Agreed, but it's what we're stuck with. I was hoping for some time that google would release a linux based operating system, but that's pretty much a bust now. If google released an operating system then it would be pretty much gauranteed to gain immediate traction.Pxtl wrote:Umm, did microsoft make Photoshop? Cubase? Spring? No. Microsoft made Windows and office and crap like that. And if they weren't around, PS and cubase and suchlike would've been made for a different, possibly superiour operating system.Forboding Angel wrote:ok well I need to b able to run phtoshop cs, cubase sx, spring, guild wars, other misc games on it, as well as the other little programs that are only distributed as windows binaries.
THat's the problem. Linux may be more usable, but I don't care to compile every new program I get, and I can do roughly 20% of what I need on linux due to the filesystem being different.
And don't even mention gimp. Gimp is pathetic in comparison to PS CS. And audacity is nowhere even close to being in CuBase's league.
I'm not saying that windows isn't the way to go. I'm saying it sucks. If the only car in the world was a Ford Pinto or home-made cars built by auto mechanics, we'd all drive a pinto for the convenience - but it'd still be a Pinto, and it would still suck.
BTW do me a favor and stop speaking to me as though I don't thouroughly understand all of this. I was simply stating that the poor open source OS world is pretty damn sucky.
WHy are there 50 billion offshoots of linux systems? If those developers had put all their heads together then the rest of us would be much better off. Meh. Still we have linux systems that are damn hard to use and practically impossible for the average user to get a grasp on. PLUS... Would it be THAT difficult to incorporate readability of NTFS into linux? If so, why? If not, then why the fuck wasn't thios done in the first place?!