Absolute Annihilation 2.11

krogothe · Post by **krogothe** » 19 Jun 2006, 08:38

again, specific damages suck, would be nice if they just didnt target planes instead of ignoring the land attacks just because theres an avenger moving around.

Dwarden · Post by **Dwarden** » 19 Jun 2006, 08:59

Caydr i got question, can we get repulsing structure back ?

i mean it is different than shield not in effect how handles incoming or own shots but also with shield enemy can see where is "edge" and precisely wipe out all outside instead thinking if it's worth to bother fire at structure xy

of course it eats more energy per shot etc

Dr.InfernO · Post by **Dr.InfernO** » 19 Jun 2006, 11:53

Bhaal wrote:...
maybe sumos should get a range boost ?

I agree on that. Sumos could need a bit better range.

NOiZE · Post by **NOiZE** » 19 Jun 2006, 11:57

also does decals below buildings are kinda ugly, i think AA is better off without them

Soulless1 · Post by **Soulless1** » 19 Jun 2006, 14:15

nah, i just reckon they need reducing in size so they don't overlap cos that looks weird....

and the devs need to find a way to stop the grass etc from showing through

Egarwaen · Post by **Egarwaen** » 19 Jun 2006, 16:50

Grass used to (and probably still does) show through the "runway" of the air factory too. Now that looks weird.

Dwarden · Post by **Dwarden** » 19 Jun 2006, 17:03

can we get some mobile ship shield holder ?

Rayden · Post by **Rayden** » 19 Jun 2006, 17:28

Shielded booooombers

Caydr · Post by **Caydr** » 19 Jun 2006, 18:19

Pretty sure weapon AoE goes through shields, so for a bomber to have a shield it'd have to be about 256 units in diameter (more than half of current shield building range) in order to be effective. Unfortunate, that. Ideally any weapon impacting a shield should have its AoE reduced to 1/10 or something.

Egarwaen · Post by **Egarwaen** » 19 Jun 2006, 18:20

Caydr wrote:Ideally any weapon impacting a shield should have its AoE reduced to 1/10 or something.

Or the shield should have a tag specifying the reduction.

submarine · Post by **submarine** » 19 Jun 2006, 19:27

NOiZE wrote:also does decals below buildings are kinda ugly, i think AA is better off without them

please remove them, i dont know what they are supposed to be good for, but they are looking really ugly

plz remove them

espylaub · Post by **espylaub** » 19 Jun 2006, 20:12

submarine wrote:
NOiZE wrote:also does decals below buildings are kinda ugly, i think AA is better off without them
please remove them, i dont know what they are supposed to be good for, but they are looking really ugly

plz remove them

Thirded. They don't serve a purpose and and generally irritating. Sorry if that sounds harsh, but they really annoy me.

Cabbage · Post by **Cabbage** » 19 Jun 2006, 20:23

I like them

Comp1337 · Post by **Comp1337** » 19 Jun 2006, 22:21

Me too... I was put off first, but it looks gay without them now.

Dr.InfernO · Post by **Dr.InfernO** » 19 Jun 2006, 22:59

I like them too.

Egarwaen · Post by **Egarwaen** » 19 Jun 2006, 23:11

They look surprisingly good. I think it'd be perfect if they were just a little smaller?

unpossible · Post by **unpossible** » 19 Jun 2006, 23:12

i think they look too imposing - perhaps some more subtle colouring and a smaller size. more like it's part of the structure itself that's been layed onto the terrain. maybe i'll have a play with paintshop tomorrow and see what happens.

Eaglebird · Post by **Eaglebird** » 20 Jun 2006, 00:31

I like them. They look like you put 'pavement' or something down around your plant.

2pacalypse · Post by **2pacalypse** » 20 Jun 2006, 00:41

Just chiming in to say that I like the new pavement decals. They're especially handy when spotting things in your opponent's base! :)

j5mello · Post by **j5mello** » 20 Jun 2006, 01:33

i don't care one way or the other about the decals, but if u decide to keep them make sure that the Forges in the F version of AA get them as well

Spring RTS Engine

Absolute Annihilation 2.11