Tired from seeing basic tactic errors?

Tired from seeing basic tactic errors?

Please use this forum to set up matches and discuss played games.

Moderator: Moderators

manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Tired from seeing basic tactic errors?

Post by manored »

I am (on BA)

So here are some of then, if you know others, disagree with one or have from some other mod post here. Maybe this will help people around a bit.

*Heavy tanks are good to crush defenses and light tanks for raiding or battling heavy tanks, NOT THE OPPOSITE! if you pay attention you will notice that light tanks cause more damage than heavy tanks (if you make as much light tanks as the heavy one costs) and they only not work against defenses cause those got high range and kill their low health before they can attack.

*Missile trucks work well as AA and maybe as skirmishers, but THEY ARENT MEANT TO BE ON THE FRONTLINE OR THE MAIN FORCE OF YOUR ARM! They got low health and firepower. you will just waste resources.

*Gunships work well against incoming arms, but THEY ARE NOT MEANT TO BE YOUR FRONTLINE DEFENSE! they will just be torn to pieces by a few AA units.

*If you start air on the frontline, you WILL BE CRUSHED! Never start air if there is no one or nothing to protect you. Even then you shouldnt start air since its builders are inneficient.

*This one is not quite a basic mistake, more like a tip: Once you got tech 2, trade ever 10 mm you have for a moho one. He eats the energy of 10 but generates metal like 12.

Will post more then I remember.
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

I thought you had become Tired, but no, metamorphosis is beyond us mortals.

Everything there seems to be in order except for the metal makers. You forget the initial cost of putting a moho up - I weigh each situation and decide independently.
User avatar
Zpock
Posts: 1218
Joined: 16 Sep 2004, 23:20

Post by Zpock »

Missile trucks are nice on the front lines now with their large sight range, as spotters.
manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Post by manored »

Zpock wrote:Missile trucks are nice on the front lines now with their large sight range, as spotters.
Well that use is fine, i was talking about people who use missile trucks instead of medium tanks and then put some more behind... :)

*Another one that is more like a tip: Make dt around your fixed defenses. That will defend em from some weapons and its pretty good so the enemy cant blast your Light lasers with rockos or missile trucks.
User avatar
SmuggoaT
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 May 2007, 09:53

Post by SmuggoaT »

The first rule for tactics is:

There are no rules.









8)
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Post by Neddie »

SmuggoaT wrote:The first rule for tactics is:

There are no rules.









8)
Don't I know you?
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

OOoooh, ban dodger!

Common mistake I see in Gundam: Yes, your base is hard to raid if you don't expand past your com's weapon range and yes, it's a MM based economy but while you're trying to porc up I'm plastering econ over half the map and massing up enough firepower that no com or defense line will stop me.

Oh and common n00b modder error: No, taking BA and throwing random units you get from UU in there to create two or three additional tech tiers does not make a good mod!
User avatar
drolito
Posts: 358
Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:44

Post by drolito »

another error :

* dont forget to defend your base against rush ...
User avatar
Ishach
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 May 2006, 06:44

Post by Ishach »

if you swarm a com with flashes and atlases you can kill it pretty good

if it dgguns it gets napped and if it dosent it dies to flashes
User avatar
Ishach
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 May 2006, 06:44

Post by Ishach »

ps im releasing my tactic under the GPL feel free to use it as logn as you credit me in chat
DemO
Posts: 541
Joined: 18 Jul 2006, 02:05

Post by DemO »

FPS comm ftw
User avatar
drolito
Posts: 358
Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:44

Post by drolito »

Ishach wrote:if you swarm a com with flashes and atlases you can kill it pretty good

if it dgguns it gets napped and if it dosent it dies to flashes
lol at this ... its good for an insulated com but a com need to be with 2 llt and 2 AA at least ... so your strategy can't work ...
User avatar
SmuggoaT
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 May 2007, 09:53

