Least used units?
Moderators: Moderators, Content Developer
Re: Least used units?
Hawks/vamps are fine imo. A swarm of them has sick burst damage potential, preventing any late game com heroics with their speed+dps. On large maps they, due to their speed, are very powerful - forces your enemy to have heavy AA cover everywhere he doesn't mind getting instagibbed. Not that useful in crowded small maps most players seem to enjoy, so I understand you might think them up.
- 1v0ry_k1ng
- Posts: 4656
- Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24
Re: Least used units?
I can see why you might think the hawk/vamp are up from the stats, but in practice they are not.
FaerieWithBoots: there used to be a fair few macro XTA players, just most of them arent online anymore
FaerieWithBoots: there used to be a fair few macro XTA players, just most of them arent online anymore
Re: Least used units?
What? I checked and Blizzard released 1 patch with balance changes besides the expansion. That was in 2001, little over 2 years after the release of Brood War. Besides that its just changing mapsFaerieWithBoots wrote:All units are under used!!!! Because XTA doesnt get enough games. All balance changes and new units are hardly testded and played on a limited number of maps.Compare a spring mod with Starcraft, it took Blizzard allmost 10 years to balance out that game. With a player base 1000 times bigger then any spring mod has.
Re: Least used units?
Hi everybody.
According to my calculations: core arti sucks when compared
to arm luger. First of all it costs twice more (but has twice more HP),
it is slower 1.0 (against 1.2 of luger), is less accurate 1300 (vs 1000 of luger) and has smaller Dmg. per second 140 (vs 178).
Is it intended to be so? Lets just change the weapon reload time from 6.66 to 3.33 and see what it give us?
Any other suggestions?
According to my calculations: core arti sucks when compared
to arm luger. First of all it costs twice more (but has twice more HP),
it is slower 1.0 (against 1.2 of luger), is less accurate 1300 (vs 1000 of luger) and has smaller Dmg. per second 140 (vs 178).
Is it intended to be so? Lets just change the weapon reload time from 6.66 to 3.33 and see what it give us?
Any other suggestions?
Last edited by step on 30 Apr 2010, 14:32, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Least used units?
Damage per second.
http://modinfo.adune.nl/index.php?act=e ... =xtapev955
just divide the 933 damage by the ReloadTime (6.66).
Or I am wrong somewhere?
http://modinfo.adune.nl/index.php?act=e ... =xtapev955
just divide the 933 damage by the ReloadTime (6.66).
Or I am wrong somewhere?
Re: Least used units?
Changing core arti DPS to twise higher value by decreasing reloadtime could help.
Re: Least used units?
so it does more damage and fires quicker?
lolk
lolk
Re: Least used units?
I demand that each luger shell be given the same impulse value as that of mobile artillery!
- 1v0ry_k1ng
- Posts: 4656
- Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24
Re: Least used units?
core arty has much more AoE. its less efficent at just about everything, but it compensates by being awesome cool
- FaerieWithBoots
- Posts: 149
- Joined: 17 Jun 2009, 13:21
Re: Least used units?
Core arty may be the least used unit, it also is the most awesome unit in Core's arsenal. i agree with ik there
Dont you just love the sound of a Core Artry shooting, the plasma shot landing in a group of peewees throwing them all over the map :D It is pure epicness. Who cares it costs 2K metal.
(imo, that 2K could be reduced to 1.5K, just so we can see more Core epicness. Also, every unit in arms arsenal kills Core arty)

(imo, that 2K could be reduced to 1.5K, just so we can see more Core epicness. Also, every unit in arms arsenal kills Core arty)
- BrainDamage
- Lobby Developer
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: 25 Sep 2006, 13:56
Re: Least used units?
common sense and intelligence, I see those two used less and less, and why it's a problem when they lack should be pretty evident without explanation
Re: Least used units?
The problem with that statement is you are assuming we haven't lost all common sense.
Re: Least used units?
Some of those stats need to be adjusted by 0.00000001 .
This thread is just proof that Noruas is a King Amoung Mens
This thread is just proof that Noruas is a King Amoung Mens
- Spawn_Retard
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: 21 Dec 2006, 14:36
Re: Least used units?
i think core arty is only viable if your
A. babbles
B. have way to much economy and are wasting it on stupid stuff.
since when im generally in game im not in either position, i think their should be something more viable in that lab, for example a cheap unit that makes up for the unbelievable cost that the other tanks have.
I'm all for the ooo thats cool to pwn your enemy in an embarrassing and awesome way, but i also want another brilliant reason to go core. (firm disliker of arm, apart from luger and panthers.)
A. babbles
B. have way to much economy and are wasting it on stupid stuff.
since when im generally in game im not in either position, i think their should be something more viable in that lab, for example a cheap unit that makes up for the unbelievable cost that the other tanks have.
I'm all for the ooo thats cool to pwn your enemy in an embarrassing and awesome way, but i also want another brilliant reason to go core. (firm disliker of arm, apart from luger and panthers.)
Re: Least used units?
I think anybody who thinks core arti sucks is shit at XTA.
Pintle, opinions are over-rated, don't be a douchefag. Not a warning, just a reminder not to make a useless post.
Pintle, opinions are over-rated, don't be a douchefag. Not a warning, just a reminder not to make a useless post.
Last edited by Noruas on 02 May 2010, 22:00, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Its not constructive.
Reason: Its not constructive.
- 1v0ry_k1ng
- Posts: 4656
- Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 10:24
Re: Least used units?
Werrllll, it does suck in the sense of cost efficency; last time I crunched the stats and did the sterile tests, two lugers are much better at delivering high dps to a single target at range, and two lugers beat one core arti at maximum range in a 2v1. you can have a luger out while core arti is only half made, and two lugers are more than twice as hard to dgun since they are seperate and move faster. core arty also refuses to fire while you are energy stalling, while lugers are more forgiving. given the option of building both in one factory, I would build the luger in a competetive game.pintle wrote:I think anybody who thinks core arti sucks is shit at XTA.
Pintle, opinions are over-rated, don't be a douchefag. Not a warning, just a reminder not to make a useless post.
on the other hand, its probably the most powerful single t2 ground unit besides the penetrator, and has an awesome fear value. It generally kills a good proportion of targets it hits and delivers its full dps x reload time with its first shot, while the luger just sprays everywhere doing constant but light, repairable damage. if your trying to kill a repairgaurded com on 999hp, core arty would be more effective than lugers.
I break it down to:
Do Have ghost/LoS:
Luger is better
Bombarding defences:
Luger is better
in melee:
luger is better
Pre-t2 economy, where 2000 metal is 8 minutes of stalling:
Luger is better
Avoiding destruction from raiders or cloaked commander:
Luger is better
Killing visible commanders:
Core Arty is better
Firing blind:
Core Arty is better
Re: Least used units?
true. core arty can instakill t1 cons, with arm arti they just repair or move away. also i find them harder to spot.It generally kills a good proportion of targets it hits and delivers its full dps x reload time with its first shot, while the luger just sprays everywhere doing constant but light, repairable damage.
imo core arty is better there because you can retreat it, move in anti air or repair whien the arm arti would already be dead.Avoiding destruction from raiders or aircraft
Re: Least used units?
Ok sorry for the lolpost.
Impulse on Core arti owns commanders (and everything else) in a way that nothing Arm has can.
Impulse on Core arti owns commanders (and everything else) in a way that nothing Arm has can.