Thought [on web page]
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Thought [on web page]
My own personal opinion aside but I was under the impression from the rapturous praise in the BA site thread that people liked the new BA website? Especially when the media abilities of the site were touted in numerous posts as an improvement?
Re: Thought [on web page]
One response:AF wrote:My own personal opinion aside but I was under the impression from the rapturous praise in the BA site thread that people liked the new BA website? Especially when the media abilities of the site were touted in numerous posts as an improvement?
Yes, the landing page is a bit minimalistic at the moment. Should contain info about what this project is
Re: Thought [on web page]
I was thrilled someone made the effort instead of talking about it. Very happy to see players helping that project.
Re: Thought [on web page]
Of relevance to current site design here in the community:


Re: Thought [on web page]
well, how does your design change that?
eg you have "Games" and "Download" links, like the current design.
People click "Download" -> they get to the engine-only download -> "zomg i cant play this"
So that download page would need a notice "If you just want to get ready to play, you want this: Games Downloads"
So nothing is changed...
The spring website is complicated because its products are complicated.
You need all those various guides, how-to's and multiple downloads because there is no one-click-fun product. (that is really simple)
eg you have "Games" and "Download" links, like the current design.
People click "Download" -> they get to the engine-only download -> "zomg i cant play this"
So that download page would need a notice "If you just want to get ready to play, you want this: Games Downloads"
So nothing is changed...
The spring website is complicated because its products are complicated.
You need all those various guides, how-to's and multiple downloads because there is no one-click-fun product. (that is really simple)
Re: Thought [on web page]
You're looking through the eyes of familiarity.
What we currently have:
What my idea has:
What we currently have:
- A banner with a logo
- A second banner with a different logo, and a tagline
- Learn More
- Download and play
- See the games
- A video with a menu of tabs
- Engine news
- Comunity News
What my idea has:
- A small block with text/links whatever is chosen to go in by whoever has access
- A pretty backdrop with an empty region for the above mentioned block
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: Thought [on web page]
AF, I would argue that a small "About" paragraph should be added somewhere, so that casual people passing by will have a quick answer to the question "Wtf am I?"
Re: Thought [on web page]
Go minimalism.
I agree with AF.
Spring website is 2000s web design, this is how new websites look.
Edit: Where are our twitter buttons? RSS feeds?

Spring website is 2000s web design, this is how new websites look.
Edit: Where are our twitter buttons? RSS feeds?
Re: Thought [on web page]
Spring happens to be about games, and we look quite similar to most popular game official sites (lol, starcraft, wow, etc.). Probably the only ones that are different have way too much flash.Cheesecan wrote:Go minimalism.I agree with AF.
Spring website is 2000s web design, this is how new websites look.
Edit: Where are our twitter buttons? RSS feeds?
KISS is fine, just keep the news on top (even if only summaries).
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 28 Nov 2011, 03:53
Re: Thought [on web page]
Current spring home page set the bar so low that it's hard to go wrong.
Re: Thought [on web page]
Sure, if you want to look the same as the rest.. but why not try to stand out?gajop wrote:Spring happens to be about games, and we look quite similar to most popular game official sites (lol, starcraft, wow, etc.). Probably the only ones that are different have way too much flash.Cheesecan wrote:Go minimalism.I agree with AF.
Spring website is 2000s web design, this is how new websites look.
Edit: Where are our twitter buttons? RSS feeds?
KISS is fine, just keep the news on top (even if only summaries).
Re: Thought [on web page]

^is why
I think that some link consolidation as AF suggested makes sense.
What about good ole java menus?
so like
about
- wtf is spring
- games
- media
- help
Game development
- wiki on game development
- download of engine
engine development
- wiki on engine development
- bug reporting
something like that?
Re: Thought [on web page]
Starcraft and World of warcraft aren't built to attract passers by, most people already know who starcraft or warcraft is when they go there, those sites serve a different purpose. What's more they aren't game engines, they're games.
I propose that individual games should not be given super big features beyond artwork on the main site, instead specific parts of them should be cherry picked as demonstrations of what the engine is capable of.
At most give games individual subsections so they can make a pretty page with a summary and maybe a video and gallery, and a link offsite, but no more. Themed BBpress for that particular project if needs be but I don't see that being a big thing.
There's a belief here that we need to use the kudos and brand power of the engine to lift up our games and make them successful. That's like asking the homeless to pay for mortgages because the middle classes have been hit by the recession. If anything it should be the other way around.
I propose that individual games should not be given super big features beyond artwork on the main site, instead specific parts of them should be cherry picked as demonstrations of what the engine is capable of.
At most give games individual subsections so they can make a pretty page with a summary and maybe a video and gallery, and a link offsite, but no more. Themed BBpress for that particular project if needs be but I don't see that being a big thing.
There's a belief here that we need to use the kudos and brand power of the engine to lift up our games and make them successful. That's like asking the homeless to pay for mortgages because the middle classes have been hit by the recession. If anything it should be the other way around.
Re: Thought [on web page]
I agree, the only thing that may stand in the way of this is:smoth wrote: ^is why
I think that some link consolidation as AF suggested makes sense.
What about good ole java menus?
so like
about
- wtf is spring
- games
- media
- help
Game development
- wiki on game development
- download of engine
engine development
- wiki on engine development
- bug reporting
something like that?
- "I like seeing the whole wiki index but I refuse upon death to bookmark this and demand there's a direct link in the menu"
- "OMG no not an SDK oh god no, but that means we'll have to make a DSD installer?!? *screams at the slightest hint of an SDK*"
Re: Thought [on web page]
well boo hoo for them? I can use the bread crumbs like any other person wikipedia diving.
honestly for the games page, I would just link to the wiki games page.
honestly for the games page, I would just link to the wiki games page.
Re: Thought [on web page]
Not sure we can get away withCheesecan wrote:Sure, if you want to look the same as the rest.. but why not try to stand out?gajop wrote:Spring happens to be about games, and we look quite similar to most popular game official sites (lol, starcraft, wow, etc.). Probably the only ones that are different have way too much flash.Cheesecan wrote:Go minimalism.I agree with AF.
Spring website is 2000s web design, this is how new websites look.
Edit: Where are our twitter buttons? RSS feeds?
KISS is fine, just keep the news on top (even if only summaries).
"First class documentation
Our documentation is one of our most prized possessions and it is frequently updated."

But thanks - another example with actual content beyond pretty pictures.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: Thought [on web page]
AF, if the wiki could be converted over to wordpress, we could use it to do entire dynamically generated sitemaps, rss feeds of those pages... a WHOLE lot of very neat stuff.
Ooooh boy, I get a little moist thinking about all that we could do with a wordpress spring site. The rss feeds alone would be worth their weight in gold.
Ooooh boy, I get a little moist thinking about all that we could do with a wordpress spring site. The rss feeds alone would be worth their weight in gold.
- Forboding Angel
- Evolution RTS Developer
- Posts: 14673
- Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43
Re: Thought [on web page]
TinyMCE would be a massive blessing.
Re: Thought [on web page]
Well this is the thread to suggest it.