Absolute Annihilation: Spring 1.46
Moderator: Moderators
- RedDragonGecko
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 08 Jan 2006, 17:15
Do the jammers actually obscure your own radar in AA? I know a lot of people said they did, but I could swear I've seen radar blips in areas I'm jamming during games.Soulless1 wrote:It's really annoying trying to cover any kind of area with the little ones, and often you don't want a huge one near the frontlines cause it'll obscure your own radar
Solution, dragon's eyes.
If you players don't use these little beauties, you need a short education in planning.
I can't even count how many times those little things have saved my ass from flank assaults, or even as sneaky spotters for my defencive lines.
They're probably my single favorite unit in AA, as they function as mini radar stations that are very hard to detect and give a nice little radius to add LOS, and as long as you have power they rarely are ever discovered.
If you players don't use these little beauties, you need a short education in planning.
I can't even count how many times those little things have saved my ass from flank assaults, or even as sneaky spotters for my defencive lines.
They're probably my single favorite unit in AA, as they function as mini radar stations that are very hard to detect and give a nice little radius to add LOS, and as long as you have power they rarely are ever discovered.
- Machiosabre
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56
I like jammers the way they are, the lvl1 ones you have to really look where to put em to cover your stuff and the lvl2 ones to just put in the back and stop worrying about.
It's better this way since when you attack and kill the lvl2 jammer its really cool since you gain alot of information, if it'd be a network of lvl2 jammers or something it'd really take away from that moment.
It's better this way since when you attack and kill the lvl2 jammer its really cool since you gain alot of information, if it'd be a network of lvl2 jammers or something it'd really take away from that moment.
The ARM, Sneaky Pete cloaked jammer should be the staple LVL-1 jammer, it can cloak when need be and it has a great range.
Core's little baby jammer is quite easily destroyed and has a tiny radius, well about the range of a llt or smaller if I remember right.
I know that the LVL2 Kbot lab is not always an option on all maps, and that alot of people like to use vehicles instead of the Mech domination path through Kbot progression.
That being said though, as Scout lvl2-Kbots the Infiltrator and Paracite have no equal when it comes to scouting.
Core's little baby jammer is quite easily destroyed and has a tiny radius, well about the range of a llt or smaller if I remember right.
I know that the LVL2 Kbot lab is not always an option on all maps, and that alot of people like to use vehicles instead of the Mech domination path through Kbot progression.
That being said though, as Scout lvl2-Kbots the Infiltrator and Paracite have no equal when it comes to scouting.
- Drone_Fragger
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 04 Dec 2005, 15:49
And the massive range of the enemies jammer jams your own units ^-^Machiosabre wrote:I like jammers the way they are, the lvl1 ones you have to really look where to put em to cover your stuff and the lvl2 ones to just put in the back and stop worrying about.
It's better this way since when you attack and kill the lvl2 jammer its really cool since you gain alot of information, if it'd be a network of lvl2 jammers or something it'd really take away from that moment.
Comparing the two using the new unit guide...MR.D wrote:The ARM, Sneaky Pete cloaked jammer should be the staple LVL-1 jammer, it can cloak when need be and it has a great range.
Core's little baby jammer is quite easily destroyed and has a tiny radius, well about the range of a llt or smaller if I remember right.
The Castro has just over half the jamming radius of the Sneaky Pete. That means a quarter the area, if I remember my geometry right.
The Castro costs half as much metal, just over half as much energy, and just under half as much buildtime.
The Castro has about a tenth the HP, costs 75% as much energy to operate, and can't cloak.
I think Core definitely gets the short end of the stick there.
sure core gets short here, but who needs 2 mirrored armys? I like that they differ, more fun.
All in all 1.46 is looking VERY good atm. No big balance issues and gameplay is awsome. I still feel bad that we lost criuse missile launchers, they were great to kill last remainng porces when u allready had all the map. Without them it just takes more time when game is allready decided.
GJ otherwise cadyr but please be carefull about kbot AA, dont make it too good or they could be spammed all aorund the map on all hillse making air even less usefull.
