Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil) - Page 7

Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post just about everything that isn't directly related to Spring here!

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by Hoi »

HeavyLancer wrote:Whenever people start rubbishing capitalism, I always ask this question:
What is the better alternative economic system?
I actually think there are good alternatives. If you watch this movie, and I mean the entire movie, you might learn something. If you decide to give it a chance, just please watch the whole thing. 2 hours and 40 minutes is long, and the first 10 minutes of the movie might seem dumb to you, but if you watch the entire movie you will get the answers. This movie talks about the problems of society, the current economy, how we are destroying ourselves, and for the first time, it also says what we can do about it (that part starting around halfway).

After that, watch this to see a discussion about some people's problems with the movie and to see why they are incorrect.

I'm going to have to say it again, to fully understand it you have to watch the entire movie, with an open mind. Don't deny everything the movie says for the sake of denying. Watch the movie and see there is another way, and that we have to change.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by TradeMark »

not zeitgeist... i already watched the other movie where they started to tell how to make utopia, and that was... childish. generally i find that movie yet another propaganda/manipulation movie which most people just believe as if it was frigging iphone 6. Sure the movie has some good points, but their intentions behind it are similar to these scams where one guy makes a new religion and takes all their money etc... arent they already collecting money for their utopia...? that would make my day.

i dont believe humans will ever be able to make better society/economic system, unless we genetically engineer everyone to be different... which is not possible since someone will not do it for himself and be the king of earth.

and even if we built utopia, people would start using drugs because only 10% (according to zeitgeist) actually have jobs, and then... you know the rest.
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by Hoi »

TradeMark wrote:not zeitgeist... i already watched the other movie where they started to tell how to make utopia, and that was... childish. generally i find that movie yet another propaganda/manipulation movie which most people just believe as if it was frigging iphone 6. Sure the movie has some good points, but their intentions behind it are similar to these scams where one guy makes a new religion and takes all their money etc... arent they already collecting money for their utopia...? that would make my day.

i dont believe humans will ever be able to make better society/economic system, unless we genetically engineer everyone to be different... which is not possible since someone will not do it for himself and be the king of earth.

and even if we built utopia, people would start using drugs because only 10% (according to zeitgeist) actually have jobs, and then... you know the rest.
They don't want or ask any money. this movie is released for free, and when it came out they organised places and cinemas for people to watch the movie, for free. Free drinks, free food. Free.

Not believing we can do better is foolish, we can do it if we really want to. Also if you had watched the movie you would have seen that we will be forced to do this at some point, because living like we live now will not be possible anymore. The movie discusses this "dna argument" and shows how much influence the environment and society have on how a human grows up. Basically, our society at this point breeds people to be dicks and selfish. If our society would learn people to trust each other and to help each other, we would do exactly that.

Also if you had watched the movie properly you would have seen that because there is no more need for everyone to work 50h a week, we will be able to do what we can do best. Everyone gets good education, so we will all be able to innovate, research, improve, learn, create instead of do simple tasks that can be done by machines. The people who currently are at a low level of education are not there because they are stupid, they are there because society made them stupid or didn't allow them to develop.

Finally, calling something utopia is a worthless argument. You have no way to prove that the image the movie gives you is bad, but you personally don't like it or don't believe in it, so you call it utopia to make it sound ridiculous. Imagine a better world, it can't be possible! Let's not try to improve the world because it is impossible, because it is utopia! Or... not? Maybe it is possible to improve the world if we try?
User avatar
AF
AI Developer
Posts: 20687
Joined: 14 Sep 2004, 11:32

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by AF »

As I understand it, there have been no truly communist states so far, merely dictatorships and oligarchies feigning communism as a means of resource control and state ideology. In practice preferential treatment of officials, disregard of poorer bottom classes, and military expenditure seems rife in 'communist states', which hardly appears to fit with the communist ideology
User avatar
SinbadEV
Posts: 6475
Joined: 02 May 2005, 03:56

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by SinbadEV »

I don't feel like watching your movie but I wanted to say that Communism will only work if it is established by democratic process... for example in canada, if the communist party got a Majority of the seats in the house and started changing laws and constitution type stuff and got the changes approved by senate etc and eventually reached a point where due process required a referendum on the subject and a better part of the population chose to voluntarily take on communism... then yeah sure. I think the problem with all communisms up to this point has been their obsession with overthrowing the current system... revolution puts people in power without due process which invariably leads to corruption.
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by Hoi »

SinbadEV wrote:I don't feel like watching your movie but I wanted to say that Communism will only work if it is established by democratic process... for example in canada, if the communist party got a Majority of the seats in the house and started changing laws and constitution type stuff and got the changes approved by senate etc and eventually reached a point where due process required a referendum on the subject and a better part of the population chose to voluntarily take on communism... then yeah sure. I think the problem with all communisms up to this point has been their obsession with overthrowing the current system... revolution puts people in power without due process which invariably leads to corruption.
I do not, and this movie does not support communism in any way. It is not communism, it is completely different. If you want to understand you'll have to watch the entire thing. It even discusses why it's not communism near the end of the movie.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by TradeMark »