Post by SmuggoaT »

drolito wrote:
Ishach wrote:if you swarm a com with flashes and atlases you can kill it pretty good

if it dgguns it gets napped and if it dosent it dies to flashes
lol at this ... its good for an insulated com but a com need to be with 2 llt and 2 AA at least ... so your strategy can't work ...
I've seen it work alot of times, what i havn't seen is someone defend themselves from every possible attack at each time and still stay ahead in economy or attack.
User avatar
Dragon45
Posts: 2883
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 04:36

Post by Dragon45 »

The Smug Goat has decided to gift us all with its wisdom! *bows*
i can attest to the effectiveness of forcing a loner comm to either dgun or get napped. i had that work on me ONCE a long time ago. Hasn't happened to me since...
DemO
Posts: 541
Joined: 18 Jul 2006, 02:05

Post by DemO »

I've seen it work alot of times, what i havn't seen is someone defend themselves from every possible attack at each time and still stay ahead in economy or attack.
What do you mean by this? If you are Steven you know fine well that it is often the case on a map such as comet that you can take on and defend repeated agressive raids by an opponent whilst continuing to replace expansion for a short time and actually turn out to have a massive advantage in units over your opponent.

Following this, usually a massive co-ordinated counter attack where the player that has been countering raid after raid can do more damage to his unsuspecting foe than he has done with repeated small/medium size raids.

It's a common gameplay dynamic of 1v1's: player counter attacks straight after defending against a large number of enemy units, with a considerably larger force than the player who just lost 60% of his units attempting to do damage to enemy expansion/base.
User avatar
Ishach
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 May 2006, 06:44

Post by Ishach »

im pretty sure he means that if you defend against every possibility then you wont have enough resources to win
User avatar
SmuggoaT
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 May 2007, 09:53

Post by SmuggoaT »

That's becaue whilst the player attacking has used more resources on a attack whilst the other player has spent more on economy so has to defend, in most cases the attacker doesn't do enough damage for this to have been worth while so the defending players comes out in the end with the same amount of military strength but a better economy.

If the defending player could spend resources on economy because they new the exact kind of attack the other player would try to pull off (on comet a fast ground attack), the defending player could have easily spent resources defending against a full air attack and everything else the other player could have thought of insteead of putting resources into economy.
User avatar
Ishach
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 May 2006, 06:44

Post by Ishach »

if you defend against everything you defend against nothing~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
drolito
Posts: 358
Joined: 06 Feb 2007, 09:44

Post by drolito »

i dont play 1v1 ... i play team cause TA spring is a team game ... if i want to play alone i play starcraft or warcraft 3 ... so comet catcher 4v4 is not what u say !
DemO
Posts: 541
Joined: 18 Jul 2006, 02:05

Post by DemO »

Oh I see what you were saying now.

But about your response to my post: It's not all just about economy either. Often the defending player infact has far less economy than the attacking player (he's constantly getting raided and losing expansion whilst the attacking player expands relatively freely)

It's more that the attacking player will lose more units because his are attacking structures rather than units which lets the defending player simply attack his units without being shot at much. Obviously the attacking player will undoubtedly come across some static defences too, which adds to the tally.

More importantly perhaps, obviously the defending player will have a lot of corpses in his area of the map which for any reasonable player will be reclaimed and re-invested into units (effectively replacing dead units for free - then with a bonus of a little extra metal from opponents dead units).

Steven vs Lion Heart comet game I remember where steven basically didn't expand at all for the first 15 minutes of the game. Lion surrounds base and constantly raids any attempts at expansion. Steven holds flashes just outside veh lab. Lion has over +30 metal income and steven has +8.5 for majority of game... Steven has way way more units however, and wins the game with one single raid composing his entire force of flash.

Moral of story being more flash than opponent with less than 1/3rd of the metal income has something to say for itself. I've spectated countless games where the general trend is to counter attack shortly after defending from raids. Players do this for a reason.
Post Reply

Return to “Ingame Community”