Is this game more graphicly demanding than warcraft 3? - Page 2

Is this game more graphicly demanding than warcraft 3?

Various things about Spring that do not fit in any of the other forums listed below, including forum rules.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
SinbadEV
Posts: 6475
Joined: 02 May 2005, 03:56

Post by SinbadEV »

Atari has gone the way of the titanic 3 times, the name is cursed... the current incarnation contains elements of no less then 3 decimated companies that have been "bought out" when the atari name destroyed them... I belive the current incarnation is acctually "Interplay" or "Hasbro Interactive"...

edit: I have not facts whatsoever to back up these statements, so don't ask...
User avatar
FoeOfTheBee
Posts: 557
Joined: 12 May 2005, 18:26

Post by FoeOfTheBee »

Archangel of Death wrote:In case you all haven't heard, rumor has it Atari is going the way of the Titanic.
Maybe someone in France should give them a call and see if they will release OTA into the public domain, or at least release the unit related content.

If it weren't long distance, I would do it myself. If I spoke French.

http://corporate.infogrames.com/worldwideoffices.html
User avatar
SinbadEV
Posts: 6475
Joined: 02 May 2005, 03:56

Post by SinbadEV »

infograms only holds the licence to distribute atari products... they are not atari
User avatar
Drone_Fragger
Posts: 1341
Joined: 04 Dec 2005, 15:49

Post by Drone_Fragger »

heh, INfrogames ARE atari.
User avatar
SinbadEV
Posts: 6475
Joined: 02 May 2005, 03:56

Post by SinbadEV »

huh... it appears you are correct... whatever happened to the midway/atari thing...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midway_Games wrote:...in 1996, WMS also purchased Time-Warner Interactive, which included Atari Games, part of the former giant Atari.
User avatar
Dr.InfernO
Posts: 223
Joined: 18 Nov 2005, 13:55

Post by Dr.InfernO »

anyway it would be good for spring.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

*sighs* yeah it is more demanding then warcraftIII.

however, it also has MANY features that would explain that like:

Larger maps
Larger see-able area
Larger armies

I can honestly tell you that I borked the unit cap once for wc3... and 3 players at a 250 food limit was eating my fps.
User avatar
SinbadEV
Posts: 6475
Joined: 02 May 2005, 03:56

Post by SinbadEV »

smoth wrote:*sighs* yeah it is more demanding then warcraftIII.

however, it also has MANY features that would explain that like:

Larger maps
Larger see-able area
Larger armies
Don't Forget Boats!
AJvdb
Posts: 6
Joined: 31 May 2006, 04:34

Post by AJvdb »

ok i can play the game alright when 400 missile raven dudes arent bombing me.

what option changes the mountains, so they arent... raised squares
mongus
Posts: 1463
Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 18:52

Post by mongus »

someone put this all noob advice stuff in the wiki for once. :x
User avatar
PauloMorfeo
Posts: 2004
Joined: 15 Dec 2004, 20:53

Re: Is this game more graphicly demanding than warcraft 3?

Post by PauloMorfeo »

AJvdb wrote:...
and do i need to have the original TA installed on my computer, ...
No. You only need to *own* the game.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”