Hoi wrote:Not believing we can do better is foolish, we can do it if we really want to. Also if you had watched the movie you would have seen that we will be forced to do this at some point, because living like we live now will not be possible anymore. The movie discusses this "dna argument" and shows how much influence the environment and society have on how a human grows up. Basically, our society at this point breeds people to be dicks and selfish. If our society would learn people to trust each other and to help each other, we would do exactly that.
yeah, environment makes us who we are, but still, we have basic instincts of being lazy and greed etc... sure we can manipulate our kids to believe stuff like helping others etc, but eventually some dick will figure out that you can manipulate people to get what you want, and then we are in this shit once again.

sure you can go to jungle and have happy lives there helping each other, as if you were one big family, but that doesnt work with 5 billion people. billions of people must die in order to create better society, isnt that what hitler tried?
Hoi wrote:Also if you had watched the movie properly you would have seen that because there is no more need for everyone to work 50h a week, we will be able to do what we can do best. Everyone gets good education, so we will all be able to innovate, research, improve, learn, create instead of do simple tasks that can be done by machines. The people who currently are at a low level of education are not there because they are stupid, they are there because society made them stupid or didn't allow them to develop.
not everyone want to innovate, or etc, not everyone are born to be geniuses. not everyone even want to go to school, some people have learning defects, some people are blind and deaf, some people are just plain retarded, some people have mental problems, such as depression that are genetic. also what would motivate people making free stuff to everyone? why wouldnt they just sit on the sofa and watch others free stuff coming from TV ?

also have you thought why people in the jungle dont have computers nor science? they dont care about such stuff... they dont need to. once human dont need to do anything extra, what he will do... he just be lazy ass and take the closest beer from the table... to make people stop being lazy, we need to motivate people to actually live their lives, but that raises question, why do we need to make people to live their lives and why cant we just let them stop existing and worrying about better societies etc? realistic place where utopia works is where everyone are dead.

also, do we need machines to improve our lives? people are perfectly happy in the jungle. i find it disturbing that we are going to build utopia which is based upon the artificial needs we created in this disgusting world. and knowing people, everyone needs the same stuff everyone else has, and there it fails, because when we want to have that stuff, we will take that stuff... have you ever observed kids playing? one kid will eventually take the toy of another kid, and make everyone crying, that is genetic, nobody taught that kid to take the toy, the kid was just being selfish and not thinking others, since they dont have the brainpower required for that yet, and some people will born with such defects that will make them unable to have empathy.

as i said... one way to make utopia to work is to kill everyone and start from clean table again, genetically engineer everyone to be clones of each other, identical. but even then, some clone will get better ideas than someone else and then the jellyboi war starts again... not to mention that one disease could kill everyone anyways.
Hoi wrote:Finally, calling something utopia is a worthless argument. You have no way to prove that the image the movie gives you is bad, but you personally don't like it or don't believe in it, so you call it utopia to make it sound ridiculous. Imagine a better world, it can't be possible! Let's not try to improve the world because it is impossible, because it is utopia! Or... not? Maybe it is possible to improve the world if we try?
as i noted above, its not going to work, unless we kill everyone.

sure you can make your own bubble somewhere, but what will guarantee others outside of the bubble will help you when a meteor suddenly broke your bubble ? or a earth quake? you have to rely on others all around the world to be able to do so... and no government is going to allow such bubbles to be built with their expenses, and everyone is going to be so jealous and trying to destroy your perfect society eventually anyways. not to mention terrorists calling you infidels etc.

it would be cool to prove utopia actually working with a computer simulated world. and i know you will end up always creating new problems when you try to fix another problem. and it will end up into something fucked up you dont want to live in, or ironically it would end up exactly where we live today.
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by Hoi »

You're very ignorant and it's impossible to argue with you, so I'm not even going to try anymore. Start coming with facts instead of opinions, opinions are not facts. You claim to have watched the movie yet everything you say contradicts that. You either didn't see it at all or didn't pay attention, if you want to continue this discussion take some time to watch the movie and understand it, so you know what we're talking about.

"It's not going to work" is not an argument, and you simply can't prove that it won't work. We haven't even tried yet. The only limiting factor is us, and we can change ourselves if we see that it's for the good.

Just one thing I want to comment on.
not everyone want to innovate, or etc, not everyone are born to be geniuses. not everyone even want to go to school, some people have learning defects, some people are blind and deaf, some people are just plain retarded, some people have mental problems, such as depression that are genetic. also what would motivate people making free stuff to everyone? why wouldnt they just sit on the sofa and watch others free stuff coming from TV ?
Not everyone wants to innovate? Right, so people want to do machine jobs like make tshirts 70 hours a week, like many people in china/etc do right now because we want cheap clothes. People are not born to be something, they are taught to be something. Hitler didn't kill jews because he simply is an evil person, society made him an evil person. Everyone has the same potential, some are just more lucky than others. I'm very sure many if not all people who for example die because of poverty could be brilliant scientists, if only they would get the proper education and things like food and shelter. Yes, genetic disorders exist, but those only affect a relatively small amount of people.

