I laughed for a full minute.knorke wrote:These tests are nice. I like taking them when they show up on a computer with no adblocker, this one is best:
(Who are your relatives? Test now.)
That ad is the best ad.
Moderator: Moderators
I laughed for a full minute.knorke wrote:These tests are nice. I like taking them when they show up on a computer with no adblocker, this one is best:
(Who are your relatives? Test now.)
Are you sure you don't need some psychiatric help? I am quite paranoid myself, but this is surpassed mine by several levels.hoijui wrote:porn-site owners mix in some small percentage of child porn. now when you click on the wrong links too often, or with newer browsers and protocol versions, or even keep your mouse-pointer over the wrong thing for too long, you would be registered in some sort of suspicion-DB.
Conclusion from this:hoijui wrote:BBC documentary The Trap. very much relevant to topic:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_zk2X92kxY
... especially when you get to part 5 of 6.
beware, these 6 parts form only the first of tree bigger parts. the other 2 are on youtube too.
While your reasoning makes sense, there are a few weaknesses I'd like to point out, which I consider in my own decision making. We are not omniscient, so our evaluation of benefit and risk is always incomplete. In any task, you can find potential risk, whether incidental or derivative.hoijui wrote:so i can choose to do X or not to do X. i have absolutely no benefit in doing X, but there are potential risks when doing X.
-> i won't do X.
you declare i don't do X because of fear, totally out of the blue.
you do not give a single argument or hint why i should do X.
it is like i tell you, that you are obviously controlled by your fear, because you are not walking round the block 24/7.