4K!?! Are you serious!?!

esteroth12 · Post by **esteroth12** » 17 Sep 2006, 18:04

OK... why are the avatars limited to such abysmally low sizes? even AIM allows larger avs! can we please have 10, 15K avatars? its not like everyone has a 100K sig to slow you down, and almost everyone these days has DSL/Cable, if you don't, well... do we have to cater to the few without? 150K isn't that much data anyway, even for Dial-up...

Acidd_UK · Post by **Acidd_UK** » 17 Sep 2006, 18:11

Maybe we don't all want to be spammed with animated gif avatars? I think 4k is fine... I like the forums loading nice and quickly. Plus, who pays for foum bandwidth? I imagine could soon add up to a lot of b/w...

esteroth12 · Post by **esteroth12** » 17 Sep 2006, 18:15

then could we have the ability to refer our avatar to another url? when you upload from url, the forums saves it as an image... why doesn't it just use the url's bandwidth? plenty of free hosts out there who could pay for the bandwidth

also, the size didn't stop Kixxe/Andreask...

aGorm · Post by **aGorm** » 17 Sep 2006, 18:54

4 is quite enough...

aGorm

Snipawolf · Post by **Snipawolf** » 17 Sep 2006, 19:16

Yeah, megabytes.. lol

BlackLiger · Post by **BlackLiger** » 17 Sep 2006, 21:05

I'd prefer 10k, it'd cost me less of the quality of some images I want to use instead of this older commander.

KDR_11k · Post by **KDR_11k** » 17 Sep 2006, 21:37

I've had a lot of trouble making this image small enough to work as an avatar. Even if it was just 8k we could use the full color range of a JPG or GIF. If you don't like animated gifs just disable them in your browser, that's what I did.

Zenka · Post by **Zenka** » 17 Sep 2006, 21:55

I would like a little more image size as well (8 or 10k will do). Why are animated GIF's a big no-no? Everyone admired aGorm's Spring eating smily ^.^

Erom · Post by **Erom** » 17 Sep 2006, 22:23

The current size is more than plenty. The avatar is not meant to showcase your works of art, it's just an identifying mark.

LOrDo · Post by **LOrDo** » 19 Sep 2006, 01:58

Bigger the better, but I don't really care, 15 kilobytes isnt all that much.

Caydr · Post by **Caydr** » 19 Sep 2006, 02:22

Yes it is. Imagine 15 people posting on a page, each with their own 15 kb avatar. 225 kilobytes!

I'd like to see the maximum dimensions increased to 100x100 though maybe, and 5 kb.

Neddie · Post by **Neddie** » 19 Sep 2006, 04:48

Erom wrote:The current size is more than plenty. The avatar is not meant to showcase your works of art, it's just an identifying mark.

That's rather insulting, considering I did avatar art for over a year, sir.

aGorm · Post by **aGorm** » 19 Sep 2006, 15:04

5 kb would admitadly make all mine that bit better, but you can still do loads with 4kb! Or I can any way...

aGorm

Snipawolf · Post by **Snipawolf** » 19 Sep 2006, 22:40

Speaking of avatars, thats a pretty good one aGorm

aGorm · Post by **aGorm** » 19 Sep 2006, 23:15

Thanks... Jsut trying to prove a point

aGorm

Kixxe · Post by **Kixxe** » 19 Sep 2006, 23:25

MY AVATAR IS A DIRECT PROTEST AND TO SHOW YOU JUST HOW ANNOYING I CAN BE WITHIN THE RULESET OF YOUR PUNY SISSY RULES.

aGorm · Post by **aGorm** » 19 Sep 2006, 23:27

Much prefered your old one kixxe...

aGorm

Orakio · Post by **Orakio** » 19 Sep 2006, 23:44

hahaha I thought you were talking about commander metal.

Weaver · Post by **Weaver** » 20 Sep 2006, 00:26

Look this ones nice and under 4k.

NOiZE · Post by **NOiZE** » 20 Sep 2006, 10:40

Kixxe wrote:MY AVATAR IS A DIRECT PROTEST AND TO SHOW YOU JUST HOW ANNOYING I CAN BE WITHIN THE RULESET OF YOUR PUNY SISSY RULES.

fail

Spring RTS Engine

4K!?! Are you serious!?!

Avater Size

4K!?! Are you serious!?!