Finally.... the movie never says anything about killing people. It's not like we have to kill people to create this better society, you're just making that up. That is what hitler said, yes, but it's not what this movie or idea says. What is said is that with the resources we have we can make a much better world for everyone, we only have to actually go and do it instead of fucking around destroying everything like we're doing right now.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by TradeMark »

Hoi wrote:The only limiting factor is us, and we can change ourselves if we see that it's for the good.
as i explained in my post, this factor is what makes it impossible, we cant change 5 billion people... as i said.. it only works in small societies, this is why people must die to make this work... people will rather die than suddenly change their lifestyle, because they are afraid someone will not follow and they would live worser life than the others who continues like before...
Hoi wrote:Not everyone wants to innovate? Right, so people want to do machine jobs like make tshirts 70 hours a week
in a world with no jobs, those people who dont want to innovate, would just do nothing else than have fun, or just watch TV and get fat.
Hoi wrote:People are not born to be something, they are taught to be something.
some people are born to be musicians for the fact their brains are built that way to understand music better than others. Some people are good at maths etc... people are totally born into those. you can sure train yourself to be good in some area to some extent, but you will never reach the point those people have who born with those abilities.
Hoi wrote:Hitler didn't kill jews because he simply is an evil person, society made him an evil person. Everyone has the same potential, some are just more lucky than others.
As i explained earlier post which you probably ignored: some people are born with defects in their brains which makes them incapable of feeling empathy or other things. that is mostly why evil people exist. thinking that we all have the same potential is just so wrong and actually a bad thing because that will just alienate the different people from the majority and then again they will become alcoholics etc.
Hoi wrote:Yes, genetic disorders exist, but those only affect a relatively small amount of people.
heh. how many people Hitler affected...?
Hoi wrote:Finally.... the movie never says anything about killing people. It's not like we have to kill people to create this better society, you're just making that up.
i didnt imply the movie said that... i just concluded that we have to kill everyone to be able to build this society because otherwise others would interfere because of the bad way how they were raised.
Hoi wrote:That is what hitler said, yes, but it's not what this movie or idea says. What is said is that with the resources we have we can make a much better world for everyone, we only have to actually go and do it instead of fucking around destroying everything like we're doing right now
yes we can, but we cant sustain that for the reasons i explained earlier, human nature etc.. thats why we have to kill everyone to actually sustain it.. but even then, it just cant work... (read my post again)

Edit:
Hoi wrote:You're very ignorant and it's impossible to argue with you, so I'm not even going to try anymore. Start coming with facts instead of opinions, opinions are not facts
your "facts" are as much just opinions as my arguments were... who can ever prove these are facts anyways? nobody...everything is just opinions. if you want to prove my opinions wrong, then you better show something against my ideas that will somehow prove me wrong... just because million people agree to a video you watched doesnt make it fact
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by smoth »

Fukushima thread gets posts, think it is update, see that it is socioeconomic bickering get disappoint.
User avatar
TradeMark
Posts: 4867
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:58

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by TradeMark »

go bitch elsewhere plz...

just by looking at your posts on this thread its too obvious you dont give a shit about the thread, until now when its me who is making slight offtopic here, heh...
User avatar
Hoi
Posts: 2917
Joined: 13 May 2008, 16:51

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by Hoi »

Trademark you try to prove me wrong simply by saying human beings are selfish dicks by default and nothing can be done to change that. If this is the truth, then why are there people who help other people, and why have people like ghandi ever existed? Humanity already made huge progress.

This change isn't something that will happen overnight, we can slowly reach it. People can change, humanity has already changed in the past.

For example in a world without jobs I would spend a lot of time on innovation, doing research and inventing things. I'd love to help humanity by curing a disease or doing research on something. Maybe it's just your personal opinion that you don't care and want to be lazy, but again if you would have watched the movie properly you would have seen arguments that against this idea that we would all become lazy.

About this human potential thing it's another opinion. You assume it's determined at birth how people become, but I think society plays an enormous role. Sure some people will be interested in other things but everyone has potential, right now society doesn't allow many people to reach their potential (examples are poor people, people who don't get good education, etc). Under the correct conditions everyone can learn the things to become useful to society, be it music, science, art, philosophy, literature, anything except a simple job that can be done by a machine.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by smoth »

TradeMark wrote:go bitch elsewhere plz...

just by looking at your posts on this thread its too obvious you dont give a shit about the thread, until now when its me who is making slight offtopic here, heh...
Fukushima is in Japan
Japan is home to bandai
Bandai makes gundam
Gundam is the project I have given 6 years of my free time to
Japan hurts gundam does = me giving a fuck

Nigga please
User avatar
SinbadEV
Posts: 6475
Joined: 02 May 2005, 03:56

Re: Fukushima disaster level raised to level 7 (like chernobil)

Post by SinbadEV »

smoth wrote:Fukushima thread gets posts, think it is update, see that it is socioeconomic bickering get disappoint.

Thread is getting too long and unwieldy to properly split up anymore... there's stuff about solar power in there, and then the original topics etc... perhaps if the next guy who wants to post on one of these topics could make a new topic with a link to this one?
Locked

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”