..:: Release ::.. Red River and Red River North

NOiZE · Post by **NOiZE** » 09 Mar 2006, 16:46

Another remake of a classic TA map, i slighty touched the height map so it looks a bit better imo.

Some Screens

Red River (20x30)

Red River North (20x14)

DOWNLOAD "Red River Remake"

DOWNLOAD "Red River North Remake"

Have Fun

FizWizz · Post by **FizWizz** » 09 Mar 2006, 16:59

<3 <3 <3

I've always liked Red River

PicassoCT · Post by **PicassoCT** » 09 Mar 2006, 17:47

I always lost on Red River - but will download it anyway - if it is just to see those Vulcan Fireflowers in my Base :)

Hansolo88 · Post by **Hansolo88** » 09 Mar 2006, 20:26

I love it. How deformable is the terrain?

Maelstrom · Post by **Maelstrom** » 10 Mar 2006, 03:49

A hill souldnt look like a pimple. Basically all the OTA maps ported to Spring have really flat terrain, except for pimple hills. Come on, this map would be good if the terrain looked a little realistic. IM not talking massive hills that hinder base building, but just a small variation to keep it interesting...

mufdvr222 · Post by **mufdvr222** » 10 Mar 2006, 04:25

To be fair the hills on the OTA map where small even by TA standards.

Das Bruce · Post by **Das Bruce** » 10 Mar 2006, 05:36

How many times do people have to be told? DON'T USE OTA HEIGHTMAPS.

Forboding Angel · Post by **Forboding Angel** » 10 Mar 2006, 10:22

Actually I think it looks good, however, Noize, you might try using a heavy guassian blur on the heightmap and compiling with the scal of -x 200 -n -100 that should serve it quite well.

Just a thought. Personally I like it. It is very much true to ota, even if ota maps didn't really look right sometimes.

NOiZE · Post by **NOiZE** » 10 Mar 2006, 11:07

Das Bruce wrote:How many times do people have to be told? DON'T USE OTA HEIGHTMAPS.

You can stop telling that to me, because i won't listen to you on that point

smoth · Post by **smoth** » 10 Mar 2006, 11:12

Das Bruce wrote:How many times do people have to be told? DON'T USE OTA HEIGHTMAPS.

I am... with some heavy modification

Das Bruce · Post by **Das Bruce** » 10 Mar 2006, 11:40

smoth wrote:
Das Bruce wrote:How many times do people have to be told? DON'T USE OTA HEIGHTMAPS.
I am... with some heavy modification

With modifications they're fine, but otherwise they're just bland and ugly.

SeanHeron · Post by **SeanHeron** » 25 Mar 2006, 09:02

Well done Noize, looks good (have yet to play a game on it though).
Would it be possible to pack Red River North into Red River (as it uses the same height, metal and texture maps I should guess..) as done in River Dale (which includes Cliff Run, Hill Haven...)? It would be nice to save people the 9 MB download.

NOiZE · Post by **NOiZE** » 25 Mar 2006, 11:33

i could, but didn't because of lazyness

Torrasque · Post by **Torrasque** » 25 Mar 2006, 12:28

NOiZE wrote:i could, but didn't because of lazyness

Perhaps once you finnished Red Triangle

SeanHeron · Post by **SeanHeron** » 25 Mar 2006, 14:47

LOl, I can understand. I├é┬┤ve been messing around all morning and I can see that its more bother to do than I thought at first.

Dragon45 · Post by **Dragon45** » 25 Mar 2006, 15:32

OMG pimple hills... it looks TEH UGLY.

Sheekel · Post by **Sheekel** » 25 Mar 2006, 23:02

it looks like teh secks.

Andreask · Post by **Andreask** » 25 Mar 2006, 23:56

It looks ugly and it plays real tedious.

Post by **jcnossen** » 26 Mar 2006, 13:39

That's some serious constructive criticism here

Ok it has been established that some people don't like OTA heightmaps, so get over it now and post something that is useful.

mufdvr222 · Post by **mufdvr222** » 26 Mar 2006, 14:33

I agree.
The map is meant to emulate an ota map in Spring and pulls it off well.

Spring RTS Engine

..:: Release ::.. Red River and Red River North

..:: Release ::.. Red River and Red River North