make this mod plzLordMatt wrote:GTFO
Balanced Annihilation V6.0
Moderator: Moderators
- KingRaptor
- Zero-K Developer
- Posts: 838
- Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 03:44
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
This whole ba thing resembles EE's history of development.
goes liek this:awsome,awsome,awsome,awsome,awsome,Bunch of idiots started infulancing the developer,telling him how the game should be played and what it shouldnt be,fail,fail,fail,mod died.
goes liek this:awsome,awsome,awsome,awsome,awsome,Bunch of idiots started infulancing the developer,telling him how the game should be played and what it shouldnt be,fail,fail,fail,mod died.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
If you'd really mean these words you would keep your cool ideas to yourself ~~,Bunch of idiots started infulancing the developer,telling him how the game should be played and what it shouldnt be,fail,fail,fail,mod died.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
lol.
Sleksa you know what idea of yours I liked?To make the t2 kbot lab cheaper.That WAS a good idea..I kinda agree with you on that.
Sleksa you know what idea of yours I liked?To make the t2 kbot lab cheaper.That WAS a good idea..I kinda agree with you on that.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
in that case, while you are halving t2 kbot lab cost, half the t3 lab cost, and make t3 accessible in mid to early game, for moar epic battlez. Then make t4 which is like epic krogs that shoot krogs and peewees that have vulcans mounted on their arms. And epic nukes that destroy everything on the map except your pewees.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
roaches shud have 100 percent immunity to nukes
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
all t3 shud have 100 percent immunity to dgun
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
WTF you talking about Willis..Gota wrote:This whole ba thing resembles EE's history of development.
goes liek this:awsome,awsome,awsome,awsome,awsome,Bunch of idiots started infulancing the developer,telling him how the game should be played and what it shouldnt be,fail,fail,fail,mod died.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
I was talking about making the TECH 2 VEHICLE CONSTRUCTOR able to make the EXPERIMENTAL GANTRY
The best way to break a stalemate is by having something bigger than what is causing the stalemate, so why not krogoth swarms? NOTHING can beat a krogoth swarm except for a ultra-big swarm of tech 2/3 units...
The best way to break a stalemate is by having something bigger than what is causing the stalemate, so why not krogoth swarms? NOTHING can beat a krogoth swarm except for a ultra-big swarm of tech 2/3 units...
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
if the game has gone on long enuff for sum1 to build a krog = failmanored wrote:I was talking about making the TECH 2 VEHICLE CONSTRUCTOR able to make the EXPERIMENTAL GANTRY
The best way to break a stalemate is by having something bigger than what is causing the stalemate, so why not krogoth swarms? NOTHING can beat a krogoth swarm except for a ultra-big swarm of tech 2/3 units...
if u can build more than 1 krog = epic phail stop playing dsd..
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
I guess T3 is included because it's not meant to be used.
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 09 Apr 2005, 11:40
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
Thought EE went awesome awesome awesome, bunch of whiners cluttered up the thread, EE development went private to avoid whiners, EE returned in a state of awesome.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
You should be able to make the cheaper T3 units within a reasonably long game, though. Maybe a single krog at the end, when you've pretty well already won, to punch through with your army of T1 and T2. But a krog swarm == wtfporc.Otherside wrote:if the game has gone on long enuff for sum1 to build a krog = fail
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.0
Why do you all object building t3 units?
They ar fine!nothing wrong with building t3.
CAuse t3 is so hard to get now just causes BB spams and nuke whoring.
t3 ATM are not good at all.
ATM team games usually resort to either nuke/antinuke wars bombing runs and BB spam.All of those are less fun than playing with t3.T3 units need to get a buff.A krog should be a GG if built unless d gunned by a commander..ATm it just gets owned by BB spams and Nuke bomber spams..
By the way the other day i saw about 15 archangels not being able to stop about 20 advanced bombers flying right above them..
BB should cost much more anyway..Atm its either BB spam or advanced bomber spam..its just boring and makes big team games not fun.
They ar fine!nothing wrong with building t3.
CAuse t3 is so hard to get now just causes BB spams and nuke whoring.
t3 ATM are not good at all.
ATM team games usually resort to either nuke/antinuke wars bombing runs and BB spam.All of those are less fun than playing with t3.T3 units need to get a buff.A krog should be a GG if built unless d gunned by a commander..ATm it just gets owned by BB spams and Nuke bomber spams..
By the way the other day i saw about 15 archangels not being able to stop about 20 advanced bombers flying right above them..
BB should cost much more anyway..Atm its either BB spam or advanced bomber spam..its just boring and makes big team games not fun.