Keeping the AI Wiki up to date

[submarine]

I dont know how many ppl actually have a look at the wiki but i thought it's a good idea to keep the AI section more up to date. I therefore moved QAI, TSI and CSAI to the "stable" category since I think they are not beeing developed anymore. However i'm not sure if they are stable, I just didnt want to brand them as unstable.

I also added KAIK to the list of AIs which are under active development and added, that AIs are sorted alphabetically (to prevent any speculations which AI is best/better than others...)

However i dont know much about KAIK, it would be nice if someone whose more familiar with it (maybe kloot?) could fill in the (big) gaps

Greetings, Alex

[imbaczek]

I dont know how many ppl actually have a look at the wiki but i thought it's a good idea to keep the AI section more up to date. I therefore moved QAI, TSI and CSAI to the "stable" category since I think they are not beeing developed anymore. However i'm not sure if they are stable, I just didnt want to brand them as unstable.

Ouch. Calling them "stable" is worse than calling debian stable "stable" - obsolete comes to mind, and in case of some AIs, quite possibly downright broken. (Obsolete as in won't work in svn spring, which will be released Really Soon Now.)

[submarine]

agreed you are right. for the next spring version any ai will have to be recompiled, right?

i guess "obsolete" will be a better description then

[imbaczek]

agreed you are right. for the next spring version any ai will have to be recompiled, right?

yes, as usual.

[submarine]

ok, following imbaczek's advice I merged the lists of stable/unstable AIs listing them now as "no longer in development" and added a remark, that those ais will not work with the current spring version

it would still be nice if someone could add a wiki page for KAIK, so every available AI has its own page in the wiki

[Kloot]

Yes, I should really create a wiki account one of these days.