Countries which have not adopted the metric system
Moderator: Moderators
Countries which have not adopted the metric system
Don't worry, USA citizens! It turns out, you're not alone!
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... system.png
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... system.png
I like it how it is in hte uk ^^
Technically were meant to be metric, but most people measure speed and distance in imperial ( i cant stand km). small distances i tend to use meters (asin a few cm or a couple of m, unless its someones height, then its ft)
metric all the way with weights and measures, unless you're ina pub, thens its pints.
Technically were meant to be metric, but most people measure speed and distance in imperial ( i cant stand km). small distances i tend to use meters (asin a few cm or a couple of m, unless its someones height, then its ft)
metric all the way with weights and measures, unless you're ina pub, thens its pints.
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
They're just systems of measurement.
There's no reason to prefer one over the other.
Systems of measurement are always artificial, and only make sense in terms of themselves.
In our current understanding of the universe, the only system of measurement that actually has external meaning would be based on the Planck length and the Planck time.
There's no reason to prefer one over the other.
Systems of measurement are always artificial, and only make sense in terms of themselves.
In our current understanding of the universe, the only system of measurement that actually has external meaning would be based on the Planck length and the Planck time.
- Michilus_nimbus
- Posts: 634
- Joined: 19 Nov 2004, 20:38
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
- KingRaptor
- Zero-K Developer
- Posts: 838
- Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 03:44
It's harder for someone unfamiliar with Imperial to work with it than for someone unfamiliar with Metric to work with it.Felix the Cat wrote:It's not easier to work with if you are unfamiliar with it.Michilus_nimbus wrote:Yes there is. The metric system is just plain easier to work with. That's a fact.Felix the Cat wrote:There's no reason to prefer one over the other.
Who wants to memorize completely arbitrary numbers?
everybody on earth...?KingRaptor wrote:
Who wants to memorize completely arbitrary numbers?
a meter is an arbitrary distance just like a foot or an inch.
felix said it best
although there is a reason to prefer one over the other...Felix the Cat wrote:They're just systems of measurement.
There's no reason to prefer one over the other.
Systems of measurement are always artificial, and only make sense in terms of themselves.
In our current understanding of the universe, the only system of measurement that actually has external meaning would be based on the Planck length and the Planck time.
the difference is that the metric system's units is all based on powers of 10, whereas there are 12 inches in a foot, 5280 feet in a mile, 6080 feet in a nautical mile, 16 ounces in a pound, 128 ounces in a US gallon, etc etc etc.
so why do we use the old retarded system here?
well, for one when you are used to describing distances in certain units and everyone else is familiar with those same units it is hard/useless to use metrics. also, when converting to the metric system would cost billions upon billions of dollars its an incentive not to do it. it sucks really hard having to buy two different sets of sockets for your wrench though, just as it sucks to do physics calculations with them.
i am glad that at least we all agreed on some arbitrary unit for time. too bad it's measured in stupid units, 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, 24 hours in a day, not to mention AM and PM retarded bullshit. day and year are the only units of time that really make sense.
Re: Countries which have not adopted the metric system
Haha. USA lives the stone age... or should i say middle-age?Caydr wrote:Don't worry, USA citizens! It turns out, you're not alone!
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... system.png
I hate all those: inchs, feets, pounds, miles, 12 hours clock, etc. all those just makes me SICK.
Time is just fine... if we changed the time to decimal units, like 100 seconds in minute, 100 minutes in a hour, etc. then we should also change the weeks and months. and months are based to moon, so it wont fit. And you gonna work for 8/10 days in a week? no... 5/7 is perfect.too bad it's measured in stupid units, 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, 24 hours in a day, not to mention AM and PM retarded bullshit. day and year are the only units of time that really make sense.
But I agree with AM and PM, they are for noobs.
- Tim Blokdijk
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 11:18
I learning all about "time" for work (I need to write a big planning tool) it's a REAL bitch (time) I mean time-zones, daylight saving time, software and hardware time, 2k38 problem, week of the year when weeks start at Sunday or Monday and a LOT of other gotcha's that make it all really complicated.
Re: Countries which have not adopted the metric system
The 12 hour clock is not so bad. 12 can be divided by 3 and 2. Convenient.TradeMark wrote: I hate all those: inchs, feets, pounds, miles, 12 hours clock, etc. all those just makes me SICK.
3x8 hour shifts instead of 3x6 hours, 66 minutes shifts.