Ch(e)ating
Moderator: Moderators
Ch(e)ating
ok i just got done playing a game with soulhunter.....the game was com end and i killed it after walking through his def with 15 can 20 min in the game. so what does he do....he starts telling his team mates what to do to win....and we lost because of it....now i would like to suggest a way to silence spects so they cant ch(e)at like this because it is very frustrating.....
- TechnoTone
- Posts: 165
- Joined: 23 Aug 2005, 22:02
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
Just don't play with those types of people ever again.
On the other hand, if you opponent wins or is doing well, don't accuse him of cheating. I was playing in a game on Painted Desert where there were like 4 specs. One of my teammates had 3 BBs... and I had a cloaked sniper in the enemy base, spotting enemy buildings for the BB fire.
The other team, including the host of the game, accused the specs of ghosting and kicked them all. Needless to say, my team and I kept our mouths shut and didn't tell him about the spy. The other team, primarily the host of the game, were confused as hell and mad as hell when we kept hitting their base with accurate BB fire.
The whole episode was rather funny, but I felt somewhat sorry for the specs.
On the other hand, if you opponent wins or is doing well, don't accuse him of cheating. I was playing in a game on Painted Desert where there were like 4 specs. One of my teammates had 3 BBs... and I had a cloaked sniper in the enemy base, spotting enemy buildings for the BB fire.
The other team, including the host of the game, accused the specs of ghosting and kicked them all. Needless to say, my team and I kept our mouths shut and didn't tell him about the spy. The other team, primarily the host of the game, were confused as hell and mad as hell when we kept hitting their base with accurate BB fire.
The whole episode was rather funny, but I felt somewhat sorry for the specs.
Re: Ch(e)ating
KillerD wrote:...soulhunter...
not to be confused with me!


Since specs cant private chat, they have to say whatever they want to say to players in public chat, then if they start spilling info, you can use the good ole' .kick playername command.
But as Fanger mentioned, specs with teamspeak and other private connections may be an issue...But I havent dealt with this ever, and spring has a generally good, fair-playing community
But as Fanger mentioned, specs with teamspeak and other private connections may be an issue...But I havent dealt with this ever, and spring has a generally good, fair-playing community
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
Except when specs have those hella weird names or names with characters that an englist keyboard does not have.LOrDo wrote:Since specs cant private chat, they have to say whatever they want to say to players in public chat, then if they start spilling info, you can use the good ole' .kick playername command.
perhaps specs could have an Allies thing-e and that would allow them to talk to just each other?
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
"s:" is spectator only comunication, additionally "a:" when used by specs is only seen by other specs, in game players can't see it. I assume you already knew this, so you're going to need to further clarify what you mean because I can't see how it's different then the structures we already have.smoth wrote:Except when specs have those hella weird names or names with characters that an englist keyboard does not have.LOrDo wrote:Since specs cant private chat, they have to say whatever they want to say to players in public chat, then if they start spilling info, you can use the good ole' .kick playername command.
perhaps specs could have an Allies thing-e and that would allow them to talk to just each other?
I hope that you improve the whole communications system if you are going to do that change. You did it already with lobby chatting system. You know you've improved it when you have better control over system in simpler package.
I've no proposation how could you possibly improve it thought. Ask yourself how could you possibly improve IRC -protocol?
btw. if you change it so that spectators can't talk to players, what prevents spectators from giving instructions trough IRC, game lobby or MSN?
I've no proposation how could you possibly improve it thought. Ask yourself how could you possibly improve IRC -protocol?
btw. if you change it so that spectators can't talk to players, what prevents spectators from giving instructions trough IRC, game lobby or MSN?
- wizard8873
- Posts: 254
- Joined: 21 Jan 2006, 02:42
how about instead of all of that, give the option of rating a player. if you find a player is cheating, report it to one of the mods and send him the replay. they put a warning level assigned to the players name and a comment if you want to see it in detail. i know that they could create a new account but if this can be implemented, maybe there is a way we can lockit down to their IP as well. i would say that give this option to players but i could just see it being abused when a player loses a match and wants to get back at their opponent.
i think the only true solution for this problem is, to prevent the spectators from seeing what their teammates dont see. so they cant tell them anything. this means, if a player from team 0 is out he can only see what team 0 sees. even if the team is in the same room, they cant tell each other anything. implementing this as an option would still leave the possibility to spec like it is today.
(i think CS had something similar with as deathcam...)
(i think CS had something similar with as deathcam...)