Kloot wrote:81.2 also used heatmapping, but the heatmap code worked differently than it does now (there were a number of implementation changes, which simply promoted it from under- to over-effective).
JohannesH wrote:Why would the heatmapping be included in official release when it's so obviously not making anything better
You know those RC's that were posted and not tested by anyone? They're there to catch things like this.
Wouldn't it make the most sense, that the person making the changes to the code would be trying it out too and tweaking to values that work? Instead of just throwing it to the public without testing, who aren't smart enough to comment much on it besides repeatedly telling that it sucks.
I understand that devs work on limited time, but this happening again and again wastes everyones time
