Need anti-air or anti-air-looking units for AA

Need anti-air or anti-air-looking units for AA

Various things about Spring that do not fit in any of the other forums listed below, including forum rules.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Need anti-air or anti-air-looking units for AA

Post by Caydr »

Finally decided to cave in and try to add a balanced L2 anti-air kbot to AA. But I can't find any that don't look like crap. Any suggestions? Even if the unit isn't currently an anti-air unit, I can make it one... I just want it to be visually appealing really, I can do the rest on my own. (I could make them from scratch but that would take a long time and I'd like to have them in 1.42)
Chocapic
Posts: 556
Joined: 16 Oct 2005, 03:35

Post by Chocapic »

what about the conversation over that in the past about making ppl going through diferent plant types to have all they wanted ?
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

Well, this unit would be nothing compared to a real flakker tank, just a longer ranged crasher-type thing with a bit of extra firepower.

I don't really think it's needed, but a lot of people were asking...
User avatar
hrmph
Posts: 1054
Joined: 12 May 2005, 20:08

Post by hrmph »

I imagine a tank with large treads and the head of a Raven from XTA. Atleast I think thats the name of that terrain-only-firing kbot. Or a kbot with the same head but a differing body. Just my 2 cents,
User avatar
Masse
Damned Developer
Posts: 979
Joined: 15 Sep 2004, 18:56

Post by Masse »

but he wants kbot :wink:
User avatar
Corncobman
Posts: 8
Joined: 10 Nov 2004, 14:50

Post by Corncobman »

You could try the Pom-Pom from Terror Maps and Units

Image

http://tmu.tauniverse.com/?p=units
Chocapic
Posts: 556
Joined: 16 Oct 2005, 03:35

Post by Chocapic »

Caydr wrote:Well, this unit would be nothing compared to a real flakker tank, just a longer ranged crasher-type thing with a bit of extra firepower.

I don't really think it's needed, but a lot of people were asking...
its not that im opposed to the flak kbot , i like it but ive seen a lot of the "we dont need that" :P
Just make it not very powerfull (less powerfull then the mobile flak from the adv vehicle plant)
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

I"m not going to bother with the idea in 1.42 after all. Even the very best ones I've found or had people show me are positively hideous.
User avatar
Decimator
Posts: 1118
Joined: 24 Jul 2005, 04:15

Post by Decimator »

Heh, I tried. :P
User avatar
FrostySalamander
Posts: 4
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 07:02

Post by FrostySalamander »

That Pom-Pom looked great for a flak bot.
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

The only problem with it is that it's missing a midsection. It was designed strongly with OTA in mind, meaning that anything you can't see in OTA is not there. It basically has no torso, just a big gaping hole.
Kelson
Posts: 76
Joined: 29 Oct 2005, 08:32

Post by Kelson »

Not everything players beg you for is a good idea to add. Players rarely know what is best for them - hell, most would like to pump out orcones from a l1 lab and duke it out that way.

I go kbot fairly often and rarely, if ever, have a problem dealing with air. An adv con kbot with farks can build more than enough flak (and on the core side, a group of freakers) - and if I really need roving antiair, I'll pick up l1/l2 fighters to deal with them. The mobile flaks are pretty garbage as of now anyhow. That is, after all, why people often kill them with brawlers.
Chocapic
Posts: 556
Joined: 16 Oct 2005, 03:35

Post by Chocapic »

I think its sorta "usefull" so to speak, in some very specific situations when you dont want to spend res doing another plants and want a moving flak on the fly (and it would be cheaper then the flakker).
User avatar
Caydr
Omnidouche
Posts: 7179
Joined: 16 Oct 2004, 19:40

Post by Caydr »

Ah but people so dislike being told they don't know what's best for them :roll:
aspa
Posts: 32
Joined: 29 Sep 2005, 01:51

Post by aspa »

I want an AA kbot that looks like this:

[edit]seems they removed the pic. The original page is http://world.guns.ru/machine/mg08-e.htm
OK put the image on my page:
Image
[/edit]

It would shoot bullets instead of flak... or maybe rapid fire weak flak shells. A cheap or fast-to-build unit that's supposed to be used in groups.
Last edited by aspa on 26 Jan 2006, 15:37, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
FizWizz
Posts: 1998
Joined: 17 Aug 2005, 11:42

Post by FizWizz »

aspa wrote:I want an AA kbot that looks like this:

Image

It would shoot bullets instead of flak... or maybe rapid fire weak flak shells. A cheap or fast-to-build unit that's supposed to be used in groups.
omfg teh pwnz0rz!!!
oh wait, I don't see anything...
User avatar
Decimator
Posts: 1118
Joined: 24 Jul 2005, 04:15

Post by Decimator »

The white box of dewm!
User avatar
forbidin
Posts: 64
Joined: 19 Jan 2006, 17:55

Post by forbidin »

You can prob take some RUMAD units from MADTA. They have a few rocket kbots that could be used to fire AA missles in volleys (like the AA ships)
User avatar
Corncobman
Posts: 8
Joined: 10 Nov 2004, 14:50

Post by Corncobman »

Caydr wrote:The only problem with it is that it's missing a midsection. It was designed strongly with OTA in mind, meaning that anything you can't see in OTA is not there. It basically has no torso, just a big gaping hole.
Just ask the guys at TAU to see if they can remodel it. Quite a few people are still making units. The original unit creators might still be there.
User avatar
aGorm
Posts: 2928
Joined: 12 Jan 2005, 10:25

Post by aGorm »

Whats wrong with aspa image? have you tryed right clicking and going properties and nicking teh url. If it don't show i suggest you do that.

Acctull I quite like the idea of a rapid fire gun style one. would be a nice point of difference. and would look kinda cool, like the sort of crazy 1 man army guys you get in films with two machine guns under each arm...

aGorm
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”