Conservapedia: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

FLOZi · Post by **FLOZi** » 09 Oct 2009, 14:16

http://conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project

lurker · Post by **lurker** » 09 Oct 2009, 14:20

Are you trying to imply that conservapedia isn't run by random crazy people? What do countries have to do with anything?

FLOZi · Post by **FLOZi** » 09 Oct 2009, 14:33

lurker wrote:Are you trying to imply that conservapedia isn't run by random crazy people? What do countries have to do with anything?

It's run by conservatives. The (US) is just to indicate I am not talking about the British Conservative party, given my location. Note the big stars-and-stripes in its logo.

lurker · Post by **lurker** » 09 Oct 2009, 15:05

Yes, but it makes it sounds like you're talking about 'US Conservatives' as a group.

FLOZi · Post by **FLOZi** » 09 Oct 2009, 15:46

better?

Forboding Angel · Post by **Forboding Angel** » 10 Oct 2009, 22:01

FLOZi wrote:
lurker wrote:Are you trying to imply that conservapedia isn't run by random crazy people? What do countries have to do with anything?
It's run by conservatives. The (US) is just to indicate I am not talking about the British Conservative party, given my location. Note the big stars-and-stripes in its logo.

No, it is apparently run by some hardcore nutjobs, hiding under the conservative banner.

JohannesH · Post by **JohannesH** » 10 Oct 2009, 22:09

Not really related to the bible stuff; but what are US conservatives trying to conserve, and US liberals trying to liberate?

Relative · Post by **Relative** » 10 Oct 2009, 22:13

JohannesH wrote:Not really related to the bible stuff; but what are US conservatives trying to conserve, and US liberals trying to liberate?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_o ... ted_States

tombom · Post by **tombom** » 10 Oct 2009, 22:33

Forboding Angel wrote:No, it is apparently run by some hardcore nutjobs, hiding under the conservative banner.

Not denying they're nutjobs, but they're not really "hiding under a conservative banner". The founder of Conservapedia and the leader of this project is a son of Phyllis Schlafly, who is a reasonably highly regarded conservative figure. Maybe you should start using more specific terms to differentiate yourself.

Peet · Post by **Peet** » 10 Oct 2009, 23:11

Forboding Angel wrote:hardcore nutjobs, hiding under the conservative banner.

True by definition?

Forboding Angel · Post by **Forboding Angel** » 11 Oct 2009, 05:31

Peet wrote:
Forboding Angel wrote:hardcore nutjobs, hiding under the conservative banner.
True by definition?

Hardly.

Also, never once have I heard the name "Phyllis Schlafly". Highly regarded by whom?

bobthedinosaur · Post by **bobthedinosaur** » 11 Oct 2009, 06:01

Spring RTS Engine

Conservapedia: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Conservapedia: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Re: (US) Conservatives: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Re: (US) Conservatives: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Re: (US) Conservatives: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Re: Conservapedia: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Re: (US) Conservatives: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Re: Conservapedia: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Re: Conservapedia: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Re: (US) Conservatives: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Re: (US) Conservatives: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Re: (US) Conservatives: 'Bible is too liberally bias'

Re: Conservapedia: 'Bible is too liberally bias'