Absolute Annihilation 2.11 - Page 101

Absolute Annihilation 2.11

All game release threads should be posted here

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Dragon45
Posts: 2883
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 04:36

Post by Dragon45 »

Doublepost to snag reply #2,000


:lol: :lol:
User avatar
Buggi
Posts: 875
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 07:46

Post by Buggi »

OH, you doubled for #2000? Wow you get the SPECIAL prize. The surpreme spam poster trophy of 2006!
User avatar
Forboding Angel
Evolution RTS Developer
Posts: 14673
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43

Post by Forboding Angel »

arrrgh :(

dragon you took my posts entirely out of context :-(

Graah, I don't feel like explaining it again.
Kixxe
Posts: 1547
Joined: 14 May 2005, 10:02

Post by Kixxe »

By simply tacking on a beefed-up jeothro, you inch closer to making l1 obsolete.
It dosen't matter really, since you need about 2 and › or sometimes 3 times more jethros to shoot down a brawler swarm. I did examples WAYYY back, and you can go dig it up if you really want to. we NEED those level 2 bots, so we get a cost effective way for countering air when not being vechiles. Every other factory gets it, and i do NOT want to go thourth 2 levels of tech tree just to get 1 unit i need. Vechiles are alredy usefull enoguth...
User avatar
Acidd_UK
Posts: 963
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 02:15

Post by Acidd_UK »

Surely 3 jethros are far cheaper than 1 brawler? I.e. they are cost effective...
Kixxe
Posts: 1547
Joined: 14 May 2005, 10:02

Post by Kixxe »

Acidd_UK wrote:Surely 3 jethros are far cheaper than 1 brawler? I.e. they are cost effective...
Acording to 1.46 units stats (prove me wrong if i am >.>). Metal cost jethro: 115 metal cost brawler: 294 Energy is 1000 vs 5700.

So no, not by a great deal.
Besides, it's very clumpsy and it looks awful. 10 brawlers = 30 jethros, which bump into one another.


You can check out more detailed explenation and 2 page rambles if you dig around in the thread >.>
BoredJoe
Posts: 139
Joined: 03 Mar 2006, 01:37

Post by BoredJoe »

the only lvl 2 stuff which is unbalanced atm is the maverick- no amount of lvl 1 spam can beat a mav!
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

Not if I micro it! HAHAHAH! I loved those things....

I would dodge and weave and be like shootin and stuff!
User avatar
Cabbage
Posts: 1548
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 22:34

Post by Cabbage »

yup, maverick is the only ground balance issue tbh.
Egarwaen
Posts: 1207
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 21:19

Post by Egarwaen »

Forboding Angel wrote:@egar, if what #2 of what pxtl suggested was done, then the lv2 factories could be made MUCH cheaper (once again, this is the way that EE does it).

However as it is, lv2 is so much better than lv1, it completely dominates lv1 units.
Um. Yes and no. I do acknowledge that making L2 cheaper and making L2 units worse would do that. But wasn't L2 in EE pretty useless for a very long time? (Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that was the impression I got.) That strikes me as very difficult to balance.

But L2 does not completely dominate L1. A handful of L2 units won't be enough to stop a massive L1 assault (except for the Mav, which appears to be a problem). And even basic L1 units remain useful after you've switched to L2 for your main combat. Most big, slow units are very vulnerable to swarms. And the L1 units work pretty well as a cheap back-up for your defences...
User avatar
Acidd_UK
Posts: 963
Joined: 23 Apr 2006, 02:15

Post by Acidd_UK »

Kixxe wrote:Acording to 1.46 units stats (prove me wrong if i am >.>). Metal cost jethro: 115 metal cost brawler: 294 Energy is 1000 vs 5700.
Yeah ok they are similar cost for metal, but brawler is 2x as expensive in energy and 2x cost in buildtime as well - given it's only a level 1 unit I'd say it's a pretty good counter to brawlers. Especially since 3v1 at least one of the jethros will survive, so it's actually cheaper in terms of the 'big picture'. I think this is a good way to show air is pretty balanced...
User avatar
BigSteve
Posts: 911
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 12:56

Post by BigSteve »

Egarwaen wrote:
Forboding Angel wrote:@egar, if what #2 of what pxtl suggested was done, then the lv2 factories could be made MUCH cheaper (once again, this is the way that EE does it).

However as it is, lv2 is so much better than lv1, it completely dominates lv1 units.
Um. Yes and no. I do acknowledge that making L2 cheaper and making L2 units worse would do that. But wasn't L2 in EE pretty useless for a very long time? (Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that was the impression I got.) That strikes me as very difficult to balance.

But L2 does not completely dominate L1. A handful of L2 units won't be enough to stop a massive L1 assault (except for the Mav, which appears to be a problem). And even basic L1 units remain useful after you've switched to L2 for your main combat. Most big, slow units are very vulnerable to swarms. And the L1 units work pretty well as a cheap back-up for your defences...
QFT
Kixxe
Posts: 1547
Joined: 14 May 2005, 10:02

Post by Kixxe »

Acidd_UK wrote:Yeah ok they are similar cost for metal, but brawler is 2x as expensive in energy and 2x cost in buildtime as well - given it's only a level 1 unit I'd say it's a pretty good counter to brawlers. Especially since 3v1 at least one of the jethros will survive, so it's actually cheaper in terms of the 'big picture'. I think this is a good way to show air is pretty balanced...
Sigh, i guess i have to dig it up myself i guess... AHA! there we go!
Kixxe wrote: E is average, cuz i won't swicth forward and back to note a 200 E diffrence >.>
All arm units

Brawler:M:294 E:5000
Mobile Flakker:M:425 E:8000
Jethro: M:115 E:1000

Now, lets see. 20 brawlers are 5880 metal, and 55 Jethros are 6325. This should kill a brawler (I think) since 50 kills all except 3. now 7 mobile flakker on the other hand costs 2975, which is MUCH more cost effective.
Also, for spice:
Kixxe wrote:I acully tested a litthe.

