catapult

[Silentwings]

so, if i wanted to hear an argument about whether catapults are failures when compared to the much cheaper vanguard... i come here, right?

[Jazcash]

If you've come here to whine about Catapults, you're in the wrong place mate.

[Silentwings]

I *love* catapults. And I *hate* vanguards. That is really the cause of the problem.

[Sucky_Lord]

Well, of all the places you could come to make this debate, the spring forums has gotta be pretty high up on the list

[Jazcash]

*waves arm at avatar like a diseased panda*

[Wombat]

I *love* catapults. And I *hate* vanguards. That is really the cause of the problem.

typical core player.





tbh i like catapults more than vanguards. somehow funny, not bored of them, nice area attack which makes them massacre everything in their way.

[Silentwings]

i win the bet =p ty ty ty

[Nixa]

What wombat is saying is he likes catapults because they're not op, but if he was trying to win and only had that choice, he'd build vanguards.

[ginekolog]

All catapult needs is double life (12k life ) OR much cheaper cost, lets say 3k.

ATM is totaly useless unit.

[Johannes]

Meh, it's not a useless unit, even if isn't as good overall as vanguard. But few units are.

[Hackfresser]

i find it's ability to shoot through plasma shields and outrange ddm to be pretty good.
but, im not much of a t3 player since my machine cant handle it.
i guess berthas and vanguards counter it pretty well.

[Sucky_Lord]

I think if it could move 1.4* faster we'd have it made.

[Yuri]

Catapults need a HP buff, they are as fragile as f*.