by Pxtl »

MY TEXT IS BIGGER THAN YOURS SO IT'S MORE IMPORTANT
Radtoo
Posts: 50
Joined: 12 May 2006, 14:21

Re: legal"spring_0.76b1.exe"licence VS cavedog(tm)&futurGAMEz?

Post by Radtoo »

Is someone trying out a random word generator here? :)

I also still encourage the OTA content to leave the battlefield, and more redistributably or open source - licenced content to enter it, but I figure the threat level is marginal, and the damage done to Atari nonexistant.

If anything some people will find an old copy of TA now, just to satisfy their collector / fan instincts. :wink:
Post Reply

Return to “Engine”