SinbadEV wrote:I couldn't say... I never thought about who was "in charge of advertising"...
Obviously project leader was (or is) this person then. So .. I'm still waiting for introducing to him by any reputable person here. The goal is to share experience and knowledge by both sides.
smoth wrote:
5) it's developers were fairly open about it and welcomed PR.
Google_Frog didn't said that in plain words, but volunteers could be attracted not by PR (Public Relations) mostly, but rather with the PR (Private Relations).
But still if private relations were used, I think, it's important to show publicly somehow that "developers were fairly open".
It's sad when the some interesting peaces of information about project are buried in the project forum.
And it's not easy for regular web site visitor to find such pearls.
When such situation happened project web site would have "main home page" article and "about" articles only.
But well, web site could also have another articles and even whole article categories which could represent project for any visitor in a better manner.
Who could write articles about project? Well, my own method is to compile information blocks from forum posts.
But current project already has own articles. Writers outside project created these texts.
And posting links to them in appropriative place on the website really could represent project very good.
Yes there could be "updates" organized as forum threads.
But forum structure doesn't allow to show "updates" as a blog section. Where each "update" could be shown not only by the name of "update".
But also with some short intro text and with one intro image.
Isn't such information design not better?
Using brand "Star Wars" in project and not utilizing social networks at one time. I don't know. I'm like
