Nice guys do not get girls... [contains immature language]

[dizekat]

I accidentally fell upon: http://www.heartless-bitches.com/rants/ ... s/ng.shtml

haha good one.

[Gota]

What im saying is that there is no loyalty for the sake of loyalty.

People are not penguins, we do not get some kind of need "to be with one another." We choose to.

We in many cases can suffer someone just cause we, at that specifi moment, have nobody to repalce him with and do not want to break the habit of being with that person or do not want ot be alone etc..

The fact that you look at someone as suffering them tells me you cannot love. Period. You cannot consider the other person beyond your OWN needs, you are entirely self serving. It is not unusual, there are people who simply REQUIRE direction or nudging, you are one of them. Your perspective on games is similar, unless the game has a required parameter you feel there is a lack of direction. Not saying I entirely understand you but that personality trait, the need for a clearly defined direction is one I have seen before. Just a personality I guess.

Why listen to a song, or watch a sunset? Some people need external reasons others do not. There are people in this world who will climb a mountain because they want to see the other side and people who will climb it because what they want is on the other side. You are the later I am the former we will not see eye to eye.

So I want to end this sub-discussion on this note: Just because you think something doesn't make it an absolute. That is kinda the point of this thread showing other perspectives on a viewpoint. I think it is nice that you have such a clearly defined perspective and there may be others including women who can get into an entirely pragmatic relationship. That is PERFECTLY OK but do not say that it is the only way to view the world.

I dont look at being with somebody as suffering i said in some cases its like that.
In some cases your in a relationship which you should already have ended but still havent.
lolz so based on My dislike of minecraft and a misinterpretation and over assumption of my short paragaph you decided you figured me out?
I mena hell maybe your osme genious and stuff but dont you think that trying to make assumptions about my personality based on my dislike of minecraft is a bit...silly(nicely put)...

[SinbadEV]

If he has technical understanding he could built a pc for 1/3 of the money his mac costs.
The mac products are mere design products how can somebody who knows about computers buy that?

so I think the term we're looking for is "Yuppie".

Its not insulting enough even though its from the 80's. (gayest decade ever)

First: I have no idea why my brother in law buys macs other then they are pretty and fit the decor of his house... though admittedly OSX has some pretty keen features. He has gone so far as to install a virtual machine which allows him to play steam games and WoW and he has 2 Macs and 3 Linux machines.


Second... what about "Foppish"?

[Gota]

Mac is the best,nerds.

[TradeMark]

Wait a second... now its about computer geeks... this thread is funny

[dizekat]

What im saying is that there is no loyalty for the sake of loyalty.

People are not penguins, we do not get some kind of need "to be with one another." We choose to.

We in many cases can suffer someone just cause we, at that specifi moment, have nobody to repalce him with and do not want to break the habit of being with that person or do not want ot be alone etc..

The fact that you look at someone as suffering them tells me you cannot love. Period. You cannot consider the other person beyond your OWN needs, you are entirely self serving. It is not unusual, there are people who simply REQUIRE direction or nudging, you are one of them.

Also some people kind of want to go out in middle of night away from the city to just look at stars, but it would be too crazy for comfort, the norm being what is the norm for all their friends whose idea of a night well spent is going to a bar.

Your perspective on games is similar, unless the game has a required parameter you feel there is a lack of direction. Not saying I entirely understand you but that personality trait, the need for a clearly defined direction is one I have seen before. Just a personality I guess.

ha, regarding games... ya I was quite surprised how many people needed/wanted direction in my game, it had to "have a point", just flying around and having 50 different scoreboards that require at least 10 different tactics to top, that was not enough. Still a lot of people (i don't know which percentage) really don't need that direction so I am very glad I released it without wasting another year or so making level scripts for the people who need that.

speaking of sunsets... I quite agree. I go with my GF to see milky way simply because it is awesome, even first time we did go see stars it was way way past the "have to impress her" stage of peacock, err, human courtship.
Also, going to see stars sounds all nice and romantic, but reality is

1. its far away from city or any street lights or buildings
2. its very, very dark,
3. you're walking there using just a weak red flashlight to avoid exposing the eyes.
4. its quite cold and windy,
5. we did go through a forest (dark like in a cave),
6. passed by several unfinished buildings (abandoned 'cause of recession),
7. it is on the beach and sea is loud and nobody could hear you scream; hell even if sea was silent nobody could hear you scream anyway 'cause of first bullet point, but the loudness does make it quite obvious.

Pretty much all girls and guys would've loved fiction romantic night of seeing the stars, for various reasons that has nothing to do with stars, but the real version of it, I somehow doubt many people would of enjoyed it at all. We both enjoyed that very much though.

