AATA Scale Discussion

AATA Scale Discussion

Discuss game development here, from a distinct game project to an accessible third-party mutator, down to the interaction and design of individual units if you like.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

*bump* :shock:


What is the opinion of the testers on the new scale? Should it be kept or should we go back to the old one? I'd like to gauge your opinions before outlining the pros and cons from a modding perspective.

Also need to make sure you all have the latest version (with the improved plane behaviour) so we can get a solid buglist built up.
User avatar
Nemo
Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1376
Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 19:44

Post by Nemo »

I really like the scale, personally. If spring could handle smaller, I'd campaign for even smaller.

But, I can understand if it should be bigger for the sake of visiblity and model/footprint/hit sphere issues.
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

Pros:
  • Maps are twice as big
    LoS is twice as big
    Texture resolution is effectively doubled
    Weapon ranges are doubled
Cons:
  • Next map format will have bigger maps anyway
    Breaks compatibility with standard maps in regards to water depth and such
    Reduces effectiveness of some weapons (although they all need a good overhaul anyway)
    Footprints are just plain nasty now with very little differentiation between f.ex. a light tank and a heavy tank
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Post by Felix the Cat »

I think the pros override the cons in this case, especially in regard to line of sight.
Warlord Zsinj
Imperial Winter Developer
Posts: 3742
Joined: 24 Aug 2004, 08:59

Post by Warlord Zsinj »

Please make absolutely certain that collision models are not thrown critically out of whack by the reduced scale.

In SWS, we scaled all the infantry down so that they were much smaller; but the result was that the battle droids, who were already quite small, became practically impossible for small scale laser weaponry to hit. This completely changed the balance of SWS, where the droids became all-powerful, as can be seen in the current release.

In order to solve this issue, we played around with weapons, with health, etc; but the result was never desirable. Eventually, we simpl scaled the droids up by ~150%, which solved the problem entirely.

Spring doesn't seem to handle small units very well. Which is a big shame, because as MiniSpring showed us, it really made things look much better, with high mountains really being high mountains, and men fitting more logically under trees.
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

a good point, shall have to do some testing
User avatar
Argh
Posts: 10920
Joined: 21 Feb 2005, 03:38

Post by Argh »

I have done tests, and if you use S3O, instead of 3DO... you can get control over the collision spheres, and this quits being a problem. Just a note...
User avatar
Nemo
Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1376
Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 19:44

Post by Nemo »

Is there any quick and dirty way to mass-convert .3dos to .s3os? I know the model conversion is easy enough, but retexturing every single model would be a bit of a pain.
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

A major pain, especially without a texture artist and noone with UV mapping capabilities. The mod team is pretty much just me at the minute. :(
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

Flozi, if it will help, I can give you an early version of my urban map so you can have something that will match the feature scale that most of the modelers will be using.
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

Your scale is nowhere near matchable for AATA.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Post by smoth »

well, just trying to help. if I might ask, why isn't it?
User avatar
Nemo
Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1376
Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 19:44

Post by Nemo »

Since Spring doesn't allow for units with footprints smaller than 1x1, units can only be so small. Even now, a few of the AATA units are on the small side for their footprint side. The issue is that even with half scale, AATA infantry are about 12 feet tall, with your current scale.

Smoth, if you have a map with urban features, I can run through with the various 'realistic' scale mods and let you know how they do.

My prediction right now is:
1) SWTA: Stormtroopers and such are about 18 feet tall, maybe closer to 20.
2) WD: Infantry about 15 feet tall
3) AATA: Infantry roughly 10-12 feet tall.

SWTA uses larger models, so they're easier to see and whatnot. However, this will cause issues with scale on any kind of urban map. I think a SWTA stormtrooper is roughly the same height as a peewee. Actually, I'll post a shot of AATA infantry, WD infantry, and a SWTA trooper together next to a peewee when I get home tonight.
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

Nemo hit it pretty much on the head:

Image

XTA ArmCom, old AATA inf, new scale AATA inf.

Already they are considerably undersized for their minimum 1x1 footprint (the originals were appropriately sized) and hit detection is suffering considerably (it was bad enough with the old scale).

It is just not practical. At all. :|
Warlord Zsinj
Imperial Winter Developer
Posts: 3742
Joined: 24 Aug 2004, 08:59

Post by Warlord Zsinj »

Perhaps you must consider the dreaded multi-unit squads? I think that with a bit of work and thought, that could be implemented reasonably well.

Otherwise you'll just have to deal with enormous infantry.

Another solution is to make some custom maps with scaled up trees, etc.
User avatar
FLOZi
MC: Legacy & Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 6241
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 01:14

Post by FLOZi »

The current scale are hardly enourmous. :| Compared to SWTA they are minute...


And I am not having multi-unit squads. Ever. :wink:
User avatar
Nemo
Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1376
Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 19:44

Post by Nemo »

Well, I really can't see the problem with just making modeling urban features around the scale of the mod, since the mod is about at its limit.


Or, poke the devs into allowing a footprint smaller than 1x1, or some form of minispring/slider.

I'll post a peewee vs WD trooper vs SWTA trooper vs AATA trooper sometime tonight.
User avatar
Nemo
Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1376
Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 19:44

Post by Nemo »

Double post of win!

Image

Edit: Now that I think about it, there's no reason to use the smaller scale. All the .fbi and .tdf values can be changed, and maps will be bigger soon anyways. Maelstrom's excel .fbi editor makes this pretty easy. If you have a version with non-shrunk .3dos, I'll double LoS and weapon ranges so we get the same effect.
Warlord Zsinj
Imperial Winter Developer
Posts: 3742
Joined: 24 Aug 2004, 08:59

Post by Warlord Zsinj »

wow, those infantry are really tiny. You must have real trouble with those collision spheres...

Still, if you could pull it off at that scale, it would look really good, and make it easier for scaling units later. One issue we have in SWTA is that we want everything to be to scale, but we can't scale infantry down very much without causing issues; and if we scale everything up to match the infantry, we're going to have some huge vehicles around the place.

(and damn, isn't that stormy sexy ;) )
User avatar
Nemo
Spring 1944 Developer
Posts: 1376
Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 19:44

Post by Nemo »

actually, there aren't really any issues with infantry hit detection, since all of the weapons in AATA currently use the default 'blob' projectile, which is sigifigantly larger than the laser that was causing the issues in SWTA.

However, this WILL become an issue if AATA arms fire is changed to tracer-style lasers.
Post Reply

Return to “Game Development”