Tech Annihilation and other thoughts - Page 2

Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Various things about Spring that do not fit in any of the other forums listed below, including forum rules.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
KaiserJ
Community Representative
Posts: 3113
Joined: 08 Sep 2008, 22:59

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by KaiserJ »

all of the *A games: based on 99% on TA (with the biggest differences being which units are available, unit stats and costs etc) evolved like this : OTA -> AA -> BA

tech annihilation (if that is indeed what "greenfields island no wind" is, or the one where you can build the OP missile truck with your commander, i could be wrong): a mutator that adds units to BA

ZK: started as CA, but is now far enough from BA that it can no longer be classified in the same group with it IMO... no tech tree to speak of, completely reworked unit roles, communism teamplay.
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by smoth »

ContiX wrote:Actually, a "family tree" would be perfectly fine as long as the "reason for splitting/what each subsequent update has" was included. However, I doubt anyone is willing to do all the research for that. :)
Well it is kinda pointless beyond satisfying curiosity. "reason for splitting/what each subsequent update has" is sometimes just one person wanted to make their own version of a ta mod with X unit added or removed and they keep mucking about in notepad altering stats after that. it isn't a lot of research just a bunch of pms and questions to a few people will answer most of it.
KaiserJ wrote:mutator
you will hear this term contix:

Spring (engine)
BA (project that uses the engine)
Mutator(mod of a project, in this case BA)

some people create new projects rather than mutators. either way is fine, there is no governance on who makes what mutator beyond polite requests by those who run the projects. Generally, if you want to make a mutator most devs will say yes, but do ask first as a polite request.
User avatar
KaiserJ
Community Representative
Posts: 3113
Joined: 08 Sep 2008, 22:59

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by KaiserJ »

keep it clean guys

i realize that this topic is tailor made for flames and arguments. but don't, please.
User avatar
zwzsg
Kernel Panic Co-Developer
Posts: 7052
Joined: 16 Nov 2004, 13:08

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by zwzsg »

KaiserJ wrote:ZK: started as CA, but is now far enough from BA that it can no longer be classified in the same group with it IMO... no tech tree to speak of, completely reworked unit roles, communism teamplay.
For me what makes ZK different from a *A is not the "reworked unit roles", as every single *A claims to have reworked unit roles, but that a great deal of work has been poured in ZK into remaking most models, scripts, interface, etc....

*A mods are mostly made by people who can't do much modding beside tweaking the numbers in unit defs.

Other mods are made by people who, in addition to editing FBI, can also code Lua gadget & widget, do 3D models, draw textures, code unit animation, make FX, etc...
ContiX
Posts: 33
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:29

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by ContiX »

KaiserJ wrote:keep it clean guys
i realize that this topic is tailor made for flames and arguments. but don't, please.
Sorry, I should have worded my op less flammable-y. :)
User avatar
KaiserJ
Community Representative
Posts: 3113
Joined: 08 Sep 2008, 22:59

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by KaiserJ »

z: you're right; i understated the uniqueness of ZK in comparison to *A; cannot at this point be classified in the same set as *A.

contix: no worries man; everyone here has their own game that they favour, just wanting to keep the classification subjective rather than objective hehe
ContiX
Posts: 33
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:29

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by ContiX »

I think that a sticky or a wiki article for each of the different still-played Spring games would be really useful - Heck, I'd write one up myself if people submitted what they want it to say.
klapmongool
Posts: 843
Joined: 13 Aug 2007, 13:19

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by klapmongool »

soz Kaiser.. he started it.. ;)
ContiX wrote:I think that a sticky or a wiki article for each of the different still-played Spring games would be really useful - Heck, I'd write one up myself if people submitted what they want it to say.
The differences aren't really that interesting.
ContiX
Posts: 33
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:29

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by ContiX »

klapmongool wrote:soz Kaiser.. he started it.. ;)
ContiX wrote:I think that a sticky or a wiki article for each of the different still-played Spring games would be really useful - Heck, I'd write one up myself if people submitted what they want it to say.
The differences aren't really that interesting.
I bet that the various creators of said mutators/mods/etc would disagree about their mod. :) Plus, it'd help newcomers figure out what the heck each thing actually is. I still don't really understand differences between the *As. If someone explained that BA includes THIS or THAT comparative to SA or TechA or PA or DA or XA or GA or XXXA or whatever, it might be less confusing.
User avatar
zwzsg
Kernel Panic Co-Developer
Posts: 7052
Joined: 16 Nov 2004, 13:08

