Make rankings optional? - Page 4

Make rankings optional?

Please use this forum to set up matches and discuss played games.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Pressure Line
Posts: 2283
Joined: 21 May 2007, 02:09

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Pressure Line »

Gota wrote:Most people have tons of smurfs get over yourself.
Stop addressing me personally and think of the big picture you small minded fail.
btw, you do realise I agree with you? [that smurfing should be a warnable/bannable offence unless there is a compelling reason to allow it in individual cases]
User avatar
Sucky_Lord
Posts: 531
Joined: 22 Aug 2008, 16:29

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Sucky_Lord »

Pressure Line wrote:I mean really... Why do people smurf? Whats there to gain? I am genuinely curious, maybe im missing out on something? There have been a few people posting who have mentioned what i would consider 'good' reasons to smurf (dev/mod anonymity for ex) but Id like to know why the people who smurf do it.
Is this a joke post lol? :P People smurf so that when teams are auto-balanced, they are put with higher level players; Therefore, giving the team an advantage. Also, people want to start afresh, without people knowing who they are.(Is BaSiC a good example of this?) I hope i have cleared sum of ur curiosity.

I have 2 smurf accounts btw people, but for a totally different reason to what u r all talking about. I purely wanted to make sure no1 would steal the names "Xenocide" and "Deth", incase i ever wanted/needed them =) Sad arent i? ;)
(^^ Is that a "warnable/bannable offence"? I hardly think so.)
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Gota »

I dont smurf cause i dont want peopel to know who i am.
It would be rediculeous of me since there are about 2-3 Israelis playing spring and the other 2 always use their own accounts.
User avatar
aegis
Posts: 2456
Joined: 11 Jul 2007, 17:47

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by aegis »

right, you only smurf because you're so strongly against it.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Gota »

aegis wrote:right, you only smurf because you're so strongly against it.
Exactly.
BaNa
Posts: 1562
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 21:05

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by BaNa »

Gota wrote:I dont smurf cause i dont want peopel to know who i am.
It would be rediculeous of me since there are about 2-3 Israelis playing spring and the other 2 always use their own accounts.
You fooled me the other day >_>

I was expecting a 2 stripe noob then suddenly 10 flash come and eat up my commander.

I forgot the basic rule: Israeli smurf == Basic
User avatar
Pressure Line
Posts: 2283
Joined: 21 May 2007, 02:09

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Pressure Line »

BaNa wrote:I forgot the basic rule: Israeli smurf == Basic
Niiiiice, I lolled irl!
BaNa
Posts: 1562
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 21:05

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by BaNa »

1 addendum: not cool when mods smurf with mod privs then lie about who they are when they are abusive
User avatar
aegis
Posts: 2456
Joined: 11 Jul 2007, 17:47

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by aegis »

it's actually seriously uncool when mods themselves are abused...
User avatar
[TS]Lollocide
Posts: 324
Joined: 30 Nov 2007, 18:24

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by [TS]Lollocide »

aegis wrote:it's actually seriously uncool when mods themselves are abused...
Moderators are moderators, they're gunna either be sucked up to, ignored or hated on.
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Gota »

Yep.
If you become a moderator don't whine about being harassed or badly treated.
If a moderator is upset by the way players treat him he can just stop moderating.
moderators should be treated with respect when they do their moderating but we all know that there will always be players who harass mods and also specific situations in which moderators make mistakes and will be treated worse cause they are moderators.
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Hoi »

Heh, if I'd be a moderator and someone would harass me he'd get an instaban :P
User avatar
Sucky_Lord
Posts: 531
Joined: 22 Aug 2008, 16:29

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Sucky_Lord »

Hoi wrote:Heh, if I'd be a moderator and someone would harass me he'd get an instaban :P
I like your thinking :mrgreen:
Tobi
Spring Developer
Posts: 4598
Joined: 01 Jun 2005, 11:36

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Tobi »

It would be easy to ban all disposable e-mail services on that top 20 list (and any other that may be discovered).
User avatar
Gota
Posts: 7151
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Gota »

make smurfing a bannable offense. +1.
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Hoi »

no don't make it bannable.
EFG9001
Posts: 3
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 14:35

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by EFG9001 »

Oh good lawd Jim, is dat sum wattamelon?
User avatar
albator
Posts: 866
Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 14:20

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by albator »

I think the problems linked to ranking such as smurf or poeple wanting to make ranking optionnal comes from the fact that the current ranking system is used to balance the game and that another ways should be found.

For exemple, one could all get a standard ranking at the creation on the account then:
- if you win you increase your rank
- if you win the game but that the average rank of your team is far better than the ennemi team one, you almost not increase your rank, you could even decrase if it is totally unbalanced.
- if you win the game but that the average rank of your team is far worst than the ennemi team one, you increase your rank a lot.

One could also add a coefficient for porcing efficiency and damage deal efficiency. For exemple
-Whatever you on or loose the game, If you manage to dealt only few damage with a large metal and energy production, your rank decrease
-Whatever you on or loose the game, If you manage to dealt a lot of damage with few metal and energy production, your rank increase. (encourage micromanaging)
-Whatever you on or loose the game, If you manage to have a big economy growing rate, your rank increase (this must be limited to a certain amount of point, becasue it will be absurde, spring is not simcity, however it is still important because even if you are quit skilled in micromanaging, you cannnot do anything against somone with an eco 10 times larger than yours)

etc,...

This looks like a bit as some ladder ranking systems.
Regret
Posts: 2086
Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 19:04

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by Regret »

albator wrote:bla
Please don't waste your time (and of others) by writing ideas and/or suggestions when you are a clueless newbie.
User avatar
adin_panther
Posts: 164
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 14:14

Re: Make rankings optional?

Post by adin_panther »

I bet Regret would vote for a combomb/nap ranking option xD
Locked

Return to “Ingame Community”