What resolution do you play Spring at?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Posts: 501
- Joined: 18 May 2006, 21:19
Not tota;ly correct.. most modern TFT's upsample the image in much the same way photoshop will scale up an image, and so doom (which will only run at 1600 x 1200 due top being craply writen) will look great on my 1920 x 1200Zenka wrote: On TFT's the higest resolution is also the amount of crystal cells it holds. You *must* use it's native resolution or have some pixels be rendered with 2 cells and some with 1, resolving in an unequliaised view.
aGorm
Well, indeed it doesn't look crappy. FortunatlyaGorm wrote:Not tota;ly correct.. most modern TFT's upsample the image in much the same way photoshop will scale up an image, and so doom (which will only run at 1600 x 1200 due top being craply writen) will look great on my 1920 x 1200
aGorm

It is just an attempt of an explanation why most people run 1280*1024 insetad of 1280*960.
And TFT is indeed the only thing in the galaxy that uses that weird aspect ratio. Therefore it is important.
Its an artefact from the 80s, when having 2^10 lines made it much easier to deal with.Caydr wrote:Yeah, this is for ingame resolution, not just desktop resolution.
This is unfortunate. It seems the majority is split between 1024x768 and 1280x1024, which use different aspect ratios, messing everything up.
I'm still trying to figure out why 1280x1024 became the standard rather than 1280x960. The 64 extra pixels are nice, but why? :S 1280x1024 is a weird bastardization that just appeared out of nowhere for no apparent reason. It's... I think 5:4, while the standard is 4:3.
And of COURSE people with 17" or 19" should use a 5:4 aspect ratio ingame, as thats what their monitors physically have. Using a 4:3 resolution would provide quite a bit of distortion.
IMHO, this shouldnt really be a problem. Spring will (hopefully, if i read the SVN log right) include support for non 4:3 aspect ratio in the next version. I mean, if TA could do it in 1997, there is no reason why a game today should squish the content just because the user runs as 16:10 or 5:4.
Thats damn good, i've had a lot of bad luck with monitors. The one I have now has lasted the longest (3) years.Ishach wrote:1280x960 on a 14 year old monitor
Other than that, most of my monitors only last for about 9mos - 18mos, then they crap out. I was pissed too, cause i had a really nice 19" CRT from NEC, and i figured it would last me for a lifetime (or at least my computer's lifetime). But the joke was one me as it only lasted 11months. Fuck u NEC, Fuck U.
Degaussing doesn't do a heck of a lot. It's intended to help eliminate color distortion caused by things like magnets, etc. Yeah, don't get an unshielded magnet near your CRT, btw...
To do a proper degaussing, you need a degaussing coil. It's basically a giant electromagnetic coil that you plug into the wall and move around your monitor for a couple of seconds. I don't think you can buy them.
To do a proper degaussing, you need a degaussing coil. It's basically a giant electromagnetic coil that you plug into the wall and move around your monitor for a couple of seconds. I don't think you can buy them.
New or used? If it's new they are guaranteed to work for some period of time, probably at least a year but I'd guess 2-3. NEC is the king of monitors, from what I understand.But the joke was one me as it only lasted 11months.
-
- Posts: 501
- Joined: 18 May 2006, 21:19