Libregamewiki - New Wiki for open source games
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 02:04
Libregamewiki - New Wiki for open source games
http://libregamewiki.org/Main_Page
I just saw this on Digg. I'm posting it because clearly, Spring needs some entries on here, but there's a catch. The wiki is separated into different categories for engines and games. Should Spring be entered as SpringRTS in the engines section, then all the Spring mods have separate articles in the games category? Or should we just put one big entry under games with all the mods listed?
I just saw this on Digg. I'm posting it because clearly, Spring needs some entries on here, but there's a catch. The wiki is separated into different categories for engines and games. Should Spring be entered as SpringRTS in the engines section, then all the Spring mods have separate articles in the games category? Or should we just put one big entry under games with all the mods listed?
- BrainDamage
- Lobby Developer
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: 25 Sep 2006, 13:56
spring is moving to a a more "engine" role, so my opinion is to list spring as engine and mods as games who uses the spring engine
mods can be added only when they match the license requierements, so only a very small portion of the mods can get in there (no TA-based mods for example)
mods can be added only when they match the license requierements, so only a very small portion of the mods can get in there (no TA-based mods for example)
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 02:04
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
Read the license requirements - GPL is not required - it is one of many accepted licenses.el_matarife wrote:I was assuming that NanoBlobs or Kernel Panic would work. Are any of the other mods 100% OTA content free and GPL now? Is anyone working to GPL their mods?
S44 is (obviously) OTA content free and will be released under Creative Commons when it's done, which is a far superior license to GPL for content and mods.
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 02:04
Yeah, but any Lua code or maybe even COB scripting in the mod would probably have to be under one of the free Sourcecode licenses they accept. The COB scripting is probably debatable and could probably go under a media license, but the Lua code definitely would need to be under one of these: http://libregamewiki.org/Free/libre_source_code_licenseFelix the Cat wrote: Read the license requirements - GPL is not required - it is one of many accepted licenses.
S44 is (obviously) OTA content free and will be released under Creative Commons when it's done, which is a far superior license to GPL for content and mods.
I don't suppose Smoth or Fang would feel like releasing the media to their mods under Creative Commons - Attribution Share Alike which seems to be close enough to their attitudes about their work.
We mentioned that, but adding Spring without any playable content won't look so good.Quanto042 wrote:They have an ENGINE listing, we can add spring in there as an all around project as well.
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
TBH I doubt they will check to see if our i's are dotted and t's are crossed, so long as the licensing is within the realm of open use software. With all the much-debated questions surrounding the implications of GPL'd scripting on mods, it wouldn't really be fair to ask modders to GPL their scripts just so we can be listed on some wiki that nobody's ever heard of anyways.el_matarife wrote:Yeah, but any Lua code or maybe even COB scripting in the mod would probably have to be under one of the free Sourcecode licenses they accept. The COB scripting is probably debatable and could probably go under a media license, but the Lua code definitely would need to be under one of these: http://libregamewiki.org/Free/libre_source_code_licenseFelix the Cat wrote: Read the license requirements - GPL is not required - it is one of many accepted licenses.
S44 is (obviously) OTA content free and will be released under Creative Commons when it's done, which is a far superior license to GPL for content and mods.
I don't suppose Smoth or Fang would feel like releasing the media to their mods under Creative Commons - Attribution Share Alike which seems to be close enough to their attitudes about their work.
We mentioned that, but adding Spring without any playable content won't look so good.Quanto042 wrote:They have an ENGINE listing, we can add spring in there as an all around project as well.
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
It's not open sourced. That's what I'm saying. If they allow people to post closed sourced games then fine, someone feel free to add it.manored wrote:Isnt EE fang's creation? I mean, why would he want people to not advertise his game for free? :)SwiftSpear wrote:EE, like gundam, is a private copyright.manored wrote:Cant EE go in there too?