not decreased, but removed.BaNa wrote:I recall the levelers and gollies selfdamage got decreased at one point. (may be wrong about the golly) I would be for putting it back to full selfdam, as then the ultimate counter of just taking your cheap shit units in close would work better.
Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
Moderator: Content Developer
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
awwwwwwwwwwwwwwJohannes wrote: not decreased, but removed.

why? it used to make them so well counterable if opponent was stupid and you microd.
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
Yeah its a shit change....
Imo levies should totaly get a bit more speed but get self dmg back...would be a good idea for goliaths as well actually.
Imo levies should totaly get a bit more speed but get self dmg back...would be a good idea for goliaths as well actually.
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
That's fine then... I did it the other waytriton wrote:Missclic, I voted yes but I wanted to vote no ^^

Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
Conclusion of the vote is that about 2 third of players play arm, one third only play core.
Apply your modification and start a new arm vs core vote : you will get more than 2 third for am this time.
Apply your modification and start a new arm vs core vote : you will get more than 2 third for am this time.
- Sucky_Lord
- Posts: 531
- Joined: 22 Aug 2008, 16:29
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
Its not about arm v core, its about balancing it without putting in loads of petty, shitty little nuisances that most people dont know about.
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
Wow what a ****** little core *****.albator wrote:Conclusion of the vote is that about 2 third of players play arm, one third only play core.
Apply your modification and start a new arm vs core vote : you will get more than 2 third for am this time.
Same tune every day and every BA thread.Maybe give it a rest?
Arm llt shooting over solars is not gonna make ARM suddenly op.
Im not sure about this vote though...
I mean if voting is gonna rule over ba balance than cool but if shit is not gonna get implemented based on the vote results than why start a vote...
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
1) core gets buffs every release
2) im pretty sure majority of ppl play core
3) Llamadeus - if u suck, dont blame it on core. u clearly can be top spring player while playing core.
kkthxstfu
2) im pretty sure majority of ppl play core
3) Llamadeus - if u suck, dont blame it on core. u clearly can be top spring player while playing core.
kkthxstfu
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
What?Wombat wrote: 3) Llamadeus
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
Where did llamadeus comment?
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?

gave his name as top spring 1v1 player who is playing core..............
/ok 'used to' bu still, before all these ridiculous core buffs
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
What?Wombat wrote:
gave his name as top spring 1v1 player who is playing core..............
/ok 'used to' bu still, before all these ridiculous core buffs
- Sucky_Lord
- Posts: 531
- Joined: 22 Aug 2008, 16:29
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
clearly kixu is top core player, llamadeus can fuck his llamas elsewhere
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
Arm vs Core has been pretty balanced for a long time. I alternate just about every game and it rarely makes a big difference.
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
llamadeus was better than kixu on 1v1.Sucky_Lord wrote:clearly kixu is top core player, llamadeus can fuck his llamas elsewhere
Show me replay where you beat him to prove me I am wrong.
For team game kixu is better.
~ Agree, but that is for reason...Wombat wrote:1) core gets buffs every release
Now, let talk about llt since I have post about that here yet :D
Just to take the particular case of 1v1 on veh map - let us say CCR to fix your mind :D - and I dont think any of the top 1v1 player will deny that: if you dont take the advantage using instigator, you will loose after 10 minutes cause stumpy are far better than raider.
I dont have so much problem with that since core can actually win using instigator.
But if llt fire above arm solar, the tactic consisting in porcing/expanding witout raiding become much more easier for arm.
Arm already has beamer as a really good defence btw, I dont understand why arm should become the porcier faction spamming the most metal-cost-effcient T1 unit: stumpy. It looks like a little bit core to me....
I don't see any reasons to change something that have proved to be balanced since several year just cause a majority of people - that think llama suck - will vote for it.
"democracy is the tyranny of incompetence"
This pool remind me the idea of nixa to make the balance of his mod basing on vox populi.
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
+1BaNa wrote:
eh, i always felt it was counter-intuitive to have the same sized solars for core and arm block llts differently.
I vote for change, this is only a nubtrap that makes no sense beyond arbitrary "it has always been so" logic.
Physics should be obeyed properly where possible.
I got confused many times when I started spring. And starting with spring is hard enough looking to the many diffrent units and the masses/strategy in which you can make/use them.
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
Well that's where the current difference comes from, arm solar is physically larger...Floris wrote:+1BaNa wrote:
eh, i always felt it was counter-intuitive to have the same sized solars for core and arm block llts differently.
I vote for change, this is only a nubtrap that makes no sense beyond arbitrary "it has always been so" logic.
Physics should be obeyed properly where possible.
Re: Should Arm Solar block LLT fire?
as always u got no idea what are u talking about.Sucky_Lord wrote:clearly kixu is top core player, llamadeus can fuck his llamas elsewhere
@ waldo - lol, i had no idea it looks so ridiculous. i wish i could vote 1 again