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by zwzsg »

ContiX wrote:I think that a sticky or a wiki article for each of the different still-played Spring games would be really useful - Heck, I'd write one up myself if people submitted what they want it to say.
http://springrts.com/wiki/Games#TA-derived
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by smoth »

not hard to tell gundam, s44, kp, ct, evo, cursed, zk from the *a pool...
ContiX
Posts: 33
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:29

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by ContiX »

zwzsg wrote:
ContiX wrote:I think that a sticky or a wiki article for each of the different still-played Spring games would be really useful - Heck, I'd write one up myself if people submitted what they want it to say.
http://springrts.com/wiki/Games#TA-derived
That's fine, except it has a whole four games, which aren't very descriptive...
User avatar
zwzsg
Kernel Panic Co-Developer
Posts: 7052
Joined: 16 Nov 2004, 13:08

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by zwzsg »

ContiX wrote:That's fine, except it has a whole four games
Are we talking Games or *A mods? Because http://springrts.com/wiki/Games has 8 non-*A games. (IW doesn't count).
ContiX wrote:Which aren't very descriptive
Click blue title, get details.
ContiX wrote:I'd write one up myself
On the wiki, click "Login" (warning, use lowercased nickname). Then back on any wiki page, click "Edit".
ContiX
Posts: 33
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:29

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by ContiX »

zwzsg wrote:
ContiX wrote:That's fine, except it has a whole four games
Are we talking Games or *A mods? Because http://springrts.com/wiki/Games has 8 non-*A games. (IW doesn't count).
ContiX wrote:Which aren't very descriptive
Click blue title, get details.
ContiX wrote:I'd write one up myself
On the wiki, click "Login" (warning, use lowercased nickname). Then back on any wiki page, click "Edit".
I meant *A games, considering there are so many.

Also, is it OK for me to edit the wiki? Is it ok to change the description for...say, NOTA, considering that it pretty much describes any *A game? Maybe add a "No-Longer-Updated" section for older versions of things?
User avatar
smoth
Posts: 22309
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 00:46

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by smoth »

you are probably not the best one to say no longer updated. Leave that to the community at large(after all, gundam rts has not been updated with a new release in over a year)
ContiX
Posts: 33
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:29

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by ContiX »

Tech Annihilation
Balanced Annihilation
Balanced Annihilation - Remake
Rebalanced Annihilation
Progressive Annihilation
Red Annihilation
Mega Annihilation
Supreme Annihilation
Final Annihilation
NOTA
XTA
Advanced Balanced Annihilation
Basically OTA
Simple XTA
Absolute Annihilation
TA: Excess II
Very Supreme Annihilation
Impatient Annihilation
Paced Annihilation
Eternal Annihilation
Hardcore Annihilation
Maximum Annihilation
Tired Annihilation
Zexy Annihilation
Sky Annihilation
Complete Annihilation
Universal Annihilation
JoeAnnihilation
Research Annihilation
TA: World Domination
Total Annihilation
Gay Annihilation

This is why I get confused...I found all of these on Springfiles, some with no description at all. I don't know what's still updated or what is the most updated version. I assume the one that's the most recent, but then again, some have their own website.
User avatar
zwzsg
Kernel Panic Co-Developer
Posts: 7052
Joined: 16 Nov 2004, 13:08

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by zwzsg »

Woah, there's even a couple I had never heard of!


But I bet most of them wouldn't even load in current Spring version. The wiki only list those still alive. Or should list, at least.
ContiX
Posts: 33
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:29

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by ContiX »

zwzsg wrote:Or should list, at least.
Part of my point. The reason I suggested a making a thread earlier is so I could get feedback from people on what's in-play right now, and what's so old no one even remembers it.
User avatar
CarRepairer
Cursed Zero-K Developer
Posts: 3359
Joined: 07 Nov 2007, 21:48

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by CarRepairer »

Look in the project subforum.
ContiX
Posts: 33
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:29

Re: Tech Annihilation and other thoughts

Post by ContiX »

See, though, Tech Annihilation, for instance, doesn't have it's own subforum. But it's listed on the Wiki page. And it's still under active development...
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”