.:Map Retuxture:. Foothills

.:Map Retuxture:. Foothills

All map release threads should be posted here

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Forboding Angel
Evolution RTS Developer
Posts: 14673
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43

.:Map Retuxture:. Foothills

Post by Forboding Angel »

Fully retextured and quite beautiful.

Download here:
http://fileuniverse.com/?p=download&uni ... d7&ID=2708

Screens (remember, my gfx settings are at the absolute lowest):

Image

Image
User avatar
LathanStanley
Posts: 1429
Joined: 20 Jun 2005, 05:16

Post by LathanStanley »

why not add features to it??

its not THAT hard to add a few rocks.... I've got quite a few done... :roll:
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Post by Das Bruce »

Is that a lvl2 GD factory?
User avatar
Maelstrom
Posts: 1950
Joined: 23 Jul 2005, 14:52

Post by Maelstrom »

Its to flat. Im guessing an OTA height map? The texture does look good, and deserves a better height map.
User avatar
Forboding Angel
Evolution RTS Developer
Posts: 14673
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43

Post by Forboding Angel »

mael... you've never heard of foothills? Good lord dude that map has been around forever. It is an ota remake dude. Me rolls eyes.
User avatar
Maelstrom
Posts: 1950
Joined: 23 Jul 2005, 14:52

Post by Maelstrom »

Classic OTA map or not, using an OTA height map just doesnt look that good.
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Post by Das Bruce »

It looks fine, the texture is great, the heightmap lets it down slightly.
User avatar
Forboding Angel
Evolution RTS Developer
Posts: 14673
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43

Post by Forboding Angel »

hmm, how expectations change. Back when I first made foothills I was getting all kinda of praise lol.

It's a remake. It has also been around is a super crappy texture for a LONG time which I have finally fixed. There is nothing wrong with ota heightmaps. Back then we used what we could which meant tiles. THe maps that played well back then play well now.

Try it before you notch it down.

As far as the texture. Look for my next greenworld map. However I have 2 more retextures to go and them I'm doing a map for reddragon, and THEN! I will make another greenworld map.
User avatar
LathanStanley
Posts: 1429
Joined: 20 Jun 2005, 05:16

Post by LathanStanley »

I'll say it again...

FEATURES! :roll:
User avatar
Forboding Angel
Evolution RTS Developer
Posts: 14673
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43

Post by Forboding Angel »

Hey! I'll say it again... This is a really old map. Do I give a damn about it? No. This map is not new. The original was posted on Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:01 am.

THe only reason I'm spending time retexturing is because a friend and a few others asked me to retexture it.
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Post by Das Bruce »

Ota heightmaps are worst on water maps.
User avatar
GrOuNd_ZeRo
Posts: 1370
Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 01:10

Post by GrOuNd_ZeRo »

What mod is that?
User avatar
Min3mat
Posts: 3455
Joined: 17 Nov 2004, 20:19

Post by Min3mat »

I'll say it again...

FEATURES!
Lathan...you don't need features...it diminishes the quality of some maps IMO
User avatar
Das Bruce
Posts: 3544
Joined: 23 Nov 2005, 06:16

Post by Das Bruce »

GrOuNd_ZeRo wrote:What mod is that?
War3170
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Post by SwiftSpear »

Min3mat wrote:
I'll say it again...

FEATURES!
Lathan...you don't need features...it diminishes the quality of some maps IMO
LOL F33TURS AR3 RUL3 NOOB!!!!!11!1one

*ahem* I mean I disagree. I think features always add to a map when used properly.
User avatar
hrmph
Posts: 1054
Joined: 12 May 2005, 20:08

Post by hrmph »

Looks much nicer with the new texture. Sweet.
Post Reply

Return to “Map Releases”