All in all 1.46 is looking VERY good atm. No big balance issues and gameplay is awsome. I still feel bad that we lost criuse missile launchers, they were great to kill last remainng porces when u allready had all the map. Without them it just takes more time when game is allready decided.
GJ otherwise cadyr but please be carefull about kbot AA, dont make it too good or they could be spammed all aorund the map on all hillse making air even less usefull.
Whoa, shows what I get for playing Core. You mean that that cloaked Jammer tower is a friggin l1 unit? I always thought it was l2, and assumed they had some Castro-esque POS that I'd never seen (since I only use the Castro in crucial points, like a tight wad of HLTs and a mortar).Egarwaen wrote:Comparing the two using the new unit guide...MR.D wrote:The ARM, Sneaky Pete cloaked jammer should be the staple LVL-1 jammer, it can cloak when need be and it has a great range.
Core's little baby jammer is quite easily destroyed and has a tiny radius, well about the range of a llt or smaller if I remember right.
The Castro has just over half the jamming radius of the Sneaky Pete. That means a quarter the area, if I remember my geometry right.
The Castro costs half as much metal, just over half as much energy, and just under half as much buildtime.
The Castro has about a tenth the HP, costs 75% as much energy to operate, and can't cloak.
I think Core definitely gets the short end of the stick there.
Yes. There could be some other balancing factor that I'm missing, of course. But just comparing jammer against jammer, Core seems to get screwed in terms of cost/benefit.Pxtl wrote:Whoa, shows what I get for playing Core. You mean that that cloaked Jammer tower is a friggin l1 unit? I always thought it was l2, and assumed they had some Castro-esque POS that I'd never seen (since I only use the Castro in crucial points, like a tight wad of HLTs and a mortar).
Thinking it over, you could work this around. Keep the Castro's cost high (maybe even raise it a little - anything but the build time) but ramp up it's armour to very high levels (like on par with an HLT) and drop it's energy cost down to 20% (making sensible in comparison with a longer-ranged cloaked tower). Now you have a jammer that you can build and forget about - it's hardened and low-power. Even at L2, you use them as backup systems if your main jammer fails - they're small and tough, and cheap enough to use as backups. All that would make up for their abysmal range.Egarwaen wrote:Yes. There could be some other balancing factor that I'm missing, of course. But just comparing jammer against jammer, Core seems to get screwed in terms of cost/benefit.Pxtl wrote:Whoa, shows what I get for playing Core. You mean that that cloaked Jammer tower is a friggin l1 unit? I always thought it was l2, and assumed they had some Castro-esque POS that I'd never seen (since I only use the Castro in crucial points, like a tight wad of HLTs and a mortar).
Also, I recently had an odd thought - how about turning the Buzzsaw back into it's old Core Contingency self? Crappy range, high cost - but make it High Trajectory. Then you'd get the old fun of trying to see if you could build one of these things close enough to the enemy base to clobber him, even from behind cover.
Okay, quick question.
Just looking at the unit stats and something eludes me: what's the point of the mobile artillery vehicles? I mean, they're high-trajectory, which is functionally the same as starburst rockets like the Diplomat have. For the life of me I can't figure when the Pillager should be used in the place of a Diplomat, or in the case of hovers, when the Navarone should be used in the place of it's corresponding unit. I mean, the range is similar, the damage is similar, and the unit cost is similar. Why have this coke/pepsi decision in the place of artillery? They both chuck explosives over walls at long range. In OTA it made sense since the artillery units were low-trajectory, and thus could be used in anti-unit combat like a Morty. But what here?
This redundancy is particularly apparent in the case of Core, where their big "special unit" in the lev2 vehicle plant is yet-another-artillery unit (albeit a really nice one in the Tremor).
This redundancy is particularly apparent in the case of Core, where their big "special unit" in the lev2 vehicle plant is yet-another-artillery unit (albeit a really nice one in the Tremor).
- Machiosabre
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: 25 Dec 2005, 22:56