Libregamewiki - New Wiki for open source games

Libregamewiki - New Wiki for open source games

Various things about Spring that do not fit in any of the other forums listed below, including forum rules.

Moderator: Moderators

el_matarife
Posts: 933
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 02:04

Libregamewiki - New Wiki for open source games

Post by el_matarife »

http://libregamewiki.org/Main_Page

I just saw this on Digg. I'm posting it because clearly, Spring needs some entries on here, but there's a catch. The wiki is separated into different categories for engines and games. Should Spring be entered as SpringRTS in the engines section, then all the Spring mods have separate articles in the games category? Or should we just put one big entry under games with all the mods listed?
User avatar
BrainDamage
Lobby Developer
Posts: 1164
Joined: 25 Sep 2006, 13:56

Post by BrainDamage »

spring is moving to a a more "engine" role, so my opinion is to list spring as engine and mods as games who uses the spring engine

mods can be added only when they match the license requierements, so only a very small portion of the mods can get in there (no TA-based mods for example)
tombom
Posts: 1933
Joined: 18 Dec 2005, 20:21

Post by tombom »

I think the only one that would fit the license bit is NanoBlobs.
imbaczek
Posts: 3629
Joined: 22 Aug 2006, 16:19

Post by imbaczek »

I'd add something about Kernel Panic anyway 8)
el_matarife
Posts: 933
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 02:04

Post by el_matarife »

I was assuming that NanoBlobs or Kernel Panic would work. Are any of the other mods 100% OTA content free and GPL now? Is anyone working to GPL their mods?
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

I'll see about working up other material for alternative (CC/public domain) licensed titles.
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

el_matarife wrote:I was assuming that NanoBlobs or Kernel Panic would work. Are any of the other mods 100% OTA content free and GPL now? Is anyone working to GPL their mods?
Read the license requirements - GPL is not required - it is one of many accepted licenses.

S44 is (obviously) OTA content free and will be released under Creative Commons when it's done, which is a far superior license to GPL for content and mods.
manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Post by manored »

Cant EE go in there too?
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Post by SwiftSpear »

manored wrote:Cant EE go in there too?
EE, like gundam, is a private copyright.
User avatar
Quanto042
Basically OTA Developer
Posts: 778
Joined: 22 Feb 2006, 03:01

Post by Quanto042 »

They have an ENGINE listing, we can add spring in there as an all around project as well. :roll:
el_matarife
Posts: 933
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 02:04

Post by el_matarife »

Felix the Cat wrote: Read the license requirements - GPL is not required - it is one of many accepted licenses.

S44 is (obviously) OTA content free and will be released under Creative Commons when it's done, which is a far superior license to GPL for content and mods.
Yeah, but any Lua code or maybe even COB scripting in the mod would probably have to be under one of the free Sourcecode licenses they accept. The COB scripting is probably debatable and could probably go under a media license, but the Lua code definitely would need to be under one of these: http://libregamewiki.org/Free/libre_source_code_license

I don't suppose Smoth or Fang would feel like releasing the media to their mods under Creative Commons - Attribution Share Alike which seems to be close enough to their attitudes about their work.
Quanto042 wrote:They have an ENGINE listing, we can add spring in there as an all around project as well. :roll:
We mentioned that, but adding Spring without any playable content won't look so good.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

Why? The engine section looks to me like it's meant for developers looking for an engine for their game, not for gamers to download and play stuff on.
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

el_matarife wrote:
Felix the Cat wrote: Read the license requirements - GPL is not required - it is one of many accepted licenses.

S44 is (obviously) OTA content free and will be released under Creative Commons when it's done, which is a far superior license to GPL for content and mods.
Yeah, but any Lua code or maybe even COB scripting in the mod would probably have to be under one of the free Sourcecode licenses they accept. The COB scripting is probably debatable and could probably go under a media license, but the Lua code definitely would need to be under one of these: http://libregamewiki.org/Free/libre_source_code_license

I don't suppose Smoth or Fang would feel like releasing the media to their mods under Creative Commons - Attribution Share Alike which seems to be close enough to their attitudes about their work.
Quanto042 wrote:They have an ENGINE listing, we can add spring in there as an all around project as well. :roll:
We mentioned that, but adding Spring without any playable content won't look so good.
TBH I doubt they will check to see if our i's are dotted and t's are crossed, so long as the licensing is within the realm of open use software. With all the much-debated questions surrounding the implications of GPL'd scripting on mods, it wouldn't really be fair to ask modders to GPL their scripts just so we can be listed on some wiki that nobody's ever heard of anyways.
manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Post by manored »

SwiftSpear wrote:
manored wrote:Cant EE go in there too?
EE, like gundam, is a private copyright.
Isnt EE fang's creation? I mean, why would he want people to not advertise his game for free? :)
User avatar
TheBigPK
Posts: 235
Joined: 22 Jun 2007, 09:24

Post by TheBigPK »

i believe its based off earth 2150
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

TheBigPK wrote:i believe its based off earth 2150
In the sense that Supreme Commander is based off Total Annihilation...
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Post by SwiftSpear »

manored wrote:
SwiftSpear wrote:
manored wrote:Cant EE go in there too?
EE, like gundam, is a private copyright.
Isnt EE fang's creation? I mean, why would he want people to not advertise his game for free? :)
It's not open sourced. That's what I'm saying. If they allow people to post closed sourced games then fine, someone feel free to add it.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

EE isn't tied to Earth but it's tied to Fang's willingness to release it under CC/GPL/whatever which I doubt exists.
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

If I recall, I might be wrong, Fang wanted to retain the rights to it so nobody could butcher it - which, given some of the mashup games released under the radar for Spring, makes perfect sense.
User avatar
Zoy64
Posts: 454
Joined: 12 Nov 2006, 00:30

Post by Zoy64 »

why cant we put OTA mods into the wiki? I mean, Total Annihiliation is virtually non-existent anymore. Since you cannot make a profit off of it anymore, then it sould be fine.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”