Spring: 1944 v0.01 Alpha - Page 14

Spring: 1944 v0.01 Alpha

All game release threads should be posted here

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

They're a bit too substancial and/or square. I know we want to save on polies, but as they are... thin them a little or round them, otherwise they will always look like crosses.
Warlord Zsinj
Imperial Winter Developer
Posts: 3742
Joined: 24 Aug 2004, 08:59

Post by Warlord Zsinj »

I'd have to agree on the tents; as well as the guard tower. For the most part, I think it is worth going upwards with face counts on buildings to make them a little bit more believable. You aren't going to be seeing them in anywhere near the numbers you'll be seeing infantry (except for perhaps ammunition dumps), so there isn't a big concern there.

For the most part, I'd say you need to get hold of some French-style houses.

I think you should probably make atleast some of the buildings look pre-bombed out (much of that is in the texturing, but you still want to have nice chunks missing). Do we have texture degradation? You could use that so that houses start pristene, then get more bombed out as the battle goes on...


COH is relatively succesful with it's environments.
Image
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

we already have some good power lines from gnome
User avatar
Guessmyname
Posts: 3301
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 21:07

Post by Guessmyname »

Whilst we don't have texture degradation, we can have features become other features on death:

Ordinary house
Damaged house
More damaged house
Ruins
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

The reason I've kept features very low-poly is that, for some reason, features lag my computer like 10x the amount that units do. 10 100-poly tanks roll across the screen at a nice 50FPS or so. 10 100-poly features make me feel like I'm running Spring on a Commodore 64.

If this problem has been/will be imminently corrected, I'll increase poly counts on features.

...actually, I lied. I already have started to make more detailed stuff.

Image
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

...so much for low-poly.

Image

Premise of the damage is that the two outside "fuel tanks" exploded catastrophically. Now, what would be really cool is if they actually exploded when the factory is hit for x damage, and the factory model changes to this at the explosion.
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

Image

Okay, if this is company of heroes, then I immediately withdraw anything I said about competing with it.. That is the best I have seen some FPS's look.. My computer sucks so much..


And those are some fine buildings..
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Post by rattle »

You should improve the wreck model and fix it in some places as well. The plate the tanks stood on got clipping errors at least (unless they are intended). Also the (radar?) tower looks weird, shouldn't it be broken at least?
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

rattle wrote:You should improve the wreck model and fix it in some places as well. The plate the tanks stood on got clipping errors at least (unless they are intended). Also the (radar?) tower looks weird, shouldn't it be broken at least?
-No, no clipping errors, though it looks like it. It's just Wings being weird and making it look like errors. I had to triangulate the surface because of its complexity, which contributes to the look.

-I have no idea what that tower is, but on the original it looks like solid metal, so I decided to have it collapse downward through the ceiling.
User avatar
1v0ry_k1ng
Posts: 4656
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24

Post by 1v0ry_k1ng »

the CoH gameplay sucks, who cares about the the graphics. its simple and dumbed down and it just dosnt feel good. This mod has real potential, graphics shouldnt be so much of an issue. whens the first playable version planned for?
SpikedHelmet
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1948
Joined: 21 Sep 2004, 08:25

Post by SpikedHelmet »

Hmm.. I wonder how moddable COH is.. hehehehe
j5mello
Posts: 1189
Joined: 26 Aug 2005, 05:40

Post by j5mello »

its made by the guys who made Dawn of War which while a bit complicated was fairly moddable (though most mods stayed within 40 universe) so i would say CoH is fairly moddable as well though i have no idea if they even released an SDK of any sorts.
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

The engine used in COH could be used for quite a lot of interesting things, heheh..

My comp sux, thats why I was marvelling at graphics..
Yet again, I do like the gameplay of COH, almost too squad based however.. I don't own the whole game, I have a feeling it would be boring after a while on single player, multiplayer would be pretty good though.

Of course this mod has potential, so do many others. Graphics aren't everything, so you should stop thinking that someone who marvels at graphics for a few seconds is a dumbass who likes graphics more than gameplay. At least it isn't halo, halo 2, or halo 3... Okay, I cooled down..
Sorry for going off topic so much..

Sorry again.
Last edited by Snipawolf on 20 Oct 2006, 23:21, edited 2 times in total.
SpikedHelmet
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1948
Joined: 21 Sep 2004, 08:25

Post by SpikedHelmet »

Jesus, calm down.
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

Sheesh, my school has like 25+ WWII books \O/

I got The Battle of the Bulge, and, contrary to previous belief. The German forces used jet engines during the last years of the war..

They were developed and started being made in '44... So I guess this means you need some Jets for Axis later in game, huh?

So this means, jets are gunna cost a lot >.>

Yet again, a noob's opinion..
SpikedHelmet
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1948
Joined: 21 Sep 2004, 08:25

Post by SpikedHelmet »

... contrary to what previous belief? Jets have been in this mod for 4 years now...
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

This mod has been around for 4 years..? Cool..

As in, my previous belief :P
SpikedHelmet
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1948
Joined: 21 Sep 2004, 08:25

Post by SpikedHelmet »

Aha!

Just as I suspected, our problem with improper shading on models ingame is due to some fuck up occuring when importing UV co-ordinates from a model exported from Ultimate Unwrap.. how did I find out, you ask!? Well, I opened the un-UVmapped .S3O model and used the Lighting feature to see it with lighting -- and, of course, it shows up shaded as it should be. But as soon as I imported the UV co-ordinates from the Ultimate Unwrap'd model, the shading became errored. Demonstration:

Image

Hopefully this problem can be fixed by exporting the UV co-ordinates of existing .S3O models, importing them into a "better" uv-mapping program and, and then exporting them out of that.
maestro
Posts: 352
Joined: 08 Jun 2005, 11:10

Post by maestro »

according to Zaphod aka jcnossen the shading problem is caused by upspring cant handle multiple UV point (i;e UV vertices shared by more than 1 UV 'island'). That is certainly not caused by your uv unwrap software.....
Even the most 3ds natural (the uberexpensive ubercomplex 3D MAX) wont solve the problem-- Ive tried it. Problem is in Spring/Upspring
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Post by Das Bruce »

SpikedHelmet wrote:Blah blah blah heil comrade stalin blah blah
Basically it breaks the shading wherever there's a break in the UV map, so you have to chop it up into pieces that are least likely to show it up, or deal with fugly shading.
Post Reply

Return to “Game Releases”