Das Bruce wrote:Not really, BC2 was breifly enjoyable but not something that would inspire me to pay US$60 for its sequel.
Since when is BF3 the sequel to BC2? The entire Bad Company franchise was created to have a consolified version of the Battlefield games with especially a good singleplayer campaign. In the process many things got dumbed down (no more jets, rarely helicopters, no getting prone and thus an easy weapon handling even with MGs, "stupid" classes i.e. grenade launcher + ammo kit = infinte ammo = bad idea)...
Well ok, BF3 isn't going to be a pure sequel to BF2 as some BC2 features were adapted too but it's going to be way different from the Bad Company games...
For me BF2 was the perfect mix between realism and game. Things like ARMA can get tedious as hell (especially due to the long travelling times) while BF2 managed to even out both aspects pretty well giving you neither a completely realistic game with all its annoyances nor a bland shooter where you just rush ahead and auto-fire in the enemy's general direction. It especially featured nice teamplay aspects just as huge maps with vehicles...
As BF3 seems to sort of stay true to the BF2 spirit (especially as they added in some "missing" things after the veteran alpha test phase) I'm definitely going to buy and use it as reason to change from Windows XP to 7...