[Gota]

Dize!!!
I actually wanted your thingy to go the other way!!no gameplay just floating around to the music and having "portals" that u can go into and than youd enter like a "Sliders" tunnel that also moves to the rhythm and emerged in a place that uses a different visualization instead of you having to change them manually.

basically I wanted a full Aesthetic eye candy joy ride without interruptions and as much eye candy as possible in different combinations and sizes etc.

[Machete234]

Wait a second... now its about computer geeks... this thread is funny

It was a matter of time.

First: I have no idea why my brother in law buys macs other then they are pretty and fit the decor of his house..

OMG you didnt say that? yes you did! oh crap!

[dizekat]

Dize!!!
I actually wanted your thingy to go the other way!!no gameplay just floating around to the music and having "portals" that u can go into and than youd enter like a "Sliders" tunnel that also moves to the rhythm and emerged in a place that uses a different visualization instead of you having to change them manually.

basically I wanted a full Aesthetic eye candy joy ride without interruptions and as much eye candy as possible in different combinations and sizes etc.

hehe well i were agreeing with smoth in general then. A few people expressed sentiments how my game doesn't have any point (the primary critique tbh, its kind of amusing that user review score are 8.5 to 9.5 /10 while critic review scores are around 7/10 , well coz critics really want direction so that they just get done with game asap and can be done with the review).
By the way, you can set difficulty to none for that, then click 'restart game'. No enemies will spawn. And enemies are the only un-eye-candy object there.

[smoth]

screw the haters dize!

[Gota]

Dize!!!
I actually wanted your thingy to go the other way!!no gameplay just floating around to the music and having "portals" that u can go into and than youd enter like a "Sliders" tunnel that also moves to the rhythm and emerged in a place that uses a different visualization instead of you having to change them manually.

basically I wanted a full Aesthetic eye candy joy ride without interruptions and as much eye candy as possible in different combinations and sizes etc.

hehe well i were agreeing with smoth in general then. A few people expressed sentiments how my game doesn't have any point (the primary critique tbh, its kind of amusing that user review score are 8.5 to 9.5 /10 while critic review scores are around 7/10 , well coz critics really want direction so that they just get done with game asap and can be done with the review).
By the way, you can set difficulty to none for that, then click 'restart game'. No enemies will spawn. And enemies are the only un-eye-candy object there.

Yeah i know.I did that.but wormholes to different visualizations would be awesome :)

[dizekat]

Dize!!!
I actually wanted your thingy to go the other way!!no gameplay just floating around to the music and having "portals" that u can go into and than youd enter like a "Sliders" tunnel that also moves to the rhythm and emerged in a place that uses a different visualization instead of you having to change them manually.

basically I wanted a full Aesthetic eye candy joy ride without interruptions and as much eye candy as possible in different combinations and sizes etc.

hehe well i were agreeing with smoth in general then. A few people expressed sentiments how my game doesn't have any point (the primary critique tbh, its kind of amusing that user review score are 8.5 to 9.5 /10 while critic review scores are around 7/10 , well coz critics really want direction so that they just get done with game asap and can be done with the review).
By the way, you can set difficulty to none for that, then click 'restart game'. No enemies will spawn. And enemies are the only un-eye-candy object there.

Yeah i know.I did that.but wormholes to different visualizations would be awesome :)

i think it still spawns wormholes at difficulty none. Just not with "hide game" in editor.

[Hoi]

The evolution of the spambot.

[Sabutai]

Kill it. Kill it now or it will return for more links.

[PicassoCT]

one day she will be alone on the web, a web full of virtual girlz.

[SinbadEV]

What I find astonishing is that the bot actually bothered to set a profile pic... I don't think I've seen that one before. (Also, to avoid confusion, I removed the spam post that these last 4 comments were related to)

edit: Still not as impressive as the bot that seemed to have an algorithm to defend itself. I was legitimately suspicious that it was just a smurf messing with me... if your ad-bot can pass the Turing test (even if he's just a well written Chinese room) then, despite you using your powers for evil, I have a lot of respect for you.

[bobthedinosaur]

Legit question here, what is 'evil'?

[SinbadEV]

Legit question here, what is 'evil'?

The phrase "using your powers for evil" is a reference to a common comic book trope... that with great power comes great responsibility and using these powers for personal gain rather then the common good is wrong.
For the purposes of this argument: Marketing is Evil, so using your "1337 Programming powers" in support of a marketing campaign... is evil.

[Panda]

I think that was from Spider Man.