btw, you do realise I agree with you? [that smurfing should be a warnable/bannable offence unless there is a compelling reason to allow it in individual cases]Gota wrote:Most people have tons of smurfs get over yourself.
Stop addressing me personally and think of the big picture you small minded fail.
Make rankings optional?
Moderator: Moderators
- Pressure Line
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: 21 May 2007, 02:09
Re: Make rankings optional?
- Sucky_Lord
- Posts: 531
- Joined: 22 Aug 2008, 16:29
Re: Make rankings optional?
Is this a joke post lol?Pressure Line wrote:I mean really... Why do people smurf? Whats there to gain? I am genuinely curious, maybe im missing out on something? There have been a few people posting who have mentioned what i would consider 'good' reasons to smurf (dev/mod anonymity for ex) but Id like to know why the people who smurf do it.

I have 2 smurf accounts btw people, but for a totally different reason to what u r all talking about. I purely wanted to make sure no1 would steal the names "Xenocide" and "Deth", incase i ever wanted/needed them =) Sad arent i?

(^^ Is that a "warnable/bannable offence"? I hardly think so.)
Re: Make rankings optional?
I dont smurf cause i dont want peopel to know who i am.
It would be rediculeous of me since there are about 2-3 Israelis playing spring and the other 2 always use their own accounts.
It would be rediculeous of me since there are about 2-3 Israelis playing spring and the other 2 always use their own accounts.
Re: Make rankings optional?
right, you only smurf because you're so strongly against it.
Re: Make rankings optional?
Exactly.aegis wrote:right, you only smurf because you're so strongly against it.
Re: Make rankings optional?
You fooled me the other day >_>Gota wrote:I dont smurf cause i dont want peopel to know who i am.
It would be rediculeous of me since there are about 2-3 Israelis playing spring and the other 2 always use their own accounts.
I was expecting a 2 stripe noob then suddenly 10 flash come and eat up my commander.
I forgot the basic rule: Israeli smurf == Basic
- Pressure Line
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: 21 May 2007, 02:09
Re: Make rankings optional?
Niiiiice, I lolled irl!BaNa wrote:I forgot the basic rule: Israeli smurf == Basic
Re: Make rankings optional?
1 addendum: not cool when mods smurf with mod privs then lie about who they are when they are abusive
Re: Make rankings optional?
it's actually seriously uncool when mods themselves are abused...
- [TS]Lollocide
- Posts: 324
- Joined: 30 Nov 2007, 18:24
Re: Make rankings optional?
Moderators are moderators, they're gunna either be sucked up to, ignored or hated on.aegis wrote:it's actually seriously uncool when mods themselves are abused...
Re: Make rankings optional?
Yep.
If you become a moderator don't whine about being harassed or badly treated.
If a moderator is upset by the way players treat him he can just stop moderating.
moderators should be treated with respect when they do their moderating but we all know that there will always be players who harass mods and also specific situations in which moderators make mistakes and will be treated worse cause they are moderators.
If you become a moderator don't whine about being harassed or badly treated.
If a moderator is upset by the way players treat him he can just stop moderating.
moderators should be treated with respect when they do their moderating but we all know that there will always be players who harass mods and also specific situations in which moderators make mistakes and will be treated worse cause they are moderators.
Re: Make rankings optional?
Heh, if I'd be a moderator and someone would harass me he'd get an instaban 

- Sucky_Lord
- Posts: 531
- Joined: 22 Aug 2008, 16:29
Re: Make rankings optional?
I like your thinkingHoi wrote:Heh, if I'd be a moderator and someone would harass me he'd get an instaban

Re: Make rankings optional?
It would be easy to ban all disposable e-mail services on that top 20 list (and any other that may be discovered).
Re: Make rankings optional?
make smurfing a bannable offense. +1.
Re: Make rankings optional?
no don't make it bannable.
Re: Make rankings optional?
Oh good lawd Jim, is dat sum wattamelon?
Re: Make rankings optional?
I think the problems linked to ranking such as smurf or poeple wanting to make ranking optionnal comes from the fact that the current ranking system is used to balance the game and that another ways should be found.
For exemple, one could all get a standard ranking at the creation on the account then:
- if you win you increase your rank
- if you win the game but that the average rank of your team is far better than the ennemi team one, you almost not increase your rank, you could even decrase if it is totally unbalanced.
- if you win the game but that the average rank of your team is far worst than the ennemi team one, you increase your rank a lot.
One could also add a coefficient for porcing efficiency and damage deal efficiency. For exemple
-Whatever you on or loose the game, If you manage to dealt only few damage with a large metal and energy production, your rank decrease
-Whatever you on or loose the game, If you manage to dealt a lot of damage with few metal and energy production, your rank increase. (encourage micromanaging)
-Whatever you on or loose the game, If you manage to have a big economy growing rate, your rank increase (this must be limited to a certain amount of point, becasue it will be absurde, spring is not simcity, however it is still important because even if you are quit skilled in micromanaging, you cannnot do anything against somone with an eco 10 times larger than yours)
etc,...
This looks like a bit as some ladder ranking systems.
For exemple, one could all get a standard ranking at the creation on the account then:
- if you win you increase your rank
- if you win the game but that the average rank of your team is far better than the ennemi team one, you almost not increase your rank, you could even decrase if it is totally unbalanced.
- if you win the game but that the average rank of your team is far worst than the ennemi team one, you increase your rank a lot.
One could also add a coefficient for porcing efficiency and damage deal efficiency. For exemple
-Whatever you on or loose the game, If you manage to dealt only few damage with a large metal and energy production, your rank decrease
-Whatever you on or loose the game, If you manage to dealt a lot of damage with few metal and energy production, your rank increase. (encourage micromanaging)
-Whatever you on or loose the game, If you manage to have a big economy growing rate, your rank increase (this must be limited to a certain amount of point, becasue it will be absurde, spring is not simcity, however it is still important because even if you are quit skilled in micromanaging, you cannnot do anything against somone with an eco 10 times larger than yours)
etc,...
This looks like a bit as some ladder ranking systems.
Re: Make rankings optional?
Please don't waste your time (and of others) by writing ideas and/or suggestions when you are a clueless newbie.albator wrote:bla
- adin_panther
- Posts: 164
- Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 14:14
Re: Make rankings optional?
I bet Regret would vote for a combomb/nap ranking option xD