Absolute Annihilation 2.11 - Page 119

Absolute Annihilation 2.11

All game release threads should be posted here

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Post by KDR_11k »

I think the BLoDs could use that "super awesome" look you want. Or use the Monkeylord. I haven't tested it but I think a beam laser set to "big laser" looks like the beamcannons in Freespace 2?
User avatar
REVENGE
Posts: 2382
Joined: 24 Aug 2006, 06:13

Post by REVENGE »

Another issue to address: Marauders are too fast and more importantly, they blow up ridiculously large for their size. I mean comon, those Marauders can just crowd around bigger L3 mechs and get blown up, acting like crawling bombs. If they blow up this big, at least make Karg and Razor's explosions more damaging. Also, they can outrun Pyros, which just doesn't seem right as these are supposed to be big heavy ass mechs.
KlavoHunter
Posts: 141
Joined: 28 May 2006, 21:41

Post by KlavoHunter »

Anyways, my post seconded (thirded?) the protests about the removal of the LRPC ships. There was absolutely no reason to remove them - it gave players in the water a way to strike back at players with LRPCs, without being unbalanced.

But land-based Bertha versus LRPC ship? The land-based one wins, I guarantee it. In my experience, the land-based guns seem to be unusually accurate at pegging large ships (Which include Battleships, Flagships, and, surprise, the LRPC ships!). Whereas shooting an enemy Bertha emplacement? The shots go all over unless you have LOS, basically.

And I haven't even brought up the fact that players on land can build Shield Generators to defend their base! Whereas players in the water have to just hunker down and take that punishment. (Granted, a lot of their important structures are underwater, but Bertha shots still damage those if the shell explodes above them.)





Also, I recall the initial changelog saying something about removing the "Requiter". What the hell was that? I've never heard of it.
Hellspawn
Posts: 392
Joined: 24 Feb 2006, 11:54

Post by Hellspawn »

Monkeylord would be fun to have xD. It would be one of those toys, you build when you want some special way of killing a camping nub ^^.
User avatar
Ishach
Posts: 1670
Joined: 02 May 2006, 06:44

Post by Ishach »

Make the Juggernaught into a VTOL
User avatar
REVENGE
Posts: 2382
Joined: 24 Aug 2006, 06:13

Post by REVENGE »

Also, I recall the initial changelog saying something about removing the "Requiter". What the hell was that? I've never heard of it.
Its a mobile tac nuke launcher for ARM, built by the gantry.
User avatar
Cabbage
Posts: 1548
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 22:34

Post by Cabbage »

Its the core tactical nuke, not the arm emp ^^

And whoever mentioned the maurader being too fast / explosion being too big was right, its funny until you're on hte receiveing end :P
User avatar
Drone_Fragger
Posts: 1341
Joined: 04 Dec 2005, 15:49

Post by Drone_Fragger »

Its MEANT to be fast. Its a fast assault mech. Although, yes, the explosion does need toning down a bit.
User avatar
Machiosabre
Posts: 1474
Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56

Post by Machiosabre »

The explosion makes it fun though, you can't ever have a lot of them close together but if you have one in someones base it's still an awesome bomb :twisted:
User avatar
Cabbage
Posts: 1548
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 22:34

Post by Cabbage »

not as fast as they currently are drone, its pretty much on par with an AK, and thats just silly.
User avatar
Drone_Fragger
Posts: 1341
Joined: 04 Dec 2005, 15:49

Post by Drone_Fragger »

Lies, Its fine.
User avatar
Cabbage
Posts: 1548
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 22:34

Post by Cabbage »

so you're saying its fine for an anphib, L3 attack mech, wich packs a big punch and has a deadly explosion to be just as fast as an AK?

:roll:
User avatar
knorke
Posts: 7971
Joined: 22 Feb 2006, 01:02

Post by knorke »

just make it really expensive!!111
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

I'm reducing its explosion size, but I'm happy with its speed. That's the way it was designed to be.
User avatar
Drone_Fragger
Posts: 1341
Joined: 04 Dec 2005, 15:49

Post by Drone_Fragger »

Yay.

Anyways, There are plenty of things faster than Aks.
Roseo
Posts: 2
Joined: 26 Aug 2006, 16:56

Post by Roseo »

Can you put a max range on the vipers in the next version? One viper shouldn't be able to shoot up an entire base halfway across a 16x16 map by FPSing it.

Granted, it does little damage, but it's still a pain in the ass losing all your T1 energy structures.
User avatar
Machiosabre
Posts: 1474
Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56

Post by Machiosabre »

are you sure you're not playing some really old version? because I remember that being fixed.
Roseo
Posts: 2
Joined: 26 Aug 2006, 16:56

Post by Roseo »

It just happened in a 2.11 game.
User avatar
Cabbage
Posts: 1548
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 22:34

Post by Cabbage »

its still possible, had someone FPSing a viper on Q20 not too long ago
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

Ain't a bad idea, I think it should stay, cuz It forces players to think, a mediumish ranged missile launcher made into a artillery is good thinking...
Locked

Return to “Game Releases”