discriminatingly banned by decimator
Moderator: Moderators
The only example of this I can think of is that air first starts, such as on c2c are not viable in AA because the com can build defenders. Otherwise it seems to me that AA made more units useful and added new possible strategies.Forboding Angel wrote:AA did away with many of the core concepts though.LordMatt wrote:+1 Said it better than I could.Egarwaen wrote: Why not? Core Contingency improved on OTA. So did most of the balance patches. So does, in fact, Spring itself. What you say could only be true if OTA couldn't be improved without losing its core concepts.
Seriously. Play a game of OTA, then play a game of AA
Go back play a game of OTA, then play BOTA.
Now tell me which one felt the most like OTA. I've got 20$ riding on bota.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
nobody2u wrote:Advertising is well debated around here. Most people just don't like it.
Reminds me of a thread on the Glest forums (another OS RTS) That thread had almost a hundred screenshots of SpringSome people might have joined Spring because of that too
With the rate you guys seem to scare off people and the rate I see new patches and other goodies come out, I'd say you guys would really benefit from bringing in new blood.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
