PicassoCT wrote:well there is the basic pact between all mammals, dont eat the young ones, have a egg instead, there is plenty of dino-food around you, help yourself and dont eat something that has large eyes and is a social creature.
Some mammals might kill the cubs, but other mammals are very protective of them and won't. Usually when comparisons are made between humans and other mammals they're made between chimps and mice because these creatures are the most closely related to humans genetically and they're physiological functions including seasonal rhythms resemble those of humans. However, it would be difficult to draw detailed and definitive conclusions when it comes to using their behaviors to explain human behaviors especially on an individual basis. Humans are much more versatile than chimps or mice and, unlike chimps and mice, we are a pandemic and highly nomadic species, making us different.
Gota wrote:Many mammals kill their own kids,lions for example.
Lions don't kill their own kids. They kill the kids of the previous dominant male, so the lioness has only his kids to take care of, and so has more time to raise them well.
well, for starters very few people use the post-military education opportunities available to them to them.....
a buddy of mine was in the marines, he seems rather found of the experiences...but he has no doubt the war was wrong
sure, the military does offer some experiences of people that are looking for it...but that dose not justify its existence, i;am sure with the military gone peep would just find something else.....something that dose not include killing people for the profit and power of others, chances are people will walk out of the military fucked up....
also there was no need for such extreme and destructive form of violence that exist now in the time of the cave man...they have no need to kill each other, nor was their society structured to creat such massive power conflics....taking time/energy 2 kill another man lowers the chances for your survival, anyways humans are social creatures....chances are that they helped each other survive rather than brutishly fighting each other to for no reason other than to justify modern man's twisted perception of the the stereotypical caveman lifestyle in order to give meaning to modern man's empty lifestyle....
anyway, if extreme violence was so common and in nature with caveman.... humans today would not have had such a extream reaction towards it and would not be so emotionally scared by it...becasue they would have eventually evolved and removed such exream physiological reactions towards something that would hurt thier chances of survival(yes, emotional scars from violence dose crippled people's ability for daily function)
also i can argue that conterness does not exist....it is simply the side of our minds that we communicate with.....people make decisions before they are even "conscious" of it
PicassoCT wrote:I served my nine months, (bureacratic job in hq) and army although a great bootcamp-experience when it comes to feeling part of a "combat-family" is a waste of time when it comes to bringing humanity forward just a inch. Think of all the things you could accomplish in that time, while some stupid sergeant makes you think about your haircut and or some even moar ignorant general makes you do his paperwork, while he hangs out at presspartys, to avoid meeting his responsibilitys. And the army is filled with a odd combination of that sort- dutifull guys who try to do there work at best, and always outranked by morons, who got to there post by keeping silent about some shit there superiors did, that sort of omerta promotes, that is the real problem there. Get some pictures of your sarge killin, and he will happily promote you out of sight. Not a nice world, and not promising to be one.
shit picasso, someone had you do their PAPERWORK?
not meant as an insult btw, i wholly enjoy your psychedelic style of writing, I'm just surprised.
As an unknown but clearly sober writer, I often find I enjoy the fluidity of PicassoCT's posts more than anything else I encounter online in a given day. I think paperwork filled out by Picasso would be at least refreshing, if not downright entertaining.
this gun (in theory) should go to velocities > 8 km/sec.
Imagine a gun shooting a solid slow projectile, and then blow it up with a secondary gun that runs its projectiles 8 km/sec. Man, that thing travelling through air, would heat it that much, it should leave a visible light trail behind at night, not to forget the thunderclap, when the hot air collapses back into the vacuum trail off that small, fast devil.
Gota wrote:Many mammals kill their own kids,lions for example.
Lions don't kill their own kids. They kill the kids of the previous dominant male, so the lioness has only his kids to take care of, and so has more time to raise them well.
AFAIK a lioness will not mate with a male as long as she has living children around, a conquering male will kill the children of the previous mate in order to propagate his own genes.
Either way, different species behave very different so pointing at lions makes little sense. How about pointing at pandas? They try to avoid fighting because it's a waste of energy and they can't afford wasting energy with their diet. We are neither lions nor pandas.