1 Brawlie kills 1 jethro(duh)
1 Brawlie kills 2 jethro's (Small margin, but still. Can work either way.)

But what about bigger swarms?
20 Brawlers kills 20 jethros
20 brawlers kills 30 Jethros
20 Brawlers kills 50 jethros (again, small margin, but still)

So, to defend myself agsint a moderate, 20 brawler swarm, i need 50+ jethros. Or about 7 Flak tanks. ( i did a shitload of testing there also, but it's hard to tell which is the 10 flak screen or the 6 flak screen)

The reason i'm comparing mobile AA is because this is an offensive situation. If one uses brawlers as defence, it's not possible to attack without flak guns support unless you can micro a shitload of jethros on the frontline with your troops.
And i never DID get my answer to this question.
Kixxe... again wrote: Now, i'll ask again. What reson do you have agsint a Level 2 AA K-bot BESIDES making vechiles a better choice?
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

Gawd you people type fast.

Speedmetal is a cancer. It's insidious. It turns otherwise good players into bad ones who are useless except on speedmetal. These players are no longer playing the same game as the rest of us and might as well not even be here - so if they leave or play a different mod, it's no loss. I hear rumors that they're emo, too.
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

EMO!? KILL THE FUCKIN EMOS!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNMSHxH7JcQ

Sorry, needed a violent song...

Edit: Every one must be stunned speechless :shock:
User avatar
NOiZE
Balanced Annihilation Developer
Posts: 3984
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 19:29

Post by NOiZE »

othe maps could be killed as well such as concept maps with only a few metal spots but those give out a high output, restricting gameplay is bad IMO.
User avatar
Snipawolf
Posts: 4357
Joined: 12 Dec 2005, 01:49

Post by Snipawolf »

IF speedmetalers are emo, its personal! If not, then I could care less, I'll smoke em on real maps when they come out of their games...

Anyhow, I haven't played AA in forever, I might get on today and find any imbas, if I ever get on the good comp :(
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

Maverick, maverick... good movie.

Maverick is meant, in my mind, to be a very good anti-l2 unit. As people have mentioned, it is superb against single powerful L2/L3 units, like goliaths, krogoths, etc. Part of the problem here is that a LOT of things are very good against single L2 units, since in general these units aren't very cost-effective or as powerful as they should rightly be, or are otherwise just not quite right.

I'm going to work on that a bit, but only with small adjustments which should be mostly unnoticable by themselves but when gathered together will make things work better. Small changes, so don't panic. For instance, vehicles faster with more HP (+5% or so to each). This won't have a major influence on battles like one peewee versus one flash, but in large scale battles it will mean that vehicles will get there faster and be the unit of choice of assault, very naturally. Also, L1 and L2 vehicle plants will be made somewhat cheaper to make this tech line more attractive.

I'm also considering further cost reductions to advanced fusions, making them perhaps only 25% more expensive than regular fusions but giving 50% greater output. This would only be available to vehicles.

For mavericks, I was thinking about reducing their fire rate but giving them a much higher damage output. They'd be the weapon of choice for close combat against L1 but especially L2, and arm doesn't really have anything in L2 that's really good at that kind of thing.

I'll also be making more efforts into differentiating the sides, especially at tech 3.
Last edited by Caydr on 20 Aug 2006, 17:41, edited 2 times in total.
Egarwaen
Posts: 1207
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 21:19

Post by Egarwaen »

NOiZE wrote:othe maps could be killed as well such as concept maps with only a few metal spots but those give out a high output, restricting gameplay is bad IMO.
In order to match SpeedMetal, it'd have to be 25+ on a single mex, wouldn't it? I think that would break AA's gameplay pretty badly anyway.

The issue here is that the cost/benefit of AA's mexes (and all other metal costs) is balanced based on "OTA-ish" metal income. Which means each mex has a range from about 0.9 to about 6-8.
User avatar
NOiZE
Balanced Annihilation Developer
Posts: 3984
Joined: 28 Apr 2005, 19:29

Post by NOiZE »

Egarwaen wrote:
NOiZE wrote:othe maps could be killed as well such as concept maps with only a few metal spots but those give out a high output, restricting gameplay is bad IMO.
In order to match SpeedMetal, it'd have to be 25+ on a single mex, wouldn't it? I think that would break AA's gameplay pretty badly anyway.

The issue here is that the cost/benefit of AA's mexes (and all other metal costs) is balanced based on "OTA-ish" metal income. Which means each mex has a range from about 0.9 to about 6-8.
What about a map with 4 spots?


1 for each player... it will have unique gameplay! i see no reason to limit gameplay because of speedmetal, i mean come one, grow up!
Locked

Return to “Game Releases”