But they will be round, even up close, with many less sides, since spring smooths anytime it finds 6 or more faces around a central point. I would think 8 sides would be plenty, similar to the way you did the base of the barrel.
Aside from that, the cannons look good, but the base could use some beefing up, I feel. Think about the amount of recoil guns like that are goint to generate.
Unless that's a design decision, the base of the turret doesn't have to be hexagonal. A more rounded one could maybe look better... but that's just my opinion. The model's improved significantly, that's a good sign. :)
Leaderz0rz wrote:the base looks odd.. and you don't need so many sides for the barrel..since it will usally be seen from afar they don't have to be really round.
Leaderz0rz wrote:the base looks odd.. and you don't need so many sides for the barrel..since it will usally be seen from afar they don't have to be really round.
did you even read the whole thread?
Did you? That was the first reply in the thread...
I think, from what you last showed us, that a little more attention should be paid to the actual turret now. Not too much, but think about a big gun:
The barrel doesn't usually have a boxy breach and nice round barrel. Detail the breach some, but not too much to make it unrenderable.
That is, if it's going down as a base defense kind of turret.
Leaderz0rz wrote:the base looks odd.. and you don't need so many sides for the barrel..since it will usally be seen from afar they don't have to be really round.